9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Clark provides the foundation for doing evangelical systematic theolgy, December 15, 2006
This review is from: To Know and Love God: Method for Theology (Foundations of Evangelical Theology) (Paperback)
In this book Dr. Clark gives what I think he means to be a tool for developing an evangelical systematic theology. He describes how theology should interact with culture, literary criticism, science, theology, spirituality, etc. The underlying message in all of this is twofold. First, there is the idea that theology has to do with the real world. It is not something that operates within a separate sphere of knowledge from science or literary criticism. It makes claims both about the way the world is, and it makes claims about the way we are, our spirituality and our rationality. This not because theology transcends the barrier between faith and reason, but because there is no barrier between faith and reason. In other words, Clark repudiates claims by those like Karl Barth who say that we have the real world, and then we have the faith world. In Clark's theology, there is but one world, a fully integrated world.
The second underlying idea, perhaps the more noticeable of the two (as this one is explicitly stated, while the first lies latent in his work) is that goal of theology is not simply to gain knowledge, but to gain wisdom. Dr. Clark says that "evangelical theology us not merely scientia. More fundamentally, it is scientia directed towards the purposes of sapientia." But what exactly is wisdom? Dr. Clark informs us that wisdom is "knowledge directed towards knowing and loving God personally. It is information applied for the purpose of transformation."
So then, we have come to the main point of the book. Theology exists and should be pursued so that we may know and love God, hence the title of the book. Dr. Clark is not especially kind towards those theologians who live in their ivory towers and who approach theology as if it were another science. He wants to see results, not because he is a pragmatist, but because theology without application is useless, just as faith without deeds is useless. If we are not going to apply to our own lives the theological knowledge we gain, then all we have done is in vain, for it does us no good. Simply having knowledge about God and His ways is not going to sanctify us if we are not loving God more as a result of our knowledge.
Again, Dr. Clark's view of a unified realm of knowledge can be seen in his idea of the application of theology. Theology, usually looked upon as belonging to the faith realm, is expected to be applied to what many (most?) people would call the fact realm, the realm in which we actually live. This idea of an unified real of knowledge can be seen by looking at any one of Dr. Clark's chapters on theology and some other area of life.
Take for example his chapter on theology and the sciences. In this chapter he discussed the rationality of doing Christian theology as opposed to the rationality of doing scientific investigations. He notes that people usually suppose that the sciences come to definite, undeniable conclusions as a result of logical reasoning, while the Christian faith is not only a-logical, but often is viewed as illogical because people assume that it goes against reason. In fact, Christians are usually looked upon as being opposed to science, and even going so far as attempting to suppress scientific discovery. This is, unfortunately, often true in today's churches, but it was not true at the time of Galileo, nor is it a position supported either by the Bible or by sound theology.
Dr. Clark goes on to refute the claim that science and theology are at war, as well as the claim that science and theology have nothing to do with each other. He concludes that theology is neither irrational nor a-rational, but rather it is a rational discipline, though not rationalistic. Science, far from simply giving us undeniable theories, is often hijacked by opposing worldviews, who manipulate its theories through a desire for science to conform to their presuppositions. True science, then, gives us knowledge of the same realm of knowledge as theology does. They are not at war, nor separated from each other, but rather they are complimentary. They aid each other in the quest for knowledge, with science seeking knowledge of the physical world, and theology seeking to know the implications of the physical world upon its ideas of God and His ways. Science should be contributing to our theology, not take away from it. Studying the wonders of God's creation only heightens both our knowledge and love of Him.
In conclusion, Dr. Clark's book is incredibly helpful in understanding the foundations of theology (how scripture informs our theology), how theology interacts with other areas of life (both mental and spiritual), and, most importantly, it emphasizes the true goal of theology as being to know and love God. Without this as one's goal in doing theology, it is likely that one's theology will end up dead and lifeless, like the theology of the classical liberalists.
Overall grade: A
P.S. I would like to mention that Dr. Clark seems to be a bit of a Calvinist, and this shows up in a few areas when he discusses the rational foundations for faith. I disagree with him sometimes when he gets into this, but it is an excellent book nonetheless.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A great service for educated laypeople!, May 29, 2004
This review is from: To Know and Love God: Method for Theology (Foundations of Evangelical Theology) (Paperback)
David Clark provides a comprehensive framework for integrating orthodox theology with other sources of knowledge. A roadmap for developing an integrated Christian worldview, with theology at the heart.
Non-theologians will find Clark's respect for other disciplines refreshing. General and special revelation cannot conflict. Thus, Clark's philosophy of theology responds to the questions raised by the natural sciences. Yet the book maintains the quiet confidence that Scripture provides superior knowledge of God, and that Biblical theology will always be the Queen of the Sciences.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Excellent Introduction to Theological Prolegomena, July 17, 2008
This review is from: To Know and Love God: Method for Theology (Foundations of Evangelical Theology) (Paperback)
This book is wonderfully level-headed and clearly written. Clark brings to the subject of theological prolegomena a penetrating mind and an eagerness to see Christian doctrine truly inform and animate the life of God's church. In my mind, one of the strongest features of this book is his epistemological insight displayed especially in sections dealing explicitly with epistemological issues and also sprinkled throughout the entire text. In particular, he offers a compelling critique of perspectivalism (or conceptual relativism) and advocates in its place a more reasonable soft foundationalism. The discussion of truth also proves helpful as he concludes with William Alston (and, we might add, Kevin Vanhoozer) that we do well to uphold a minimalist correspondence view of truth, doing justice to the inescapable human presupposition of correspondence while avoiding the burden of having fully to unpack the nature of that correspondence.
These few features by no means exhaust the contributions of Clark's work. Contextualization, theology and the sciences, and the contours of religious language are among the other issues that he skillfully engages. In sum, I appreciate the philosophical savvy he exhibits throughout the work and hope that this book continues to gain new readers. If I could add one suggestion, I would encourage readers to seek out other texts that deal more thoroughly with the role of tradition as a source for forming theological beliefs. Perhaps D. H. Williams' work and Kevin Vanhoozer's The Drama of Doctrine would do the trick!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
