Customer Reviews


6 Reviews
5 star:
 (4)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


5.0 out of 5 stars hard to find film
I own this wonderful little camera simple to use but in this age of digital cameras the film was impossible to find, so was grateful to find film on Amazon. Perhaps when these rolls are used up I will be forced to get a digital camera?
Published 8 months ago by Doris S. Kelley

versus
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Comparison between Fuji & Kodak APS films
I performed extensive tests (about 2 rolls each) of Fuji and Kodak APS films at 100, 200, and 400 ASA, using a Canon ELPH camera (the original aspherical zoom lens model). I shot a variety of outdoor scenes in a variety of lighting conditions (e.g. downtown skyscraper architectural with bright clear blue sunny skies, flowers and trees with both bright sun and shade, rock...
Published on December 8, 2002 by Joseph King #9995


Most Helpful First | Newest First

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Comparison between Fuji & Kodak APS films, December 8, 2002
By 
This review is from: Kodak Advantix 400 Speed 25 Exposure APS Film (Electronics)
I performed extensive tests (about 2 rolls each) of Fuji and Kodak APS films at 100, 200, and 400 ASA, using a Canon ELPH camera (the original aspherical zoom lens model). I shot a variety of outdoor scenes in a variety of lighting conditions (e.g. downtown skyscraper architectural with bright clear blue sunny skies, flowers and trees with both bright sun and shade, rock close-ups in overcast). I shot a few indoor locations, without a flash at ASA 400, with flash for the others. I examined the results for color, range, clarity and grain. Here's what I saw:

For ASA 100, Kodak kicked ... . Clearly better color rendition, and much, much tighter grain and better detail in all the bright lighting situations, especially with panorama print.

For ASA 400, I was pleasantly surprised that Fuji really outperformed the Kodak film. Fuji had vibrant blues and was good all across to the reds. Kodak felt washed out on the blue side, weirdly. Also surprising was that Fuji had tighter grain in bright conditions; they both looked grainy of course in lower light, but the Fuji somehow felt smoother or less chunky in the blown-up panorama prints. It also seemed to have better tonal range in both light and dark settings.

Frankly, neither of the ASA 200 films seemed acceptable to me for outdoor shots; indoors with flash, both were OK and Kodak was maybe better color. Outside, they both felt lower contrast/saturation, subsequently cramped color, didn't have the tight grain of the 100, and didn't work as well in low light and indoors (without flash) as the 400. Just seemed not worth it compared to the two options.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars hard to find film, May 22, 2011
By 
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Kodak Advantix 400 Speed 25 Exposure APS Film (Electronics)
I own this wonderful little camera simple to use but in this age of digital cameras the film was impossible to find, so was grateful to find film on Amazon. Perhaps when these rolls are used up I will be forced to get a digital camera?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars excellent on-time delivery, March 4, 2010
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Kodak Advantix 400 Speed 25 Exposure APS Film (Electronics)
This was for an older camera that my mother has and she couldn't find any film. She was very pleased and I was extremely pleased with the very fast delivery.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Kodak Advantix 400, March 9, 2008
By 
Rafael J "RJ's Review" (New York City, NY United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Kodak Advantix 400 Speed 25 Exposure APS Film (Electronics)
For high-quality pictures with your APS camera.
Kodak designs this film for high-quality performance in a variety of picture-taking situations. You can capture close-up or fast-action shots and panoramic views in bright daylight or low-light conditions
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Misleading advertising, March 23, 2007
By 
This review is from: Kodak Advantix 400 Speed 25 Exposure APS Film (Electronics)
This film was advertised with black & white cartridges, so I believed it to be B&W. Wrong! The cartridges were color, not B&W. The picture of the cartridge canister was conveniently small enough to escape detection. I only purchased this online because Advantix is no longer making B&W cartridges, so I cannot buy them at my local drugstore or camera store. Why would I spend more on postage than the price of the film if I could get color cartridges at my local CVS? I have learned my lesson. Caveat Emptor!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Advandtix Film is great!, June 14, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Kodak Advantix 400 Speed 25 Exposure APS Film (Electronics)
I especially love the index print that you get with each roll. That along with the size options and superb clarity make it a huge amount better than regular 35mm film.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Kodak Advantix 400 Speed 25 Exposure APS Film
Used & New from: $6.99
Add to wishlist See buying options