|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Might want to go for the flash version instead
I know this one is $3.00 less than the flash version, but I think you'll like the quality of the pictures with the flash disposable better. You can use the flash for outdoor pictures as well as for indoor ones, and they tend to come out better. Plus you have the option of using it indoors at the end of the day. Reasonable picture quality *for the price* - if you...
Published on August 11, 2000 by Paul Bobbitt
|
 |
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Generally not worth the savings; go for the flash.
I work at a professional photofinishing lab, and I can attest to the quality of the film inside this camera. The Kodak Max Outdoor camera produces mediocre results in all but the brightest of sunlight. Even for outdoor shots, a flash can really help boost image quality. As an example, using a flash when your subject is against a bright background will...
Published on August 29, 2006 by Josh S. Zerin
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Might want to go for the flash version instead,
By Paul Bobbitt "Pobbit" (Toronto, Ontario Canada) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Kodak Max Outdoor 35mm Single Use Camera (Electronics)
I know this one is $3.00 less than the flash version, but I think you'll like the quality of the pictures with the flash disposable better. You can use the flash for outdoor pictures as well as for indoor ones, and they tend to come out better. Plus you have the option of using it indoors at the end of the day. Reasonable picture quality *for the price* - if you wanna take photos for National Geographic, you'll need to pay a bit more than $6.00 for your camera! :)
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Generally not worth the savings; go for the flash.,
By
This review is from: Kodak Max Outdoor 35mm Single Use Camera (Electronics)
I work at a professional photofinishing lab, and I can attest to the quality of the film inside this camera. The Kodak Max Outdoor camera produces mediocre results in all but the brightest of sunlight.
Even for outdoor shots, a flash can really help boost image quality. As an example, using a flash when your subject is against a bright background will prevent your subject from appearing too dark. Unless you are shooting landscapes or landmarks (with nobody in front of them), you should go for the extra versatility offered by the Kodak FunSaver or PowerFlash cameras. |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Out of stock
| |
| ||
