Most Helpful Customer Reviews
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A good international view of the War, June 28, 2000
This review is from: The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism (Hardcover)
A good introductory text to the Korean War. This book will be especially interesting for American readers (like me,) as he focuses on the experience of the Commonwealth and other non-US/S. Korean forces. He also takes an even-handed look at the American military and government in the late forties/early fifties. The poor decision-making and ideology driven policy is well described. When it comes to the Commonwealth side, he is tends to wear rose colored glasses. To be fair he also praises US elite units as well. I liked the way he blended international relations, battle description and domestic political action (in many countries) into a cohesive narrative. Some familiarity with Cold War history is helpful.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Perfect for Brits, less so for Yanks, September 7, 2005
In this book, Korean War veteran and British scholar Michael Hickey provides an interesting narrative of that conflict. Hickey served in a supply unit, and apparently did not see any combat, but this thoroughly researched narrative has no shortage of action. But be prepared for a decidedly British account of the war. Much of the book describes the exploits of the Commonwealth Division, consisting of units from Britain, Australia, Canada, and elsewhere. Meanwhile, purely American events in the war, such as the critical Inchon landings, are merely glossed over. Hickey should not be blamed for focusing on the UK perspective of the war. Commonwealth forces made a relatively small but nonetheless important contribution to the UN effort in Korea, and their story deserves to be told. But the title of the book is misleading. "The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism" implies a broad and balanced overview of the conflict, which this book clearly is not. One wonders if the subtitle was concocted by the publisher in order to attract a larger audience. As is too often the case in military books, there is a dearth of quality maps. The reader struggles to follow the action as it rapidly moves up and down the Korean peninsula. A lesser complaint would be Hickey's fondness for praising the bravery and efficiency of the British soldier, particularly at the expense of the American fighting man. Undoubtedly, many of the comparisons are accurate, especially when speaking of the neglected post-war U.S. Army of 1950, but Hickey indulges in this personal pleasure far too often. He does compliment the U.S. Marines and certain army units repeatedly, sometimes even lavishing them with the ultimate compliment: saying that they could be considered equals of the British troops. If you've already read quite a bit about the Korean War and are looking for a fresh perspective, then this book is ideal. If you are new to the conflict and want an objective explanation of what happened and why, it might be best to look elsewhere.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
When courage and resolve won the day, July 31, 2000
This review is from: The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism (Hardcover)
Given the tremendous social upheaval that took place as a consequence of the American involvement in Vietnam, the domino theory has fallen into disfavor. While most likely not true in the sixties, at the time of the Korean war it was probably true. Eastern Europe had fallen under the Soviet grip and a civil war was fought in Greece that could have ended in a communist victory. The Marshall plan gave Western Europe new hope , but elsewhere communism appeared to be an attractive alternative to capitalism. The forces of Mao Zedong had just emerged victorious in China and colonialism was on its deathbed. When it appeared that the United States had no security interests in Korea and a quick armed victory by the forces of North Korea seemed certain, the attack came. Faced with the strength of the attack and the weakness of the South Korean forces, the choices were to accept a fait accompli on the Korean peninsula or commit huge amounts of American men and material. Fortunately for the world, the US and other western leaders chose to fight. However, the ultimate stalemate, which was in fact a victory, could easily have gone the other way. As is explained very well in this book, there were two points of crisis, the months right after the initial attack and the months after the massive Chinese entry into the war. A US response limited to diplomatic outrage would have emboldened many other moves by the communist forces around the world and other countries would have no doubt fallen into the communist orbit. However, while they were fighting it, the soldiers in Korea generally had no such grandiose thoughts. Their cause was to stay alive and to fight for their units and their pride. While the author does spend some time on the greater geopolitical considerations, most of the book describes the life and struggle of the ground forces. The chronicle of the incredible endurance and tenacity of the men who fought it out is an excellent account of what determined men can do. The author is a British veteran of the Korean campaign and that is no doubt the reason for the most glaring weakness of the book. While it is true that the British, Australian and other Commonwealth troops fought very well, they are portrayed as being the near saviors of many battles, never wavering in the face of enormous numbers of the enemy. Given that US losses were over 33,000 killed and over 100,000 wounded while the UK suffered slightly over 1,000 killed and nearly 3,000 wounded, it is clear who did the bulk of the fighting and dying. Some commentators have been presumptuous enough to argue that Ronald Reagan won the cold war as a consequence of his building up the US military. Such statements are absurd and neglect the courage and resolve of the architects of the Marshall Plan and the military forces commited to Korea. For subsequent events have clearly indicated that communism is an ideology that is all or none. It will either dominate the world or essentially cease to exist. Had the North won a resounding victory, it may have gone the other way, a thesis made clear in this generally excellent book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|