Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Is Planet Earth Growing?,
By
This review is from: The Land of No Horizon (by Kevin J. Taylor and Matthew J. Taylor)
The authors have put together a rock-solid thesis based on last hundred years or so geological findings yet their conclusions are much more advanced. By scientific evidence it is concluded the Earth is expanding, that 200 million years ago the planet was much smaller, its surface area only one third of that of today. Evidence shows that the planet's continents were together as one landmass but the authors prove that the landmass broke off as the resultant of constant Earth growth. They do not accept the traditional speculations regarding the continental drift and the formations of dry land and oceans but go further to prove the solution of the mystery lies in the planet's growth. There is a plenty of scientific evidence the cosmos as a whole is expanding balloon style consequently forcing stars and whole galaxies to travel further apart from each other. The Proof of Earth expansion is irrefutable and scientifically verified and its reality is inseparable from, since the planet would not expand otherwise, the fact the globe is perfectly hollow. This information, an advanced geological discovery,could very well be taught at both college and high school levels. See: Neil Adams' The Growing Earth on You Tube, and Hollow Planets: A Feasibility Study of Possible Hollow Worlds - 0620219637
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Great book, but I expected more.,
By Priscilla Vogelbacher (Chicago, IL) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Land of No Horizon (by Kevin J. Taylor and Matthew J. Taylor)
I first heard about this book on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory. During the interview (which can be heard in full on youtube as of this writing) the authors stated that they spent twelve years researching this and answered all possible questions so that there is no doubt in the readers minds to whether or not the earth is actually hollow. After reading this book, I had many questions left over in my head. I sent a letter to the authors on July 16, 2009. This review contains all questions and most comments.
First of all, this book is amazing. It explains just about everything (geologically speaking). Ever since I first heard about the hollow earth theory I have been completely enchanted by it. All the books I have bought and read about this subject have led me to believe the earth may actually be hollow. I want to believe it, but I also think it's healthy to keep a skeptical view. Unfortunately, no-one from academia will ever take this topic seriously because scientific proof requires mathematics to back it up. It's a pity that the authors don't have that here. My questions to the authors (contains spoilers): You state the planetary wall thins as the inner void expands, pushing the planets mass and thus causing expansion. Doesn't there have to be some sort of hole or holes connecting the inner void and the outer, or else the inner void would become a vacuum? Where did the inner atmosphere come from? If the center of gravity contains a thin layer of molten separating the inner and outer crust, what of the legends stating people making the journey from the outer surface to the inner surface? Wouldn't there be only pockets of molten mass instead of an even layer encompassing the entire earth? How do you explain scientists' link between carbon emissions and ice age cycles? Is it purely pseudoscience? What about the pole shift? Where does it fit into the history of the expanding earth? Did the eruption of calderas have a major effect on the formation of the planet? This is getting picky, but you used the figure of 300,000 km/sec for the speed of light when the correct speed is 299,792,458 m/sec (among other estimates). To be taken seriously by any member of a scientific community, I think it would have been better to use the most accurate notation possible. But again, I'm nitpicking on this one. What is keeping the central sun from emanating radiation and UV rays at a consistent rate? Would life be possible in such a contained environment? Again, would there not have to be some way for these to escape via holes in the planetary wall? Is every planet destined to become a star? Do you believe Jupiter will one day become a second star in our solar system? I don't think you provided enough evidence to convince the reader of there being a central sun. I think Marshall B. Gardner was on the right track, explaining when the planet was forming from a nebula the central sun (star matter) was the central force keeping the spherical shape. Since its job is done once the planetary wall has expanded to the point of equilibrium, perhaps the central sun will eventually die out instead of consuming the planet? This would make sense when considering "dead planets." Why did you omit going back this far in planetary evolution? If the dinosaurs were ruling the earth before planetary expansion, how did they survive for so long if Pangaea had no oceans? Where was their source of water? If holes throughout the globe were created from the building pressure from inside the earth, wouldn't there be a borealis above every one of them from the inner sun shining through? Is there any oceanographic evidence to support your theory of sediment layers filling the holes in the planetary wall? Your theory of gaseous planets is fascinating. Is there evidence from probes to suggest there be a void beyond the gaseous planetary walls? If the central unit is attracted towards the greater mass of the surrounding atmosphere in all directions, what causes it to lose its balance and stray from the center? Are gravity and the sun the causes of aging? Is this the explanation to legends of inner earth people living to be hundreds of years old as stated in the Bible? If we were to live in the earth from this point onward, would we live 2-300 years conceivably? What evidence do you have to theorize that the race known as the Greys are our ancestors or even live in the earth? What of the ancient race of giants who are more apt for the title? In the chapter The Origins of Humanity, did you two do biblical research and study others' interpretations or is it purely speculation based on the hollow earth theory? Where does the age of Atlantis, Lemuria and the Rama Empire fall into this world history? What about Olaf Jansen's story of the Smokey God? Where did he and his father enter the hollow earth and where did they emerge from if there are no polar openings? Where did Admiral Richard E. Byrd fly to get to the hollow earth? ---------- I really enjoyed this book, make no mistake; I recommend it to anyone interested in the topic. The expanding earth theory is one that begs further investigation. We spend countless dollars exploring outer space, yet we know little of the earth beneath our feet which we walk upon.
0 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Happy Customer,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Land of No Horizon (by Kevin J. Taylor and Matthew J. Taylor)
VEry fast delivery which means that the book was packaged and ready to go the within 24 hours. Great price as well!
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|
|
