Most Helpful Customer Reviews
31 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Highly Readable US-centric Farnsworth vs Sarnoff book, June 6, 2002
This review is from: The Last Lone Inventor: A Tale of Genius, Deceit, and the Birth of Television (Hardcover)
This is a story of good vs evil, of innocent lone inventor (not 'last' surely?!) versus the best (commercially) and worst (morally) of corporate USA. It is very much an American story for an American audience, and reads as yet another vehicle for the Farnsworth family's cry for recognition. Schwartz though does not place Farnsworth so much on a pedestal, but rather creates the same relative effect by diminishing all opposition, in particular the efforts of the international TV scene and of the other US pioneers.. and this lack of balance and objectivity is the book's main failing and the reason for not awarding a higher rating. One example: Ask yourself how good was the quality of the picture on the Image Dissector compared with the Iconoscope? You won't find an answer in the book. In fact Schwartz ignores the official 'bake-off' competition in Britain in late 1936 by the BBC between Marconi-EMI's version of the Iconoscope (EMItron) and the Baird Company's technologies including Farnsworth's Image Dissector. The official result was Farnsworth's device was no match for the EMItron in a studio environment. Looking at the references gives the game away - there are no primary references for the non-Farnsworth, non-RCA material. The international scene is mostly dealt with by references to recent American popularist books. What about Kalman Tihanyi (inventor of Iconoscope, patented 1928)? Boris Rosing (Zworykin's teacher in Russia)?, Campbell Swinton (specified the electronic approach in 1908 and 1911)? Takayanagi (electronic television display demonstrated in 1926)? to name but a few. More balance please! The American audience will love this highly readable popularist book. This is flag-waving entertaining stuff. Enjoy it, but please try to understand that this is not the whole story.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Farnsworth's Quadruple Victory, September 12, 2002
This review is from: The Last Lone Inventor: A Tale of Genius, Deceit, and the Birth of Television (Hardcover)
In The Last Lone Inventor, Evan I. Schwarz shares the birth, growth and maturity of a great mind, and lends some insight into the television industry in its seminal stage. To borrow against another famous inventor's metaphor, Schwarz effectively captures the wonder of inspiration, which is but a small percentage of the process of invention as a whole. From Filo Farnsworth's potato field vision as a mere grammer school teen, to his post-war struggles against competing (and much better financed) visionaries, we see that he posessed one of those rare intellects that is capable of seeing solutions long before "normal" technically inclined people, and with far greater clarity. Farnsworth handily out-classed almost all his TV pioneer contemporaries. Schwarz' story is engaging and hard to put down until the final chapters, where the story loses its momentum a bit (the author provides follow-up on Farnsworth's less spectacular later years, which is interesting but not as intriguing as the discovery of electronic television). The book is also a fine "period piece," in that it reveals picturesque vignettes of the subject's personal life outside the laboratory. And to the author's point (and hence the book's title), it illustrates well the struggles faced by a poorly funded independent inventor, as compared to a well-paid corporate lab engineer working with far better resources. Getting back to Edison's metaphor, while the book amply portrays inspiration, it (wisely perhaps for commercial reasons) ignors much of the "perspiration" that lies between a visionary and his grail. To have explored this deeply would have rendered mundane the main theme of breakneck competitive struggle. Nevertheless, the reader does not grasp the full impact of Farnsworth's triumph until this element is considered -- Farnsworth's success was far more spectacular than even Schwarz reveals! The shortfall can be filled with minor difficulty by the lay reader, and with greater ease by those already familiar with analog electronic communication (i.e., early radio and television). In essence it is this: Normally a lab striving to invent a system of multiple components would do so in an evolutionary process. For example, given the existence of a complete, functional television transmitter, receiver, and picture display apparatus, it would be relatively simple to create, for the first time and with no existing technology from which to begin, a functional television camera. In fact, given that any three of these major elements were already functional, it would be far easier to create any one of the other three. But try to create any two, with just the remaining two from which to base experiments, and the task is exponentially more difficult -- how does the inventor tweak any part of the aparatus when he cannot be sure ALL the other elements are 100% functional? But now consider starting out with ALL FOUR elements missing! That Farnsworth leveraged his creation of electronic television from the period's crude radio technology alone, with no outside help to speak of, and in just a few years, is staggering. The "persperation" he (and by proximity, his helpers) endured must have been terrific! So buy this book. Evan Schwarz does a great job entertaining readers of both genders with a story of inspiration, romance and above all, genesis -- the creation of a wondrous invention that has impacted all of civilization. The Filo Farnsworth story ranks, in some ways, right up there with the United States' moon shot in 1969 (if my last paragraph made the point, be sure to read books about that great achievement too -- you'll be even more awed).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Why can't we learn from the past?, December 24, 2002
This review is from: The Last Lone Inventor: A Tale of Genius, Deceit, and the Birth of Television (Hardcover)
Looking for precedence in the desktop PC operating system wars? The battle for television standard supremacy is exhibit ABC! Similar to Microsoft's grab for OS hegemony in the 1980s and 1990s, RCA outmaneuvered archrivals AT&T, Westinghouse, Philco to capture the hearts, minds and pocketbooks of the American public. And while the battle was fought by the best minds Corporate America could muster, it was a lone inventor by the name of Philo T Farnsworth who gave RCA all it could handle on the innovation front, but was eventually outgunned by RCA honcho and master marketeer David Sarnoff, who perfectly played the courts to outlast the brilliant but business-challenged entrepreneur. In fact, the story is reminiscent of IBM's early 1980s investigation for a PC operating system. Computer geeks might remember that at that time Digital Research's CP/M was considered the best of breed PC operating system, and Big Blue was desperate to have it power its fledgling IBM PC. IBM execs, however, couldn't get a meeting with CP/M's inventor Gary Kildall (IBM had arranged to meet him at home, but Kildall was off flying his plane, leaving his wife Dorothy to negotiate a deal but she wouldn't sign a non-disclosure agreement.). So Big Blue sought alternatives, eventually striking a deal with Microsoft for an operating system the then infant company didn't yet have rights to (which was eventually called MS-DOS). And the rest, as they say ... is history! Sarnoff bluffed, licensed and marketed his way into the television space. Farnsworth like Kildall, was almost too bright for his own good. He thought the game would be decided by the technical merits of his product. That wasn't the case then -- nor is it now. It's not who invents the better mousetrap that wins; it's who defines, controls and spins the battle to suit his ends. It's marketing muscle not technological superiority -- as Microsoft has proven time and again. Kildall died battered and bruised (physically and emotionally) not unlike Farnsworth who passed on as a penniless and forgotten man. I could easily see this book turned into a major motion picture: Johnnie Depp in the Farnsworth role; Bob Hoskins as Sarnoff. But don't wait for the movie. This book is a page-turner -- you won't be disappointed. Farnsworth, like Kildall, can't be forgotten. It's books like this that guarantee he won't.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
