Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An ever reader to a never writer, June 3, 2002
How does one describe this book? Permit me, madam, to attempt. First of all, the main reason (in my opinion) to read "The Late Mr. Shakespeare" is, simply, the narrative (discounting the chapter containing Shakespeare's will, which was not nearly as fluid and I more or less skipped over). Robert Nye's prose is uncouth, unique, and undoubtedly true - I savored every word, and I yearn for more. Another redeeming factor of this book was the disjointedness of it all - one could lose track of the book for months, pick it up again, and begin another chapter afresh - and it would hardly make any of the difference. The chapters are almost entirely unrelated (other than with the general aging of shakespeare and progression of his life) - and all were both intriguing and delicious. I enjoyed the discussion of Shakespeare's works and the possible innuendos to other works, friends, and people - in addition to some possible spots of his inspiration and speculations on his greatest pieces. It doesn't matter to me how much is true and how much is mishmash - the fact of the matter is that it was interesting. But then, I've always had an obsession with editorials and the like, so I suppose this book was straight up my alley. And let us not forget the entirely estranged bits of the book that tie the entire image of Shakespeare together - the insults he shouted while engaging in tennis, for example. In summary, this is likely not meant to be a sit-down-and-read sort of book, but a stop-and-think-for-a-few-moments-and-move-on read. And it's both a unique and likable sort of method. Finally, the ending was satisfying. I have experienced such a delicacy in ages.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Deliciously bawdy, tender and touching, captivating, May 27, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: The Late Mr. Shakespeare (Hardcover)
Pickleherring takes one on a romp through Shakespeare's life, giving the modern reader a real feel for the life of the Bard and his times. Nye's use of the language is delightful, his timing perfect (except for what I saw as a few slow moments in the last third of tbe book), and his send-up of many of the controversies surrounding Shakespeare and his work is wonderful. I loved the use of scholarly footnotes smack in the middle of two of the most dramatic pages of the book. I laughed, I cried, and I fell in love with the narrator. A little Shakespeare knowledge is advised; it will send most of us eagerly to the reference books and to WS's works.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Nye's Second Best Novel About Shakespeare, May 26, 1999
This review is from: The Late Mr. Shakespeare (Hardcover)
"The Late Mr. Shakespeare" just published in the United States, but published last year in England is Robert Nye's second novel about Shakespeare, and his second best novel about Shakespeare. Nye's earlier novel "Mrs. Shakespeare" has not been published in the USA as far as I can tell,though it is still in print in the UK. In the earlier novel Nye has Shakespeare's wife Anne tell her story. It is a slim novel, and a good read. On the last page of "The Late Mr. Shakespeare" Nye gives the reader a list of the authors that he read and used in writing the novel. This "critic-fuel" (to borrow a term from Alasdair Gray) is what I found most interesting about the book. No doubt scholars and critics will be able to identify Nye's sources. I will just mention a few examples: Robert Reynolds, the narrator, also known as Pickleherring is from E. K. Chambers' "Elizabethan Stage," volume 2, p.336. The historical Reynolds was an actor, but had no professional relationship with Shakespeare. He and his wife Jane were indicted for non-attendence at church 1616 and 1617. Pickleherring was the name by which he was known in Germany. The other actors Nye mentions are also listed in Chamber's book. Shakespeare's first job in London, horse-holding at the theatre is from Johnson's preface to Shakespeare's plays. The chapter on Tom O'Bedlam comes from an essay by Robert Graves. The chapter on the plague in London during the year 1665 is from Defoe's "Journal of the Plague Year." I could go on, but I think you get my point. Some have said that the more you know about Elizabethan England the more you will enjoy this book. That's not quite correct. The more you know about Shakespearean facts, traditions and legends, the more you can sift through the impossible, the plausible and the factual of Nye's book. Is this mixture of impossible, plausable and factual entertaining? For me knowing where Nye gathered his materials was distracting. Now I am sure that most of Nye's readers have not read the large scholarly biographies of Shakespeare by Halliwell-Phillips, Chambers, or Fripp, but I have, and I prefer their versions of Shakespeare to Nye's.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|