Best Books of the Month Shop Costumes Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon $5 Albums All-New Fire TV Stick with Voice Remote Grocery Introducing Handmade New Kitchen Scale from AmazonBasics Amazon Gift Card Offer hog hog hog  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 Kindle Voyage  McCartney Shop Now Retro Toys Deal

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.

Lectures on Negotiation Analysis

1 customer review
ISBN-13: 978-1880711095
ISBN-10: 1880711095
Why is ISBN important?
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
More Buying Choices
1 New from $250.08 8 Used from $56.99
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

Save Up to 90% on Textbooks Textbooks

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Paperback
  • Publisher: Program on Negotiation at (February 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1880711095
  • ISBN-13: 978-1880711095
  • Product Dimensions: 0.2 x 8.2 x 10.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #5,438,484 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful By Phil Martin on January 11, 2000
Format: Paperback
As a reviewer, I owe potential readers the disclosure of a deep-seated personal bias. I have the greatest respect for Howard Raiffa, for his academic contributions, as well as for his worldly achievements such as his pivotal role in the creation and enlightened leadership of the Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Laxemburg, near Vienna, Austria--probably the only institution that insured a sustained, open, and fruitful dialogue between the West and the East during the coldest periods of the Cold War.
While most aware of my bias, I give a five star rating to this modest collection of class notes. Indeed, while the form--commented transparencies--qualifies as humble, while the content could appear as naïve, and while academics constitute his primary audience, Raiffa provides deep, wise, operational insights useful to all people engaged in negotiation--i.e., most of us--throughout the 111 pages that make up these lecture notes.
The key to the originality of this surprisingly homogenous scholarly piece resides with Raiffa deciding to assume the opposite of what most of us would entering a negotiation. Indeed, Raiffa assumes a Full Open and Transparent Exchange (FOTE) of information between the parties taking part in a negotiation. Lifting the veil of secrecy enables Raiffa to pinpoint what often preempts satisfactory negotiation outcomes and to discuss ways and present methodologies that allow the parties engaged in a negotiation to all get better deals. How can we achieve this? By identifying the efficiency frontier and by coming closer to it and, hence, to optimal deals. Most methodologies rely on the ranking and quantification of the respective, relative preferences of the parties in the negotiation.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again