Most Helpful Customer Reviews
35 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Legendary Lover Continues Johnson's Erotic Style, May 2, 2000
This review is from: Legendary Lover (Mass Market Paperback)
Legendary Lover continues author Susan Johnson's highly sensual and erotic romance style and, like the others in the Duras family series, this one sizzles with sex from beginning to end. Pasha Duras' daughter Venus is similar to Daisy Black in another of Johnson's series on the Braddock-Black family. Venus is independent and wealthy enough to thumb her nose at society and do as she pleases in and out of bed. Like many of Johnson's female leads, she has an interest in more than just society life. Jack Fitz-James, young and cut somewhat out of the same mold as Trey Braddock Black, is the rich and sexy Marquis of Redvers, a notorious rake. The book plot, a little weaker than her other books but still good, is propelled largely by steamy sex as the two try to avoid marriage to each other and any other suitors. You definitely don't have to read the previous two books in the series to enjoy this offering. As always, Johnson incorporates a heady use of elegant and sophisticated vocabulary to create her scenes and her dialogue entices with its brevity, laced with innuendo and suggestive spice.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
23 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Johnson does what she does best..., May 4, 2000
This review is from: Legendary Lover (Mass Market Paperback)
Jack Fitz-James and Venus Duras are stunningly attractive, wealthy, independent, and bored, bored, BORED! Bored with popular society and it's aimless pursuits. Bored with the countless members of the opposite sex who throw themselves at them. Bored with the love affairs that they have both had. And then...Venus and Jack meet. Sparks fly. Clothes are thrown off. A torrid love affair begins. And Venus and Jack begin to wonder - is this just lust? Or is the irrestible pull they feel toward each other something more...? Why do I enjoy reading Susan Johnson's books? Is it for the labyrinthe stories? The deep and moving characters? No, no, no! It's for the erotic and imaginative love scenes - and this book has them (plenty of them). No one writes witty repartee between lovers better than Johnson does, and there is plenty of that here, too. The previous Duras family books are my favorite of Johnson's novels, and this one is right up there with the other two. I don't mean to sell this book short. Ms. Johnson does research her novels well (her books are the only romance novels I know of that have footnotes). And there is a story, of sorts. But really, you won't care because the love scenes, and the lovers, are so hot and so much fun. If you're looking for a fast, sexy, and witty romance, this is the book for you. Thanks to Ms. Johnson for an entertaining read!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
About the use of certain words..., July 30, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Legendary Lover (Mass Market Paperback)
While I do not like the work of Susan Johnson, I feel obliged to defend her use of certain vulgarisms in this book about the Regency era. The F word is known to have been in use since the 1400s. Back then, it meant to destroy or spoil. Its use to describe the act of copulation has been in existence since the late-1600s. The C word is even older than the F word, and has been in use since the early 1300s. So, contrary to what various reviewers have said previously, Ms. Johnson IS entirely accurate to have Regency era characters use these words, vulgar as such may be. Information about the historical appearance of English words is available in the book, English through the Ages, by William Brohaugh. It was published in 1998 by Writers Digest Books.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|