Most Helpful Customer Reviews
54 of 57 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
You Get What You Pay For, November 22, 2007
After 16 years of retail photography equipment sales I've demoed hundreds, if not thousands of cameras to purchasers. When I decided to invest in my own digital camera my criteria was to purchase a camera that was built solid, had an easy to use menu, excellent picture quality, the best optical lineup available, compact, unobtrusive and a bright simple viewfinder. Price was not going to be THE issue because I wanted to purchase a camera I would keep and not fall into the throw away world that has been created by the electronics industry.
I had read the initial reviews of the camera and the howling by Leica film traditionalist and non-users about the IR issue. For those of you not familiar with the camera Leica opted to omit the infrared blocking filter on the sensor to maintain optimal sharpness when using the superb Leitz lenses. The omission of this filter causes some black synthetic fabrics to appear maroon in color. Leica opted to give purchasers of this camera two IR cut ultraviolet filters to put on the front of the lens to solve the problem. Leicas solution also caused Leica tradionalist to complain about putting a filter on the front of the lenses and although many of them had a standard uv on their lenses already this was made an issue that went way beyond its applications.
I have been involved with film infrared photography for years and saw the potential IR capabilities of this camera as a benefit. No more loading, unloading and handling IR film in total darkness was a definite added bonus in a camera that already produced superb color and black and white images. That has proven to be true over the 8 months I've owned this camera.
A major plus for the M8 is its simple and easy to use menus. I've witnessed so many potential purchasers of digital cameras roll their eyes when I start to demonstrate the convoluted menus and seen so many photographers miss a shot because they were trying to access a feature they needed. My only suggestion for improvement would be to include the choice of image type and saturation with the working "set" menu that way you would have everything regarding exposure under one roof.
I've used Leica rangefinder cameras for years and am used to using a rangefinder in all types of photography situations, but rangefinders are not for everyone and I would highly suggest that anyone considering this camera, who has no experience with rangefinders and is presently using an SLR, to find a dealer where you can either rent the camera or return it within a time period if you are not happy with it. It is not for everyone.
I'm more than happy about my investment in this camera, have not experienced any of the complaints I've read about it, appreciate the added bonus of the IR potential and if I have any complaints it is about the shutter sound that one user likened to a nail driver gun. Leica please try to make the M8 shutter as quiet as your film cameras.
I highly recommend this camera to anyone who can afford an investment into a superb digital camera that will not be a throw away, who have a collection of Leica lenses and want to go digital and anyone interested in the simplicity and photographic involvement in using a Leica rangefinder.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
29 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Digital For Film Lovers, February 28, 2007
This digital Leica is more like a traditional film camera than a digital camera. You must be totally in control of focus and exposure, change lenses rather than zoom, and THINK when you shoot. The images that result can be stunning. After 40 years of shooting with Leicas and loving every moment of it, this was an exciting break through. It is a real Leica camera that just doesn't use film. It is expensive, but some things are worth the money. This camera is worth it if you are a Leica shooter and wish to use your wonderful lenses on a ditigital camera. My lenses were purchased in 1969 as a college graduation gift and work just fine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
37 of 46 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
No such thing as perfection in the digital age?, July 25, 2007
I commend Leica for developing the M8 for the enjoyment of the small but loyal rangefinder community. The only thing I will say about SLR vs rangefinder is that what the rangefinder can do what it does exceptionally well. But the photographic community has recognized SLR's are far more flexible and I suspect every M8 owner has an SLR for what the rangefinder doesn't do.
Why only 3 stars? In general, the design has not addressed M issues of the past. Battery and memory card access from a non-hinged baseplate is silly. Multiple frameline display is a poor compromise. I would have liked to have seen a "zoom" finder buit into the body. Ths would allow projection of a dedicated frame line of consistant size regardless of the lens focal length. I would keep the frame line preview option though. A light booster or LED for the frame line for low light situations is also not present.
New issues. The shutter, motor advance noise, and trigger release are crude when compared to the quiet silky feel of the M2. Not providing a cover for the LCD is a great oversight. The option to use AA or other standard size battery is frustrating. While I have not come across a need for the IR-UV cut filters, promised but not yet rec'd, I'm frustrated sizes for out of production lenses are not offerred. The same comment applies to bit coding (although I'm not sure how important this is). On the one hand the marketing pitch is to the loyal Leica user, but on the service and support side we are only interested in customers that buy the current products.
Having said all of that, the feel and size are great. As with all of the Leica rangefinders it is an unsurpassed street shooter.
The build quality is of course superb, at obvious cost. I fear that in the rapidly developing digital age (non standard memory formats, detector formats, batteries) investment in the M8 may not yield the long term payback enjoyed by the prewar and M Leicas of the past. Hopefully the M8 has been designed for the ease of future upgrades and modifications. If not, perhaps a lower cost (lower quality) digital body M would have been a better option for the consumer.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2115|R2V9L1AL7MROTY;2115|R3QTXZFGKQJDK5;2115|R1NZ3HHB9B7XTL;
|