2014 Electronics Holiday Gift Guide
1 used from $3,995.00

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:
  • Leica 50mm f/2.0 SUMMICRON-M Black Lens for M System
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player
      

Leica 50mm f/2.0 SUMMICRON-M Black Lens for M System

by Leica

Available from these sellers.
  • Includes "6-bit code" which allows the digital M8 camera to identify which lens is being used, and also to store this information in image metadata
  • The "classic" choice for an M-Leica normal lens
1 used from $3,995.00

Technical Details

  • Brand Name: Leica
  • Lens Type: 35mm

Read about our customers' top-rated lenses and cameras on our review pages: Lenses, Digital SLR Cameras, Compact System Cameras

Product Details

  • ASIN: B00007LKHY
  • Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: October 2, 2001

Customer Reviews

4.8 out of 5 stars
5 star
3
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

21 of 22 people found the following review helpful By Ricardo on February 7, 2005
I don't know either, but I can't think of any sharper ones...even from Leica.

About a year ago I bought this lens along with a used Leica M6 body. It was a gift to myself for reaching a goal and I've never regretted the expense one bit.

My primary 35mm camera system is Nikon. Certainly not a second-rate system optically. I've used Nikkor lenses for about 30 years and have never found them lacking.

However, I had occasion to shoot the same subject using the Leica 50mm Summicron and a Nikkor 50mm f1.4 AIS.

I had no intention whatsoever of comparing the two lenses. As it turned out, when I put both transparencies (Provia 100F) on the lightbox, I was able to see a slighly crisper image from the Summicron slide. I was using a 4x Rodenstock loupe.

Frankly, the difference I saw wouldn't have convinced me to spend four times the price of the Nikkor lens for the Summicron. At enlargements up to 8x10 or so, the difference would be negligible...at best.

At that point, curiosity got the best of me and I decided to scan both slides using a Nikon Coolscan V ED dedicated film scanner and compare the results at higher magnifications.

Again, at moderate magnification there was little difference. It was only when blown up to a screen size that would equal about an 11x14 print that I started to see a big difference. At a 16x20 equivilent, it was no contest. The Summicaron simply showed more fine detail. Especially in the corners.

I saw no major difference in color accuracy. Contrast was similar, with the Summicron having a slight advantage.

It was only when I took the magnification up to where it would equal a 20X30 inch print that the Summicron image became unacceptable.

What does this prove?
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful By kkrome25 on July 7, 2007
When Leica began making lenses for 35mm format, their people knew that the lens has to be able to extract as much information from the tiny 35mm film as possible. What they produced is capable of rendering incredibly sharp photographs, and at the same time, provide beautiful out-of-focus (bokeh), practically no distortion of any kind, be about 40-50% smaller than a 50mm slr lens, has the right amount of contrast, and no vignetting. The photographs made from this lens looks like something made with a medium format Hasselblad. I kid you not.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful By John Kwok HALL OF FAMEVINE VOICE on July 16, 2005
The current Leica 50mm f2 Summicron-M lens is optically unchanged from the late 1960s version made in Wetzlar, Germany, though it has more multicoating than its predecessor (I own a Wetzlar-made Summicron which produces excellent images, but it still falls behind the Contax Zeiss 50mm and 45mm Planar lenses with respect to both optical quality and performance. EDITORIAL NOTE: I also own both Zeiss Planar lenses, and have found from past experience, that they are slightly better wide open than my Wetzlar-made 50mm Summicron lens.). It is also a bit bulkier, since it has a built-in lens shade which some users have told me isn't really that good in protecting against flare. I'm sure that this lens is a fine image maker, but those interested in optically better 50mm lenses for Leica M mount rangefinder cameras should considered either the expensive Leica 50mm Summilux-M ASPH which has both a built-in lens hood and focusing tab (The current 50mm Summicron doesn't have a focusing tab.) or the new Zeiss 50mm f2 ZM Planar, which is now nearly a third of the price less than that for a brand new 50mm Summicron-M lens. I hope Leica will eventually upgrade this Summicron lens so that its performance is on par with both the Leica Summilux-M ASPH lens and the Zeiss Planar.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Charles W. Holley on January 30, 2013
Verified Purchase
The same quality you expect being Summicron lens from Leica.Fast f 2..allowing being able to work under more adverse light conditions,
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again