Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
31 of 34 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Pass the Viagra!! Retirement heaven ... or hell?, May 25, 2008
"Leisureville" is an interesting view of a growing trend: age-restricted retirement communities. Author Andrew Blechman - not yet of retirement age - focuses mainly on the mega-retirement community of The Villages outside of Orlando, FL. Living amongst the natives, he offers a sociologists perspective on the pro's and con's of such manufactured communities, with their endless golf, amenities, sunshine, canasta and surprising amounts of geriatric sexual randiness.
Pro's and con's but .. it is clear that Blechman feels the cons predominate: no sidewalks, no diversity, no kids - an artificial Truman Show-like living arrangement that rings hollow. He decries the fact that these oldsters have tuned out from society, pursuing their own visions of retirement escapism from the problems of the world.
Though I understand where he is coming from, the beauty of a free society is that people can opt to choose this lifestyle or not. Choice is paramount. No one frog-marches oldsters to such communities or forces then to remain there if they find it suffocating. Most don't. Most of the characters in Leisureville seem to have few regrets. Life is full of tradeoffs.
Society says to old people, "It's all about youth - you don't matter!" Society worships youth and marginalizes older folks. Hedonistic escapism is hardly the sole province of the aged. Oh, I get it - it's OK for youth and the Lexus-obsessed middle aged. It's just not OK for grandma and gramps. Can we begrudge them if they heed society's marginalization by seeking their own version of community - even if from the vantage point of our youth or comfortable middle age, it seems like a vision of hell?
Maybe our - and Blechman's -- perspective will change once we are old enough to walk a mile in their shoes.
|
|
|
26 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting but a bit too biased, July 13, 2008
I have lived in The Villages for over 5 years and I'm a Social Psychologist (PhD) and physician (MD). After reading a review of Blechman's book in the Boston Globe and seeing an editorial by him in the Los Angeles Times, I was prepared not to like his book and to write a scathing review.
After reading Leisureville, and personally knowing some of the people he interviewed, I find my opinion of his work to be somewhat mixed. There is much about his book that is well done. And there is much that is poorly done from the standpoint of even handed social science.
Blechman never claims to be a sociologist or psychologist or anything other than an author with a firmly entrenched point of view, viz.: age segregated communities are bad. He not only doesn't like The Villages (pop. c75,000)(www.thevillages.com), he doesn't like Sun City either. He also doesn't like the lifestyle in retirement communities. He lets you know this in the first short chapter where he bemoans the loss of his neighbors who are moving to The Villages. By page 9, he asks "How could two bright individuals be drawn to something as seemingly ridiculous as The Villages?"
As you read through the book he tries to make the point that homogeneous communities without a diveristy of age, class, lifestyle, interest, etc. are intrinsically bad. His last chapter is a summary of his position based on his non-scientific observations of The Villages, Sun City, and Youngville. Biased as his outlook is, there is still a lot in the middle that makes his book worth reading.
There are research data which support some of his positions. Homogeneous communities do not support tolerance and understanding. They tend to increase 'groupthink' and insularity. When a group is ideologically homogeneous the positions adopted by its members tend to become more inflexible and more extreme. This leads to less tendency to compromise or debate and more reactionary thinking.
Do we need to worry about the social and political effects of ageism because of age segregated communities? Do religiously segregated communites like Ave Maria or fundamentalist Mormon communities threaten civil liberties? Are gay/lesian communities a threat to life in America? How far do you want to take Blechman's rejection of homogeneous communities.
Some of the things he writes about regarding The Villages are right on the mark. Its daily newspaper is, indeed, a joke. It is so right wing that it presents Ann Coulter as an intellectual and fosters several local columnists who emulate her style.
The governance system using the Community Development Districts and their control by the developer are, in truth, a black spot on the body politic. There is little organized opposition to the status quo outside of the 5000 member Property Owners Association
Much of the rest of Blechman's book is actually pretty accurate. We do go everywhere in our golf carts, we do have wonderful restaurants, over a thousand clubs/interest groups, lots of golf at very reasonable prices ($20-30 per round on championship courses), pools,
dances, entertainment in the villages squares, opera, theater, concerts, recreation centers, good friends, neighborhood parties, etc.
Blechman does spend a bit too much time on sex in The Villages and his sources of information are not particularly representative. Sexually transmitted diseases are reportable and statistics are kept by county health departments. I have not treated an excessive number of STDs and I have not seen health department data suggesting that they are particularly prevalent in retirement communities in general or The Villages in particular. I find Blechman's emphasis on the topic of sexuality to border on pandering.
The author is good at wordcraft. Despite his obvious bias he raises some interesting questions about The Villages and about age segregated communities in general. If you want to know more about The Villages, come for a visit rather than make your mind up based on this book.
|
|
|
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Entertaining and Informative But Also Preachy and Judgmental, July 1, 2008
I had mixed feelings about this book, so I'm not surprised to see strongly
positive and negative reviews. On the one hand, it's an eye-opening and
fascinating introduction to retirement communities. Readers who don't know
how they began or just how vast and ambitious they can be will get a sense of
it here. For that alone, it's worth reading.
On the other hand, the author's disapproving view of these communities
undercuts his reporting and makes some of it unreliable. He states
forthrightly in Chapter One that he doesn't understand how seemingly bright
people could be drawn to something as undeniably kitschy as The Villages
(the community he focuses on). He never tries very hard to achieve
enlightenment on this key point.
At times, his tone is snarky. In numerous instances, when he asks a
question of inhabitants of The Villages, their fatuous response begins with
the word "Gosh." Is it really likely that so many different people spoke
that way? Or is that just how he heard them all? And are the activities at
The Villages mainly just line-dancing and bingo? Among the 75,000 residents
and hundreds of activity groups, he couldn't find one dealing with, say,
books or art?
He did manage to devote a section to the community's lone transsexual,
probably just to highlight the oddness of it amidst the kitsch. Fun reading
but not exactly balanced reporting.
More substantively, he seems to regard the senior citizens at these
childless, school-free, low-tax retirement communities as violators of a
social compact. They've abandoned the full-service communities up North
that sustained them throughout their lives, he feels, not fulfilling their
duty to stick around and support the next generation spiritually and
financially. He makes this point throughout the book, with a somewhat
preachy cumulative effect.
His argument, though not without some merit, is flawed. These retirees
have, after all, paid taxes their whole lives. And many have their life
savings wrapped up in their homes. If they want to sell and retire after a
life of hard work, where can they live on the proceeds? A tiny apartment
somewhere? Their quality of life might be quite poor if they tried to
survive on social security and savings in many towns and cities. In most
cases they are not going to be taken in by family to live surrounded by
adoring grandchildren. Suddenly The Villages look a little better.
Blechman is weirdly oblivious to the hardships and needs of the elderly,
particularly widows and widowers. He presents an airbrushed, romanticized
picture of "real life" in his New England community, all the while sneering
at the tacky communal activities of senior citizens in The Villages.
This is a good but flawed book. With a little less bias and a slightly less
hectoring tone, it could have been a much better one.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|