I can think of no other scholar alive today who can rival Paul Gottfried's encyclopedic knowledge of conservatism. For over 30 years, Gottfried has written several books and numerous articles on conservatism in the American and European traditions. (Many of these have been written in French and German as well as English, a testimony to his mastery of the necessary languages.) No one matches the erudition and study that Gottfried has devoted to conservatism.
Yet Gottfried has not only forged an impressive oeuvre on this subject. He has also courageously and brilliantly challenged all the distortions that pass for conventional wisdom on the meaning of conservatism today. For this reason, his new book on Strauss is a necessary as well as significant contribution to the literature. The vast majority of established conservatives in both politics and academe today in North America and beyond have uncritically accepted Strauss and his numerous followers as "true" conservatives, and, in turn, have endorsed their reinvention of conservatism (often known as "neoconservatism") as the real McCoy. In turn, most leftist critics of Strauss portray him and his epigones as right-wing radicals. Gottfried's book on Strauss firmly rejects both charges and makes a powerful and trenchant case against the popular belief, promulgated by Strauss's friends and detractors, that authentic conservatism is identical with wars for American hegemony abroad. Instead, Gottfried incisively contends that Strauss was a consistent defender of Cold War liberalism and its attendant credos of universal liberty and equality for all, who exhibited almost no sympathy for the traditional (Burkean) conservative tradition that opposes metaphysical generalizations about the "timeless" human desire for freedom and democracy.
This book is no polemic, however, against Strauss and his students (sadly, polemics are far too common in this ideologically charged debate). I am very impressed by the fairness and balanced judgement that Gottfried applies to his subject. He clearly respects the prodigious learning of Strauss, and does not fault the master for every rhetorical excess in which his students have often indulged. In short, this book is neither a whitewash nor a smear job. Gottfried's study is an essential corrective to the mystification that surrounds the meaning of Strauss's persistent influence in our time. Most importantly, he shows what true conservatism is supposed to represent--a humbling philosophy that preserves the traditional integrity of societies without embracing dreams of social engineering on a global scale.