Jewish Terror Activities: - bombing of King David Hotel (1946) - murder of Count Folke Bernadotte (1948) - murder of Lord Moyne (1944) - Deir Yassin Massace (1948) - Cairo-Haifa Train Bombings (1948) - bombing of British Police Station in Haifa (1947) - bombing of Egyptian, Syrian, and Jordanian Airforces (1967) - Operation Susannah/Lavon Affair (1954) - invasion of Sinai (1956) - Operation Grapes of Wrath (1996) - Air Strikes on Qana, Lebanon (2006)
Remarkable, once again an attempt to discuss the Israeli states actions over a period of some decades is hijacked by someone wishing to direct people to a bizarre anti Muslim hate site. Strange how that keeps happening, only thing missing was the normal 'anti Semitic' label directed at everyone not backing that state 100%. Excellent post there, a strong contender for cliché of the week. Don't suppose you want to discuss any of the actual events or are facts not your forte?
You can call Israeli actions terrorism or preventive attacks or whatever. This does not change the fact, in my humble opinion, that ANY nation has the right to defend itself against what it perceives as an imminent threat to itself or it's citizens.
As far as 9/11, USS Cole, Israelis being caught on the GWB, bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut: if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, its a DUCK, stupid ;)
Wood, as is so often the want of you and your ilk, you have spread the definition of a word so thin, in order to hang it around the neck of the Jewish state to render it near meaningless. Orwell would be proud. You should be right at home with the 9/11 Conspiracy nuts and the other Protocol fans.
Nope I'll leave that to you old boy, never involve myself in anything that the mad colonial cousins get up to when they've been injesting 'Indain herb' or whatever else it is that convinces you chaps that Iraq and Cuba were/ are just waiting to pounce on the U.S. and batter in into submission and Isreal are using the vast amounts of munitions you foist on them to send flowers to the neighbours.
Yup! Those Romans were a right shower as well so that makes it all ok for anyone else to support genocidal and totalitarian regimes in all. I follow the thinking, mad and dnagerous but I see where you are coming from.
Mr. Wood, either your inclinations or your ignorance is showing. Totalitarian? By what definition of the word? Genocidal? Last time I checked the Palestinian population it was growing apace; for a fiendish group able to seize the reigns of power in Washington and control all the halls of power it seems the Jew have a lot to learn about this whole genocide thing. Somewhere, Wood, your countryman Orwell is weeping.
You were refering to my comment about U.S. policy and not specifically about Palestine in the last one of yours that I commented on, do try to keep up. Orwell was English, I'm not so we'll add that to your growing wrong list.
I mentioned U.S. foreign policy, you replied to that and mentioned the British Empire I replied to that and chucked in the Romans referring back to U.S. policy which has been stunningly consistent in supporting genocidal and totalitarian regimes (See Morocco for one that you seem to be quite keen on) and all of a sudden you bring back Israel as the only one I could be talking about. Murderous though their policy is I wouldn't call them genocidal... more into yer Ethnic cleansing. Pretty consistent and upfront on their liking for ethnic cleansing, bit like your friend on here who was getting all moist imaging a world without Muslims I wouldn't put it past some of the more right wing Israeli groups to go for the genocide option if they could but not state policy at the moment. Always a bit strange that the Muslim religion gets all this grief when by a massive percentage the worst atrocities committed against Judaism has been by those following the Christian religion aint it? I am British but I'm not English, Orwell was English and I am therefore not one of his countrymen.
Wood -- you sophistry boggles the mind; Orwell was English but not British? Doubtless would come as news to him. Britain is not a country? How curious. That said, the same problems apply; Morocco as a totalitarian regime committing genocide? As mentioned before, such sentences prove Orwell's worst fears about the death of language.
How curious. How strange for all those traveling about on British passports. As far as being priciplaity [sic] what good news that must be for crowned price charles! How fortunate that you are not English, it must then be a second language. From Wikipedia: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (also known as the United Kingdom, the U.K., or Britain) is a country to the north-west of mainland Europe.
In actual fact for some years now it has been a European Union passport issued by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland so if they are cutting about with British passports then they are almost certainly out of date and they will not be getting too far on their travels. The little article is from Wikipedia and I wouldn't trust them to tell me how long to boil an egg for. I refer you to the union of the crowns 1603 and the union of the parliaments 1707. As previously stated Great Britain is a union of two nations and a principality, the U.K. includes those plus (if I remember right) the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands. The U.K. and Northern Ireland includes all these and Northern Ireland.
Wales is the Principality of the Union. English is my second language (Doric being my first) and the head of State for the Union is also the head of state for a few other joints such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc, so does that make Russel Crowe my countryman?
I don't know, does he travel on a British passport? Every protestant from Northern Ireland I know screams to high heaven of how proud they are to be British, how unfortunate they lack the benefit of your corrective wisdom. Too think, Great Britain a country! Should word get out, think of all those poor out of work British Ambassadors! It is to weep.
Inside the front cover of every Orangeman from N.I's passport it will say rather prominently European Union, below that it will say United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and no matter how much time they spend painting Union flags all over the place, shouting no surrender and beating up Roman Catholics this will not change. Neither will it change the fact that Scotland, England and Ireland have always been legally distinct countries as enshrined in the various acts. By your thinking we now have everyone in Europe as countrymen possibly joined by those of other nations where Queen Elizabeth II is the head of state and the outside chance of being joined by anyone whose first language is English. As far as embassies go why would they be out of work? Would they close down all the French embassies when they found out they represented the overseas interests of Monaco, the Spanish ones who represent Andorra or the negate the country status of the U.S. as their consular activities are or have been represented by other nations embassies in some locations?
Not really surprised that you've found yourself on the same side as the Orangeman of N.I. though, bigotry does have the habit of flocking to the same dark corners.
A data base of Jewish terrorism is a great idea. It could fit on even a small PC. Of course, for a data base of Arab terrorism, you would need a mainframe. Next time you board an airplane, think of how much it is all the fault of the Jews.