This book draws on research in presenting a language teaching program based on the use of "prefabricated language." It shows that the "lexical phrase" can serve as an effective basis for learning English.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent Book with Outstanding Practical Application,
This review is from: Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching (Oxford Applied Linguistics) (Paperback)
I bought this book because it was extensively referenced as a seminal book in its field by nearly every other book I have read on the subject. I'm glad I did. It's an excellent aid for teachers of English, especially for teaching English as a Second Language. The first half of the book deals with theories of language learning and teaching, but the second half gives great practical tips for helping students understand how to use "chunks" of language as shortcuts to organizing their own discourse, and as aids in understanding the discourse of others. The chapter on learning more efficient ways of comprehending classroom lectures is one that is especially useful for students. I've used many ideas from this book in my classes with GREAT success.You do need a basic understanding of applied linguistics in order to read this book, but I found that it was well worth the extra effort it took to work my way through some of the more difficult concepts in Part I. By the time I got to Part II, which focuses on the more practical aspects of classroom application, I was glad I did. I loved this book!
12 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A messy mishmash of selfcontradictory nothing,
By A Customer
This review is from: Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching (Oxford Applied Linguistics) (Paperback)
I'm shocked this got a good review in the TESOL Quarterly. It's really pretty awful. The basic idea is that a phrase such as "If I were you..." is psycholinguistically distinguishable from "If I were the king..." because the former has a pragmatic function (giving advice) and was therefore selected to be used as a "formula" or an unanalysed chunk. The idea is interesting, but he does an awful job of presenting it. The book is filled with contradictions. For a phrase to gain the status of being a "lexical phrase" it must have a function, and it has a pragmatic function if Natinger says so, and not otherwise. Thus "a ___ ago" has the "function" of expressing time relations, and so gets to be a lexical phrase. Likewise "How do you do?" has the function of greeting. But "Have a nice day" is not a lexical phrase, but rather a cliche, because the function of "saying goodbye" for some reason doesn't count. It's ironic that a man who teaches others how to communicate in English is himself barely capabale of this task.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|