Customer Reviews

Lexington and Concord: The Beginning of the War of the American Revolution

5 star:		(10)
4 star:		(2)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

As far as I'm concerned, there are two essential books for the general reader interested in Lexington and Concord and the events of April 19, 1775. This is one of them. Tourtellot's attention to detail and his particular focus on Parker, Hancock and Adams adds some real human dimension to the standard history. He writes with clarity and insight and doesn't fall into the trap of easy characterizations. His portrayal of Thomas Gage is layered and complex, just like the man. By the way, the other essential book is David Hackett Fisher's "Paul Revere's Ride," which is a much more recent work.

The title of this review gives you an idea why this book is such an enjoyable reading experience. Although the book gives a detailed analysis of the fighting at Lexington and Concord, and the British retreat back to Boston, it is not just another military history. Mr. Tourtellot provides such intimate detail, and he quotes from sufficient primary sources, that you feel you've come to know the famous, such as Sam Adams and John Hancock, and the everyday people that lived in Lexington and Concord and got swept up in the events of April 19th, 1775. Considering that the book is about such a serious subject, it is also surprisingly funny.....up until the shooting starts. This is certainly a case of farce turning into tragedy. If you'll pardon the pun, General Gage was such an engaging fellow that he made it clear that he wanted the Colonials handled with kid gloves. Again, up until the shooting started, the British were quite accomodating. They were very polite towards the populace, even when searching for weapons and powder. They went to one house and there was a room the owner wouldn't let them go into. She said that there was a woman in that room who didn't feel well, so the British didn't press the issue and didn't search the room. Of course, that was the one room in the house where gunpowder was being stored! The British excursion from Boston was a comedy of errors. It was supposed to be a surprise, but the Colonials knew all about it. There were endless delays in leaving Boston, which gave riders such as Paul Revere plenty of time to get to Lexington and Concord to warn people to hide weapons and gunpowder. Gage had given detailed orders on what he wanted done. For example, he wanted the soldiers to take confiscated musket balls, put them in their pockets, and drop them in dribs and drabs in ponds and streams. The soldiers actually found very little, since the inhabitants had plenty of time to hide things, but instead of dropping things in small quantities the soldiers pretty much dumped whatever they found in just a few areas.....making it easy for the Colonials to retrieve most of what was confiscated! You could say there was a lack of brainpower on the "hometeam" side as well.....such as tearing up the planks of a bridge leading out from Boston so that the British could not cross it, but then leaving the planks stacked up in plain sight.....so the soldiers just had to nail them back down and they were back in business! A running gag throughout much of the book is the relationship between Sam Adams and John Hancock. The author portrays Adams as a shrewd propagandist, a man who spent 10 years trying to stir up a rebellion and finally knew the big chance when he saw it. Hancock is portrayed as none-too-bright, vain, wealthy and easily manipulated by the psychologically astute Adams. Adams and Hancock were so sure the British were after them that they acted like two crooks on-the-run. Mr. Tourtellot's thesis, from going through the primary sources on the British side, is that the British couldn't have cared less about capturing the "dynamic duo." They just wanted to confiscate some cannon and gunpowder...period! To support his appraisal of Hancock as dunderhead, Mr. Tourtellot gives many examples. However, the funniest is probably when Adams and Hancock are in hiding in Lexington on the morning of April 19th, and suddenly they heard the sound of gunfire. This is what Adams was waiting for! He knew this could be used to unite the Colonies, finally, in a drive towards independence. Adams said, "Oh, what a glorious morning is this." Hancock's reaction was that he thought it was a strange time to comment on the weather! Adams (you have to wonder whether he smacked his head in exasperation) clarified the situation: "I mean what a glorious morning for America." Adams and Hancock, convinced that the British were coming (for them!) moved on to their next "safe house." Hancock had a messenger take a note to his aunt and fiancee, asking them to come and join him. Lest you think that Hancock by now might have had an inkling as to the importance of the day's events, he made sure he included in the note the following: He directed them "to bring the fine salmon that they had had sent to them for dinner." Of course, once the fighting starts, Mr. Tourtellot does not make light of matters. The British retreat towards Boston is recorded in harrowing detail...they were surrounded by superior numbers and were fighting for their survival. They sent out flanking parties to deal with snipers and the flanking parties did what they needed to do...such as burning down homes that they suspected were being used by snipers and killing able-bodied, though unarmed men, on the assumption that they were rebels. Not a bad assumption, really, when you understand that even men in their sixties and seventies were lurking in the woods, taking potshots at the British. One remarkable part of the book is where the soldiers came upon 78 year old Samuel Whittemore, who had just killed a couple of Redcoats. They shot Whittemore and beat him severely. They were satisfied that they had "killed the old rebel." Amazingly, Mr. Whittemore lived another 18 years....not dying until the ripe, old age of 96! Mr. Tourtellot also deals with the aftermath of the battle....showing how Sam Adams and others got maximum propaganda value from the day's events, exaggerating British atrocities (which were in actuality extremely rare) in order to set the Colonies on the road to independence and to influence opinion back in England. I consider this book a welcome and necessary addition to my collection of books dealing with the American Revolution.

The events of April 19, 1775, in Lexington and Concord obviously are central to the American story. In this marvelous work of narrative history, Arthur Tourtellot provides a seminal account of those events. As a visiting professor at a Boston university during the 2000-2001 academic year, I have had the good fortune of living in Lexington. I have spent many hours wandering the Minuteman National Monument, Battle Road, and the Lexington and Concord greens, with Tourtellot's book in hand. The area is quite different today then it was in 1775, of course. On the one hand, the towns obviously are much bigger. On the other hand, however, many of the cleared farm fields of 1775 are now covered with second growth forest. One cannot, for example, easily see North Bridge--let alone town center--from Punkatasset Hill. Nonetheless, Tourtellot's careful narrative makes the scene come alive. His clear telling of the story makes it possible for one to follow the action quite closely.

One of the most interesting aspects of Tourtellot's text is emphasis on the intersection of religion and politics in understanding the motivations of the population of Lexington and Concord. In particular, he puts Rev. Jonas Clarke (Lexington's town minister) at the center of the stage. As Tourtellot persuasively argues, it was Clarke's influence that led to Captain Parker's otherwise rather puzzling decision to take a stand with 60 or 70 men against hundreds of British regulars.

In sum, very highly recommended.

This book does a wonderful job at bringing home the story of the start of our armed revolution in a highly personal and interesting way.

Relying on contemporary sources, diaries and journals, Arthur Tourtellot breathes life into the battles of Lexington and Concord. I am amazed that so many and varied first person accounts of those battles exist. Usually, Lexington and Concord are presented as quick preludes to the War of Revolution -- the actors anonymous except for Gen. Thomas Gage. Tourtellot introduces local clergy, militia captains, minutemen, patriots and citizens who all combined to start the colonies on the road to independence.

Lurking in the background is Samuel Adams. His preparation of the political ground that would set the stage for the confrontation with the British is neatly summarized in this book. Other notables, such as patriot rider Paul Revere, are also given their due in this story.

This fine book gives a background on the village and attitudes of Lexington, MA leading up to the battle. The last chapters also tell how Adams, Dr. Joseph Warren and others made quick and effective use of the conflict to great effect on the minds of fellow Americans and the quite sizable segment of British public opinion who harbored at least some sympathy for the American point of view.

The heart of the book is the military confrontation. The author writes crisply and clearly, even while including fascinating narrative and first person accounts. General Gage's plan is in reaction to pressure from the Crown and Parliament to take some action to assert Royal authority over increasingly rebellious colonials. His march to Concord (through Lexington) is designed to seize American powder and arms.

Massachusetts patriots are at the ready. With an effective spy and warning system, they know of the planned action before most of Gage's junior officers. After the famous two lanterns are hung in the Old North Church, the book traces the march, marshalling of patriot forces and the encounters at Lexington and Concord that marked British initiative during the battle. The rising of a violent country-side that almost engulfed Col. Smith's British force is told in fascinating detail. But for the arrival of Lord Percy's relief force on a bluff near Lexington, Smith's retreating redcoats probably would have been overwhelmed. Percy was able to save most of the British force and lead them through a withering march to Boston -- a march where the British literally ran a gauntlet of woods and walls concealing American militiamen who were to take a significant toll on the King's forces.

This is an exciting tail that is well told. The book contains excellent maps that help the reader visualize the action and route of march. The author has succeeded in breathing exciting life into a little confrontation that wrote large upon the pages of history.

The book is a detailed chronology of the events that took place on April 19, 1775 in the Massachusetts towns of Lexington and Concord. It is also a narrative of the people, American and British, who played vital roles in the events that lead up to that fateful day when the first shots were fired commencing the War for American Independence. The book culminates with the Continental Congress's decision eight weeks later to establish a Continental Army with George Washington as its Commander in Chief. And, so as not to leave the reader wondering what happened to those whose lives were touched in one way or another by this first battle, Tourtellot finishes their stories, too.
Tourtellot goes into great detail describing both the physical landscape and political climate of America and that of Lexington and Concord in 1775, and then skillfully weaves the lives of the townspeople and their relationships, one with the other, into his story. The genealogies of the families involved, both the common folk and the major historical figures, are fascinating and add a personal touch to the history of that first skirmish. "The little group Captain Parker mustered on Lexington Common before daybreak on April nineteenth, 1775, had some of the characteristics of a family reunion" (p. 29). He makes the towns and their people come alive for the reader and adds a depth to the story that one does not get simply by reading about the Battle of Lexington and Concord from a history text or an encyclopedia. The contrasts of Samuel Adams and John Hancock make these two "larger than life" historical figures come to life in a new light. "Hancock was handsome...Adams was dumpy and palsied...Hancock...splendidly attired...Adams was so seedy that his friends had to buy him decent clothes..."(p.62). It has made this reader want to read more in depth about their lives along with those of men like Jonas Clarke, a relative of Hancock's, a pastor and political advocate of Lexington, Dr. Joseph Warren, patriot leader, Major General William Heath, the first American field commander. He does not forget an in depth look at the British and their officers in his story as their shortcomings and training play an integral part in the final outcome of this battle.
Tourtellot details the differences between the military forces of the Americans and the British and their differing military tactics. The American military was a hodgepodge of the men of the community who seldom mustered at the same time, whose leaders were chosen from the masses, and who would leave their ranks to return home to their families and fields. The British, on the other hand, were professional soldiers, with professional leaders, who marched on, whatever the odds and whatever they faced. He presents the soldiers as proper British citizens, highly mannered and considerate of the townspeople, and as their only objective, to capture and incapacitate the arms stored in Concord. However well intended the British soldiers were, a series of mis communications turned the seeming simple task into one that would enrage the colonials and add fuel to the already smoldering fire of the War for Independence. "Thus ended this Expedition, which from beginning to end was as ill planned and ill executed as it was possible to be...(Lieutenant Barker of the King's Own at his indictment" (p. 203).
Tourtellot has done extensive research in order to bring the events of the Battle of Lexington and Concord to life. The capacious "Notes" and "Bibliography" section of the book attest to his understanding of this important period in time. He has brought both sides of this conflict into perspective and offered the reader an in depth study of the story of Lexington and Concord. He has given the reader an understanding of the political, social, and emotional reasons why this conflict was so important in the birth of our nation.

Overall, I found this book to be enjoyable and easy to read. The author explains in some detail the history of the main characters as well as their culture, and he attempts to show through the history of the local residents how their ideals ultimately resulted in their armed rebellion against the British.

I especially liked the maps because they greatly facilitated my ability to follow the action in the battles. Just inside the front cover is a map titled "The Midnight Rides" which gives the reader the routes taken by Revere, Dawes and Prescott, and it also shows where they encountered the British. This map covers two pages and is large enough to show Boston and Concord. The next map, also covering two pages, depicts Percy's retreat back to Boston. At the back of the book, the author includes one page maps titled "Smith's Expedition", "The British At Lexington Common", "The British At Concord" and "Percy's Rescue Brigade" (at Lexington). These maps really helped to make the events come to life for me.

The reason I didn't rate this book higher than 3 stars is because the author apparently had a very strong dislike for Protestant Calvinism. His derrogatory comments detracted from the narrative and made me question the accuracy of his presentation of the battle. For instance, on page 31 he states that the people of Lexington "shook off the more styptic elements of the old faith while such of its last defenders as Cotton Mather were wallowing in their own absurdities". (Note that Calvinism is not absurd). He portrays the rejection of Calvinism as "a liberal and cheerful theology" and "rational" while the Calvinists "strained at theological gnats" and were mired in the "melancholy hopelessness of predestination". Among the twenty or so pages of bashing Calvinism, he erroneously states that "[t]he reactionary efforts of Jonathan Edwards had failed signally...".

And, he stated that "[s]ince the halfway covenant permitted the baptizing of the children of half members, infant baptism had already become an empty formalism; and with the failure of the short-lived revival movement, the "Great Awakening", the churches as a whole had serious likelihood of going the same way." Note that any serious student of Christianity (either Protestant or Roman Catholic) would not say that infant baptism is an empty formalism, and there is a reason the "Great Awakening" is called "Great" rather than "The Shrot-Lived Awakening". Also, Jonathan Edwards is almost universally considered America's greatest Protestant theologian.

I thought the greatest example of the author's bias was in the following contrasts. He described Calvinism as "cold", "craggy dogma", "absurdities", "melancholy hopelessness", and "old..psalm singing [with its] attrocious versifications". He also showed his ignorance of the bible by stating "Old Hancock had loved to be called "Bishop" and felt that he was fully entitled to it, because he had participated in so many ordinations, at one of which he made the startling suggestion that 'He that desires the office of a bishop desires a good work'". Well, Old Bishop Hancock's suggestion was not so startling when you read I Timothy 3:1 "This is a faithful saying: If a man desires the position of a bishop, he desires a good work".

In comparison, the author reports that Dr. Benjamin Church (member of the Provisional Congress and the Committee of Safety) "reported regularly to Gage" (the British General), and he "sold the information [about the amount and distribution of Colonial militia arms and powder]to finance an expensive mistress in Boston". But, there are no perjorative names for Dr. Church such as "traitor" [to the American cause], "Judas" or "adulterer", but I guess these concepts are just Puritan "absurdities".

These obviously biased statements,at least for me, detracted from the overally quality of the book.

The book is a detailed chronology of the events that took place on April 19, 1775 in the Massachusetts towns of Lexington and Concord. It is also a narrative of the people, American and British, who played vital roles in the events that lead up to that fateful day when the first shots were fired commencing the War for American Independence. The book culminates with the Continental Congress's decision eight weeks later to establish a Continental Army with George Washington as its Commander in Chief. And, so as not to leave the reader wondering what happened to those whose lives were touched in one way or another by this first battle, Tourtellot finishes their stories, too.
Tourtellot goes into great detail describing both the physical landscape and political climate of America and that of Lexington and Concord in 1775, and then skillfully weaves the lives of the townspeople and their relationships, one with the other, into his story. The genealogies of the families involved, both the common folk and the major historical figures, are fascinating and add a personal touch to the history of that first skirmish. "The little group Captain Parker mustered on Lexington Common before daybreak on April nineteenth, 1775, had some of the characteristics of a family reunion" (p. 29). He makes the towns and their people come alive for the reader and adds a depth to the story that one does not get simply by reading about the Battle of Lexington and Concord from a history text or an encyclopedia. The contrasts of Samuel Adams and John Hancock make these two "larger than life" historical figures come to life in a new light. "Hancock was handsome...Adams was dumpy and palsied...Hancock...splendidly attired...Adams was so seedy that his friends had to buy him decent clothes..."(p.62). It has made this reader want to read more in depth about their lives along with those of men like Jonas Clarke, a relative of Hancock's, a pastor and political advocate of Lexington, Dr. Joseph Warren, patriot leader, Major General William Heath, the first American field commander. He does not forget an in depth look at the British and their officers in his story as their shortcomings and training play an integral part in the final outcome of this battle.
Tourtellot details the differences between the military forces of the Americans and the British and their differing military tactics. The American military was a hodgepodge of the men of the community who seldom mustered at the same time, whose leaders were chosen from the masses, and who would leave their ranks to return home to their families and fields. The British, on the other hand, were professional soldiers, with professional leaders, who marched on, whatever the odds and whatever they faced. He presents the soldiers as proper British citizens, highly mannered and considerate of the townspeople, and as their only objective, to capture and incapacitate the arms stored in Concord. However well intended the British soldiers were, a series of mis communications turned the seeming simple task into one that would enrage the colonials and add fuel to the already smoldering fire of the War for Independence. "Thus ended this Expedition, which from beginning to end was as ill planned and ill executed as it was possible to be...(Lieutenant Barker of the King's Own at his indictment" (p. 203).
Tourtellot has done extensive research in order to bring the events of the Battle of Lexington and Concord to life. The capacious "Notes" and "Bibliography" section of the book attest to his understanding of this important period in time. He has brought both sides of this conflict into perspective and offered the reader an in depth study of the story of Lexington and Concord. He has given the reader an understanding of the political, social, and emotional reasons why this conflict was so important in the birth of our nation.

"Lexington and Concord" is a reprint of Arthur Bernon Tourtellot masterful and long out of print, "William Diamond's Drum". It is the essential, must-read history of the Battles of Lexington and Concord. The book is extremely well-written and a great read!

Arthur Bernon Tourtellot based his book on primary sources, describing the battles that began the American Revolutionary War, from both the British and American perspectives. More importantly, he explains why each side acted as they did and the repercussions of their actions.

The book is well illustrated with prints of most of the major actors as well as maps depicting the British march (and then retreat) to and from Lexington/Concord.

"William Diamond's Drum" is required reading for anyone interested in how the war for American Independence.

I greatly enjoyed this book. The level of detail is amazing, probably due to the fact that the Continental Congress did such a thorough job of debriefing citizens and miliita in the aftermath of the battles to present the American side of the story.

As any good book of this type is, it cites it's sources extensively.

If anyone is looking for a little more detail on the events around the Battles at Lexington and Concord, this is a good one.

This is a great book starting in Chapter 2. The author does a great job of bringing the first shots of the American Revolution to life. He does so by putting in maps of Lexington and Concord and even the paths taken by Revere and Dawes. In that sense, it is a great book to get me started on my way of many books I am reading on the battles of the American Revolution.

Now, to Chapter 1. I am not even going to go into the defense or degradation of Calvanism, as the author decided to do. In the first Chapter, I almost put down the book and decided to read it no more. Too bad the author had to put his own personal dislike for Calvanism so forceful in the first chapter. This almost takes away from a great history book that does a great job in the battles of Lexington and Concord.

Definitely a great book, but if you believe in a form of Puritanism and/or Calvanism, you will feel greatly berated after Chapter 1. Unfortunately, you probably cannot skip chapter one because it does dive into some of the main characters and how they came to live/preach in Lexington.

Chapter 2 throught the end of the book-- 5 stars.

Chapter 1 -- no stars. (More like a personal vendetta against Calvanism/Protestant religion).