Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
328 of 388 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not Even Close to the Whole Story, February 23, 2002
The writer of this book, Thomas Friedman, has impressive credentials as a globetrotting journalist and expert on international economics. I'm sure that on the job he is required to be objective and impartial. But that's not the case in this heavy-handed and very arrogant book on globalization. You may find this book informative and fun to read, but beware that you're not getting anything close to the full story on this phenomenon.Friedman's writing style is mostly conversational and easy to read, though he tends to talk about his own friends and adventures way too much. Also, Friedman can't stop making up his own terminology, like Golden Straitjacket, Electronic Herd, Globalution, Glocalism, and the especially irritating DOScapital. The problem is, Friedman merely throws these terms at numerous and scattershot examples of phenomena that may possibly lend them meaning, but fails to adequately describe them himself. Parts One and Two of this book are actually quite strong as Friedman remains mostly objective in describing the rise of globalization and where things stand today. He also includes a surprising amount of coverage on the negative effects on the environment and non-Western cultures (for the time being). Unfortunately, this book collapses into a firestorm of arrogance in Part 3, which is misleadingly titled "The Backlash Against the System." Here Friedman actually spends more time criticizing those who can't or won't jump on the sacred globalization bandwagon. He uses the derogatory term "turtles" for people who are being left behind by the new economic realities around the world, and doesn't care if it's not their fault. He demeans concern for disadvantaged peoples and countries as "politically correct nonsense" (pg. 355). Some portions of this book are getting outdated, which is not Friedman's fault, but the gaps are very revealing. Several times he cites Enron as a strong global company with the world's best interests at heart, and failed to predict the tech stock crash of 2000 and how it would drastically slow down the US-led growth of the world economy (see chapter 17). This shows that Friedman's predictions in this book are already starting to fall apart. Friedman also completely avoids the issue of corporate domination, as rulings by the pro-corporate WTO have allowed multinational companies to supersede the laws of sovereign nations (such as the blatant disregard for Nigeria's environmental laws by Western oil companies). Finally, Part Four of this book descends into anemic boosterism as Friedman tries to convince us that American culture and corporations will solve all the world's ills as peoples around the world happily embrace globalization. By this point, Friedman has left objectivity far behind. His clear contempt for those who are concerned about globalization's destructive effects, and his apparent belief that American corporations only wish to solve the world's ills, prove that he has not succeeded in telling the full story. Not even close.
|
|
|
50 of 57 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Brilliant overview of globalisation. Essential reading, December 7, 1999
A very wide ranging book written by an experienced journalist about the dilemmas created as globalisation transforms the world around our local communities and cultures. He won two Pulitzer Prizes for his reporting as bureau chief in Beirut, and it is this background from which the analogy of the olive tree comes. He explains how his career has enabled him to slowly come to see the many different dimensions of globalisation, how they link, and what we can do about it. It is a very systemic perspective. (Thurow, Lester: Building Wealth is complementary to it. Korten, David: When Corporations Rule the World provides a 1995 counterblast. Any of the books and pamphlets by Robert Theobald and also Harman, W.: Global Mind Change provide creative ideas on how globalisation can be redirected to achieve societal ans well as economic ends.) The book is in four parts. Part one explains how to look at the system we call globalisation and how it works. Part two is a discussion of how nation-states, communities, individuals and the environment interact with the system. Part three is a good look at the backlash. Part four is an even better look at the unique role of the USA in this new world. To understand and convey the complexity of what is going on, Friedman believes that he had to learn to combine six dimensions or perspectives in different ways and weights to understand the systemic interrelationships at play and then tell stories in order to explain it. This is what he does in the book. He also identifies what he believes to be the key driving forces to globalisation and the conditions necessary for a society to succeed in a globalised world. As an analysis of the multiple forces at play and their interaction, The Lexus and the Olive Tree could hardly be bettered, and the comment that we know about as much about the globalised world that is emerging as we did about the Cold War world in 1946 really resonates. I am less satisfied with Friedman's prescription, which is essentially that rape is inevitable - and may be pleasurable - so we may as well relax and enjoy it. That both under-rates the very real dangers posed by a large group of potential losers and, more important, absolves us from the need to search creatively for a third way that places more emphasis on the human spirit and sustainability and less on money as such. It is notable how much of the business literature is beginning to focus on ethics, spiritual values and moral and ethical obligations. It is also notable how rapidly the various movements to reshape the world around more fundamentally human values are building strength. The balance is not just, as Friedman seems to suggest, between globalised progress and separatist stagnation, but other options need creative development, based on wider values than those that motivate the 'electronic herd'. The conspiracy theorists claim that global business is consciously trying to promote the 'inevitability' of a system that happens to suit them very well. They would probably claim that Friedman has fallen into their trap. Whatever the truth or otherwise of a 'conspiracy', I am left with Russell Ackoff's phrase ringing in my head - 'If we don't work to get the future we want, we will have to learn to live with the future we get.' Recognising the strength of the forces that Friedman describes so well, that is perhaps the issue. Are we clear about what kind of world we want and are we prepared to work for it?
|
|
|
18 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Elucidating, but perhaps slightly biased..., August 31, 2000
Mr. Friedman is undoubtedly one of the best nonfiction writers around these days, and the variety of topics he's covered - from the conflict in the Middle East to globalization - is direct proof that the man is blessed with a solid talent for analysis. By no means am I an expert on things capitalistic, and globalization, notwithstanding the fact that I, along with everyone else on the planet, live in it, is a topic to which I hadn't paid too much attention in the past. This book served as a primer, and now that I've read it, I see some of its observations popping up everywhere around me; a lot of the things that are discussed in the book DO apply to the world around us. One point of contention, though: Mr. Friedman is very keen on making the United States the sole superpower in charge of driving the whole world. Now, I agree that the US has a very important role to play, and will do so for several years to come (barring any unforeseen catastrophes). But sometimes I get the feeling that Mr. Friedman might just be a little to pro-American, and, on occasion, this seems to blur his vision. While dubbed pro-globalization by the media, Mr. Friedman nevertheless warns us of the dangers of Americanization and what deleterious effects such a phenomenon has on the various cultures. An altogether interesting read, in which we all learn a lot from a superb mind. The experience, however, is, on occasion, marred by recurrent typos (a book on this topic should NEVER spell entrepreneur the wrong way, but it does!) and a few editorial oversights... All in all, this book has helped me better understand the world I live in and where we might end up a few decades down the road.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
Show more editions and formats
Show fewer editions and formats
by Thomas L. Friedman
by Thomas L. Friedman
See all 27 books this book cites
