When I was holding "Liar" in my hands, so excited to read it (I really like Justine Larbalestier's writing), I realized something: I didn't know how to read "Liar". How do you read a book when you actually know you may not be able to trust the narrator?
I still haven't figured it out. If you try reading it like a normal book, your mind keeps reminding you that the main character is a liar. Micah keeps reminding you that she lies. Except this, she says, is the truth.
But is?
"Liar" is about the aftermath of Micah's secret boyfriend's mysterious and brutal death. Micah swears she didn't kill him, but not everyone believes her, and why should they? Micah's an unpopular outcast, and a liar, and everyone knows it.
So is "Liar" even at all true? Or is it all one big lie?
Yeah. See my confusion?
The stuff I loved about the book?
Larbalestier's writing. I don't really number Larbalestier as one of my favorite authors, but I think that's just because none of her books are among my favorites. But I do love her writing and her ideas. All of her YA novels have stellar concepts. "Liar" is no exception. It's the execution--the plot twists--that I find shaky, but more on that latter. I just have no complaints about how Larbalestier puts a book together, neither the way she constructs her sentences or the way she pieces together the plot.
For example, "Liar" does not unfold linearly. The narrative is broken into short sections: "Before", "After", "Family History", "History of Me", etc. It keeps the story moving at a good pace, and it keeps you intrigued because you don't get the information all at once. Micah holds some important information back; it makes it easy to believe that Micah is actually telling you the story.
Micah...ah, I loved Micah's character. "Liar" is a fascinating study of a liar and a teenage girl. Micah's smart, somewhat defiant, an individual. She's an outcast, and okay with it. She likes being invisible. Despite the way she admits to being a liar, you can't help but want to believe her, to like her, to want her to overcome her lying and succeed in life because you know that she can accomplish great things. As for her lying...you get the impression that Micah lies because...not because she likes to but because she is unable to tell the truth about some fundamental part of her. (If she's to be believed, of course.) And it goes from there...she's just used to hiding herself behind falsehoods.
The other characters...I'm not going to say that they were nuanced. I don't really think that they were, but I'm not going to say they were oppressively flat or stereotypical either. Because I don't think that either. "Liar" is just very much a character study of Micah; as such, the other characters are just there to help tell the story, to explain Micah's situation. They're not really the draw of this novel like Micah is.
So why'd I only give "Liar" three stars?
I'd say that I dropped one star just because the whole unreliable narrator thing. It's hard to really connect with a book when you're always wondering if you're being told the truth.
And the second star? Remember what I said about not liking the plot twists Larbalestier's novels take? Yep. Micah's family has a big secret, and she reveals it. And when she did...the novel sort of fell apart of me. Maybe had I been expecting it, I would have been okay with it, but it seemed like the book changed gears, and I had a much harder time convincing myself to trust Micah. I will say that despite not liking the twist, I did like how Larbalestier handled it.
So basically, I'm not sure what to think about "Liar". I liked it, I did. But how much? Why? What all do I make of it? That I'm not sure.