Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
$9.97 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs)
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs) [Hardcover]

John M. Owen (Author)
4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback $22.03  

Book Description

Cornell Studies in Security Affairs November 1997
Liberal democracies very rarely fight wars against each other, even though they go to war just as often as other types of states do. John M. Owen IV attributes this peculiar restraint to a synergy between liberal ideology and the institutions that exist within these states. Liberal elites identify their interests with those of their counterparts in foreign states, Owen contends. Free discussion and regular competitive elections allow the agitations of the elites in liberal democracies to shape foreign policy, especially during crises, by influencing governmental decision makers. Several previous analysts have offered theories to explain liberal peace, but they have not examined the state. This book explores the chain of events linking peace with democracies. Owen emphasizes that peace is constructed by democratic ideas, and should be understood as a strong tendency built upon historically contingent perceptions and institutions. He tests his theory against ten cases drawn from over a century of U.S. diplomatic history, beginning with the Jay Treaty in 1794 and ending with the Spanish-American War in 1898. A world full of liberal democracies would not necessarily be peaceful. Were illiberal states to disappear, Owen asserts, liberal states would have difficulty identifying one another, and would have less reason to remain at peace.

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed


Product Details

  • Hardcover: 246 pages
  • Publisher: Cornell Univ Pr (November 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0801433193
  • ISBN-13: 978-0801433191
  • Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.2 x 0.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,757,392 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.7 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Logical and empirical supporting argument in favor democratic peace, September 23, 2011
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Brooks conducts research that shows and explains why liberal democracies are peaceful to likeminded societies. Specifically Brooks purports to show that perceptions among societal elites and the citizenry determine the likelihood that nations experiencing political conflict will go to war. Brooks cites numerous case studies from the early 18th century until the Spanish-American War to support his hypothesis. What is apparent from the research is that war is dependent on the perceptions that opposing poltical elites have regarding the level of representative governance in the adversarial nation. For example, the USA did not initiate war with Spain in the middle 18th century because Americans did not want to undermine the nascent republican government in Spain. Similarly, wars with Great Britain in the middle 18th century were averted because influential sectors of the British society viewed America's republican government as non-threatening and admirable, particularly after the elimination of slavery. In contrast, the USA went to war with Spain in the late 18th century because the monarchy had secured power from the republicans. Likewise, the US went to war with both France and Great Britain in the early 18th century because American Federalists considered the French despotic while the Republicans felt the British monarchy equally oppressive.

In sum, an interesting book that does a good job explaining the hypothesis in early chapters and later cites case studies to examine the validity and reliability of the hypothesis of liberal peace with like minded societies.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars It works, December 17, 1999
This review is from: Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs) (Hardcover)
Liberal Peace, Liberal war gives an intriguing look into the thought processes of liberal countries in concern to peaceful and conflictual relations with other countries that it sees to be either liberal or illiberal. This books give a new approach to the role of national values and institutions in shaping of foreign policy.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Liberal Peace, Liberal War, January 4, 2007
By 
K. Benner (Greenville, SC) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
Excellent work. Clearly defines how the word "liberal" is applied and how other institutions and players utitize the word to describe their posturing and tactics. Once he has you clearly understanding just exactly what "liberal" is, at least in his application, there isn't a muddy sentence in the whole work. Extremely well written, concise, no ambiguity. Clearly defines a logical path to systems of application that are rational for today's world.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Inside This Book (learn more)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
United States, New York, Great Britain, Imperial Democracy, Jay Treaty, Unwanted War, French Revolution, South Korea, Diplomacy of Annexation, American Political Science Review, Princeton University Press, South America, Henry Clay, Soviet Union, Spanish-American War, Age of Federalism, Annals of Congress, Cambridge University Press, Debating the Democratic Peace, Anglo-American Friendship, Charles Sumner, Cold War, Corn Laws, Hamilton Fish, James Madison
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:




Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject