51 of 54 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the best books on the subject, September 2, 2007
This review is from: For Liberty and Glory: Washington, Lafayette, and Their Revolutions (Hardcover)
We all know the story of the Marquis de Lafayette and his participation in the American Revolution, at least in outline. Washington had been overwhelmed by the foreign, mostly French, mercenaries who appeared at his headquarters, all offering to lead the army in his stead in return for a fortune and all of the credit for any victories. In walks a teenager, very wealthy, a bit awkward, but very willing to spend money for the cause, and insistent that he be allowed to serve in whatever capacity he's needed. The childless Washington and the fatherless Lafayette become surrogates for one another, and lead the Continental Army to victory.
James R. Gaines has a somewhat different, more nuanced appreciation of the friendship between the two men which was so crucial to the formation of the revolutions of their respective countries. This book, which follows the two men's friendship and the two revolutions they tried to lead, is very well-thought-out, and the result is an interesting, intelligent discussion of their relationship and the facets of it that reflected into the history of first our country and then France. The book is structured as a dual biography in part, and a dual history in part also, which makes it a bit confusing, but Gaines is a good writer and knows how to knit a story together, so the narrative moves along well and is interesting.
Washington comes across as the founding father we all know and love, even if we don't at this remove quite understand him any more (if anyone ever did). He's stiff, almost emotionless at times, and seemingly distant from those around him save a few intimates, but he's also supremely, almost inhumanly concerned with the welfare of his country above everything else, and willing to sacrifice everything he has personally to preserve that. Lafayette, however, emerges as more than a child who was ardently an advocate of freedom. At times, it has appeared that he was more of an adventurer than any sort of patriot or ideologue, but Gaines makes it clear that ideology was the main driving force of his actions, and that the views he expressed when he purchased a ship, filled it with goods he had also bought, and then sailed it to America, were the same ideals that he espoused 50+ years later when he visited America for the last time, and he held them throughout the period in between, never deviating from them. His devotion to Washington, as a result, winds up being more nuanced than just a search for a father-figure: he actually revered his politics, his reserve, his dignity, his self-control, and his desire to see democratic government preserved in the United States.
I enjoyed this book a great deal. I'd never heard of Mr. Gaines before, but this book is one of the better ones on the American Revolution that I've read in recent years, and it's very well done. I would recommend it to anyone even slightly interested in the subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
22 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lafayette steals the show, September 4, 2007
This review is from: For Liberty and Glory: Washington, Lafayette, and Their Revolutions (Hardcover)
James Gaines has posted quite an accomplishment with this book. Artfully he assembles a mountain of research and weaves the best pieces into a cohesive whole. You will learn fascinating things about America's founders,and also about the various factions and personalities of the French Revolution.
I thought that Lafayette stole the show. Washington was willing to risk all to bring liberty and stability to a new nation, and won. Lafayette was equally willing to risk all to bring liberty and stability to an old nation, after having already helped bring those blessings to us. Since his task was impossible, he lost. Nevertheless, his idealism and sense of duty allowed him to keep his honor.
It is rare that a work of history will engage your emotions the way this one does. Just remember, it is scholarly, lengthy, and demanding. But worth it. James Gaines is the former editor of Time magazine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Cumbersome, December 1, 2008
This interesting and challenging book closely inspects the parallel and intertwined fights for liberty that occurred in America and France during the last quarter of the 18th century. It is a very telling book describing the similar challenges faced by each as their revolutions respectively unfolded. It focuses on France's obvious contributions to American Independence, men money and material, and on America's necessary avoidance of the serial French upheaval that never seemed to quite achieve final resolution as internal warring factions murdered more French citizens than all of the casualties experienced by America, England and France combined in the US.
The author does a very good job detailing how each revolution developed its own path to completion. I was stunned to find that the French loans to America that financed our revolution so bankrupted the French Treasury that it was a prime contributor to the French Revolution. The author also does very good work describing the Federalist - Republican English and French polarization that occurred as the US sought different governmental models to negotiate the uncharted waters of self government, explains thoroughly the decided break with France after the XYZ affair and explains successive French governments disenchantment with the US as both nations moved into the 19th century. It is here that the fundamental difference between these two movements comes to the fore with the US focus remaining continental, and for the most part avoiding foreign entanglements, while France continues with the 15th, 16th and 17th century external model of European wars focused on global conquest.
The author bit off a lot here and I am thankful that he did. As a result of his significant efforts, I materially better understand the interplay between France and America for the 50 years following 1776. But in all honesty I found this book very difficult to work my way through, and in the process of doing so, found the book's structure an impediment to its effectiveness as a teaching tool: It is cumbersome. Make no mistake, this is a good work but at times it labors to make its points and provides far too much extraneous detail, unnecessary to its central theme, for it to flow smoothly. That said, just skim those parts and you have a winner.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No