Customer Reviews

In Lieu of Heaven

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

Author Kevin Archer does not identify with any specific religious group, preferring to practice Zen and meditation, and the power of the profound world view that "It takes much more will to be a man than to be a god" is unforgettably expressed within In Lieu Of Heaven, a philosophical and deftly probing novel about two men who meet in the wilderness - one of whom is on a tireless quest to meet God, while the other claims to have already done so. The crossing of their paths brings about difficult examination of each other's beliefs, and will lead the reader down a personal path of self-examination concerning the concepts of God and individual faith. An exploratory and unapologetically deconstructive narrative ponderance, In Lieu Of Heaven is an enthusiastically recommended novel -- especially for those who prefer their literary entertainment to be thoughtful and thought-provoking.

In Lieu of Heaven is a metaphorical, deeply provocative novel that I cannot help but address on two different levels, one literary and the other religious. The whole novel is framed in the mists of spirituality, as we meet one character traveling through lonesome woods in a quest for some kind of truth - ostensibly, his is a quest to find God. Out in the middle of nowhere, he comes across a beautiful garden and meets another man, one who will take his ambiguous quest in a completely new direction. It is difficult to review this book because the identity of the man in the Garden is essential to the story, yet I cannot reveal his identity without giving too much of the story away.

The man in the garden tells the traveler a tale that is impossible yet, somehow, strangely feasible, and the "truths" unleashed from the man's lips send the traveler into a spiritual whirlwind. He is forced to question the very tenets of his beliefs, and it makes for a soul-jarring experience. The old man's message is that God is the penultimate Bad Guy, a jealous, neglectful Father responsible for all the woes of mankind. This revelation is couched in the sacred writings of the Bible itself, which makes it all the more telling on the traveler's heart and soul. In terms of the book as literature, it is a great success; it turns the kind of moralistic writing Nathaniel Hawthorne (as one example) excelled at completely on its head, proving very effective indeed. Emotions run high throughout the two men's extended conversation, and we see into their hearts and minds in really quite provocative ways.

What makes In Lieu of Heaven such an extraordinary novel to me, though, is the fact that Kevin Archer is actually a former Christian missionary. As such, his knowledge of the Bible is impressive and lends extra strength to his arguments. From my perspective as a conservative Southern Baptist, there is a definite shock value associated with reading this novel. I think this is just what the author intended, however, and that in itself is a further sign of the impressive literary character of the story. Obviously, I do not agree with Archer's condemnation of God as the ultimate bad guy in human history, but my disagreement on this point should not (and hopefully does not) color my review of the novel. If everyone already agreed with the author's own conclusions, he would never have written such a provocative novel in the first place. My own familiarity with the Bible actually makes Archer's argument all the more impressive; I can see just how knowledgeable he is and can pick up on the almost relentless references he makes to Biblical passages. Each such reference is actually footnoted as well, so interested readers can go to the Bible passages themselves, if so inclined, while reading the novel.

One can read almost anything into the Bible, as human history has shown. I admire the fact that Archer has documented all of his references; this tells me he is not forcing his own interpretation upon the reader, although he is obviously sincere in his condemnation of God. Just as he rebelled from the strict Christian upbringing of his youth, I do not think Archer would expect any reader to merely take his word for everything he says. "Question everything" is one of many messages I take from this novel. I think the author wants readers to examine the relevant Biblical passages and themes alongside the interpretation he is offering here; only then should the reader come to a conclusion of his own. However you look at it, the emotions Archer evokes from his two main characters definitely make for an emotionally strong challenge to orthodoxy.

I would recommend this novel to Christians and non-Christians alike. Living in such a chaotic world, it is healthy for the soul and healthy for one's peace of mind to search for eternal truths about man's purpose, both individually and collectively. Clearly, though, the author and I are sitting on opposite sides of the playing field. I would hope that non-believers would be exposed to the Bible through this novel and go to that ultimate source before making any spiritual decisions inspired by the reading experience. As for Christians, I have always believed that we should challenge our beliefs if we are to grow stronger in our faith, and In Lieu of Heaven does make for a formidable challenge.

This is a delightful work of metaphorical escape that should be a wonderful read for anyone with an unhappily repressive or narrow religious upbringing. The author does not fail to discuss tough issues, nor does he shy away from controversy. It is serious and witty both in a way that grows on you. Somehow it reminded me of Mount Analogue or of (Boyd's) Last Starship from Earth. A very Good Read!

In Lieu of Heaven is a remarkable deconstruction of a worldview so often taken for granted. With frequent biblical citations, author Kevin Archer meticulously illustrates the abusive nature of the Judeo-Christian god. His use of fiction to communicate this argument draws the reader in, following the protagonist through a world-shaking journey of discovery. Archer operates on the assumption that the Bible is literal truth written by God, deftly arguing not against belief in this god but against the worship of him. Creative, thoughtful, thought-provoking, and well-written, this ultimately inspiring book is highly recommended for open-minded believers and non-believers alike.

Kevin Archer's first-person allegory of disenchantment with his spiritual journey is an ultimately enjoyable tale, drawing in the reader with smooth prose and accessible protagonists. Interest is sustained by thought-filled examinations of biblical precepts all of which are artfully couched in an entertaining fictionalization of what might be called an atheist's apologetics.

A lone drifter, wandering a parched desert, happens upon an oasis occupied by a single inhabitant we soon discover is no other than the original Adam. The ensuing conversations between Adam and our drifter become a veritable deconstruction of biblical teaching, Adam insisting all the while that our drifter's quest to encounter God will never be met, since God is dead. Adam knows; he claims to be the one who killed Him, committing the murder as revenge for His having allowed Eve to die.

Exactly why Adam never died is not made clear, but the crux of the tale - aside from pointing out many of the ironies and hypocrisies of biblical teaching - centers around our waiting to have Adam explain precisely how it was he murdered God.

Enter the book's main flaw, stage left.

Archer's dénouement involves Adam and Judas being one, a resolution that had a difficult time gelling in my brain. Perhaps if Archer's Adam had conspired with Judas and claimed complicity in the death of Jesus I might have found In Lieu of Heaven slightly more cohesive. Of course, reading any manner of speculative fiction requires that the reader applies a hefty dose of what in drama has been dubbed "suspended disbelief." This doesn't mean, however, once the speculative fiction author has established the parameters of her "universe," that she can change them at any turn -- or toss them wholesale out the window -- without losing the reader's acceptance of said universe.

The other problem is, of course, that we all know Jesus died, but His death has never been equated with the death of the triune God. In Archer's work, the concept of the Trinity is not first deconstructed, as is so much else in biblical teaching, and therefore to accept the death of Jesus as equivalent to the annihilation of God requires a leap of, shall we say, faithlessness, that Archer has not wholly prepared us to accept.
He has, however, set us up to accept much, and has done it well. As a former missionary, his knowledge of the bible would seem fairly thorough, and he footnotes his references (citing chapter and verse) for the reader's convenience.

I first selected In Lieu of Heaven because I mistakenly thought it was going to be a scholarly approach to biblical deconstruction; I didn't realize I had ordered a novel. But if anything, In Lieu of Heaven was better than I anticipated precisely because it was a work of fiction. I say this because, in fictionalizing his thoughts, Archer's appeal becomes accessible on multiple levels and his intellectual acuity proven the keener for his approach. And yet by no means is to characterize In Lieu of Heaven as a scholarly work off the mark. Archer knows his subject well and evokes in the reader frequent and introspective thought-provoking pauses. I suspect this was one of his goals and he achieves it almost poetically.

In Lieu of Heaven is a brief 155 pages that will give readers more than 155 pages worth of impact, at least for those valuing well-written prose packing a punch that teeters on profundity. Over all well done. Earns three out of five possible stars.

The wanderer is on a journey and manages to stumble across the greatest conspiracy in the entire history of human culture.
Where do you go when everything you know is wrong?
Well...there seems to be a reasonable answer.

Great read, stimulating, provocative!