Most Helpful Customer Reviews
49 of 53 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
I read this book so you won't have to, June 25, 2004
Whilst this book did not make me physically ill, it has come closer than anything I have ever read. Firstly, the book is interminably long- 890 of the 1050 pages are devoted to the years up to 1963, effectively dealing with the first ten years of Sellers' significant work. The years from 1963 to 1980 (from marriage to Britt Ekland) are rushed through on the excuse that Sellers was basically repeating himself. I suspect that the real reason is that the long suffering publishers balked at the prospect of a further 1,000 pages. The most infuriating thing is that having laboured through the author's endless deviations and detours (is anyone interested in 4 pages on Lewis' views of the non-Sellers Kubrick films), he explains finally that the style was deliberately artful, and that he had inserted a fallible narrator into the text. Whilst this may be a thrilling joke for anyone reading for a degree in English, it is too glib and does not excuse Lewis' appalling writing style. Not since Will Self has an author so delighted in obscure words; the book is padded with endless footnotes and agents' letters (most of which are simply source material and not interested other than to an entertainment lawyer. Lewis' insertion of his own opinions and 'goonish' sense of humour grates more than I can describe. Lewis's essential point is that Sellers was a mother-loving monster who was dreadful to his family and anyone he worked with. Repetition adds little, and the organisation of the book is so chaotic that I began to feel as if I had read the plot of 'Being There' over ten times by the end of this book. Sheer bloody mindedness got me through this mess of a book. How it ever came to be published is beyond me. It is a testament to the arrogance of the author and the feebleness of the editor (was there one?) to control this beast.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
30 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
I certainly hope the film of this book isn't as horrid, May 5, 2004
By A Customer
Thankfully, I borrowed this garbage from the library and didn't purchase it. The problem with this book is that the writer makes outrageous claims based on anecdotal evidence. He claims that because Peter Sellers enjoyed "Harold and Maude" he had an incestuous fantasy about his mother. He waits until the end of the book and asks, "Was he a homosexual?". Then, he doesn't answer this question at all. He just picks up on a common theme in the films Peter was in. (Well, was he homosexual or incestuous towards his mother?) But THIS is the real key to why this book is meaningless.... The author quotes Peter Sellers from an interview he did AFTER HE DIED through a medium. Twice. He makes the argument that Peter was insane, and certainly SOME of his behaviour was strange, but he fails in his attempts. The author has the audacity to second-guess Kubrick's (wise) decision to remove the original ending of Dr. Strangelove. And he further illustrates his lack of insight concerning Being There. Peter commented how Chance's life is almost like Heaven. The author concludes that anyone who has an ounce of sanity would think Chance's life hell. Obviously, this man has no concept of Buddhism. All in all, avoid this book at all costs. I recommend Ed Sikov's "Mr. Strangelove" instead. Oh, and keep in mind that the photograph of Peter in a hospital in this book has since been established as a fraud.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
26 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Determinedly negative, October 5, 2001
There are interesting points and anecdotes related in this overly-long biography, but Lewis seems unable to distinguish between detail and repetition. I have read other biographies of Peter Sellers - whichever way you look at him a fascinating man. How this bio differs in the greatest way from others is that the author seems to be absolutely determined to interpret everything Peter Sellers did or said, and everything anyone else says about him, in a negative way. I'm sure, as with any complex and highly gifted person, Sellers had his "issues".....and fame, as it seems to, certainly developed serious problems. But no balance between the good and bad seems to be drawn here. Lewis focuses almost solely on the negative and seems to have selected his material with the aim of portraying only the worst of Sellers, particularly regarding his personal character and relationships. Lewis virtually ignores any good times - and there were many, if Graham Stark's "Remembering Peter Sellers" (highly recommended) is reliable - and good and lasting friendships, instead focusing on, it would seem, every dispute and source of conflict that ever arose in his life. Overall this book succeeds only in giving a strongly negative slant to someone at least deserving respect.One has to ask: was the author's main aim here to actually portray "the real Peter Sellers" or to dishonour his memory? If you look at the people who loved this man...those who he hurt but who still liked him...those who disliked him but ultimately respected him....if you look at what they have said about Sellers (without it being set in a biased context which makes even praise sound negative) you will find a truer version of the man than this book shows. What Herbert Kretzmer said about him in Peter Evans' "The Mask Behind the Mask", which is echoed by his first wife in "Sellers on Sellers", says a lot to me about his nature: "The great thing about Peter was that he was a loveable man. You loved him despite everything, you loved him in many ways because of his almost tragic shortcomings. "To be a friend of Peter Sellers you had to be a very sophisticated man, because you had to understand why he did the things he did. Perhaps it didn't make him any more endearing, but the man was singularly free of malice in the ordinary sense; it was simply that he so easily forgot too many of yesterday's promises and yesterday's passions." Lewis obviously lacks both the sophistication and insight to understand anything about Sellers as a man positively.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|