8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent, But Covers Too much Ground, June 12, 2000
This book is all over the map. At its best the book covers the intellectual and moral distance from Twain's boyhood in Hannibal (where slavery was accepted as "natural") to his Elmira, Connecticut evolution, where, as a kind of Southern expatriate (and son-in-law of a fervent abolitionist living in an important Underground railway stop), he challenged himself and the nation to fight racial inequality. At its worst, the book is a somewhat self-important narrative of the author's journey from researcher to advocate. In toto, it is well worth reading.
Dr. Fishkin, editor of Oxford's complete works of Mark Twain, wrote the earlier "Was Huck Black? Mark Twain and African-American voices" in which she argues that the "voice" of Huck Finn is drawn directly from the "rich creative oral tradition" of slaves and ex-slaves whom Twain met. Here she revisits Hannibal, the town that practiced "mild domestic slavery," though Twain's own father sold a slave "down the river" (and away from his family) for $40 worth of tar. Perhaps not coincidentally this is how much the eventually tar-feathered king and duke received for selling Jim. Racism is still evident in Hannibal, where the "erasure" of any black history mirrors the nationwide removal of "Huckleberry Finn" from school libraries. Fishkin argues convincingly that Twain's use of humor and irony serves, from Elmira onward, to expose, ridicule, and directly confront the enduring injustices of the Reconstruction years. Indeed, the controversial ending of `Finn,' in which an already-freed Jim is locked up and subjected to terrors by Tom and Huck, is interpreted by Fishkin and others as an accurate comment on the mirage of freedom offered to ex-slaves during Reconstruction.
This covers the first 126 pages of the book, and aside from some rather self-important comment on a five-year-old's hitting her with a miniature bullwhip, "I had just been bullwhipped on the banks of the Mississippi," it is a sobering and fascinating account of the racial whitewashing of Hannibal and America.
The next 77 pages contain some redundant, wide-eyed commentary on the omnipresence of Twain in American culture, both low and high (Chapter 3), and, in the epilogue, unnecessary innocent-by-association defenses of Twain. Both sections could have been pruned and achieved the same effect. Chapter 3 is amusing; it seems that Twain's image has been appropriated by entrepreneurs, playwrights and others to sell everything from imported ale to dry-cleaning to TV scripts. Many of Twain's famous quotes (e.g., "Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it," and "The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco") are either undocumented or came from someone else. But these examples, while suggesting that Twain functions the "consummate Rorschach test" of one's beliefs about America, are piled atop each other to include digressions such as which is the best movie adaptation of Twain's work; a long catalogue of books and other media that are either about Twain, "borrow" from his works (including her 11-year-old's "A Return to Camelot"), or that feature a fictionalized Twain; a comparison of both Fishkin's laptop computer and an IBM voice recognition machine to Twain's interest in an automatic typesetting machine. (The IBM machine, Fishkin dutifully reports, interpreted Twain's "rotten glad" as "writing glad," and "anybody but lied" as "any body butterfly.")
The "epilogue" also takes too long; Dr. Fishkin vigorously but somewhat condescendingly defends "Huckleberry Finn" from Jane Smiley's 1992 critique in "Harper's." Fishkin questions whether Smiley's could comprehend writer Ralph Wiley's deep valuation of Twain: "How could understanding Mark Twain's works be essential to any child in twenty-first century America....Smiley would shake her head. Not a clue." Dr. Fishkin also parades an all-star gallery of authors who defend Twain, and comment on his influence on their writing. She quotes a "silver-haired Oxford don" who sputtered, "This is going to sound very negative, but I can't figure out what you Americans see in this book," and later speculates, somewhat smugly, that the "don would have agreed, most likely" with an 1870 British publication describing Twain as a "very offensive specimen of the vulgarest kind of Yankee."
This is still an excellent book, despite its need for some editorial restraint, and its meandering trip through Twain's influence on culture. Because the book has so much to offer its few faults are all the more annoying. Perhaps Dr. Fishkin is preaching to the unconverted: Those who think Twain's masterpiece is a racist tract that should be abolished from schools and libraries. Despite the few flaws towards the end of the book, it is a fascinating account of a man's--and a nation's--challenging journey towards its ideals.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
First-rate meditation on Twain and scholarship., April 22, 2002
Shelley Fisher Fishkin clearly loves her work. She loves Mark Twain and she loves being able to write about him and teach about him. This book, written in an invitingly direct and personal style free of jargon, is best read as a voyage into the life and thought of a fine and creative scholar fully engaged with her chosen subject.
The book is arranged into three chapters. The first, "The Matter of Hannibal," ably juxtaposes Fishkin's experience of a visit to Hannibal, MO, and her reflections on that visit with her investigation of the role of Hannibal, MO, and Twain's youthful experiences on his classic novels THE ADVENTURES OF TOM SAWYER and THE ADVENTURES OF HUCKLEBERRY FINN. The second, EXCAVATIONS, is a quasi-autobiographical account of her research and writing of her most famous book (WAS HUCK BLACK? MARK TWAIN AND AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOICES), blended with her reflections on the controversy surrounding HUCKLEBERRY FINN as an allegedly racist book. The last chapter, RIPPLES AND REVERBERATIONS, is a blend of historical literary criticism and meditations on the uses to which Americans and others have put Mark Twain the writer, "Mark Twain" the self-created character, and Mark Twain the human being.
LIGHTING OUT FOR THE TERRITORY is a lovely book; it's a dream to read, and it's thought-provoking in the best sense. It's a model of how literary critics should write both for one another and for a wider audience, and it's an eye-opening examination of one of the greatest writers this country -- or the human race -- ever produced.
-- R.B. Bernstein, Adjunct Professor of Law, New York Law School
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
intelligent and well written, April 11, 2009
I find the book very refreshing on a number of counts. First, it demonstrates the ways in which the actual history of Blacks and Whites in American has often been misrepresented not only by fake historical re-creations such as the ones the author encountered in Hanibal, but by school texts, historical markers, and museum exhibits as well. Balanced and fair-minded, she also points out the struggles of people like the mayor of Hanibal to correct those distortions. Second, she helps to put to rest the often repeated charge that Huckleberry Finn is a racist novel by putting it in the context of Twain's other writings. Because the book is not only informative, but interesting and easy to read,I will recommend this book to my students. I am very glad our library has it. Every college library should.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No