Lindbergh Case and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
  • List Price: $24.95
  • Save: $2.49 (10%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 5 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by
Gift-wrap available.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by giggil
Condition: Used: Good
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Lindbergh Case Paperback – September 1, 1994

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
$19.13 $0.01

Frequently Bought Together

Lindbergh Case + The Ghosts of Hopewell: Setting the Record Straight in the Lindbergh Case + The Sixteenth Rail: The Evidence, the Scientist, and the Lindbergh Kidnapping
Price for all three: $45.26

Buy the selected items together

Best Books of the Year
Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 504 pages
  • Publisher: Rutgers University Press; 0003- edition (September 1, 1994)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0813521475
  • ISBN-13: 978-0813521473
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 1 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (23 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #726,202 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Fisher, a former FBI agent, teaches criminal justice at Edinboro University in Pennsylvania. Refuting those who claim that Bruno Richard Hauptmann was framed, the author presents a convincing case that he was guilty of the kidnap-murder of 20-month-old Charles A. Lindbergh Jr. In this well-documented study Fisher thoroughly covers the case, from the night the baby was taken from his home in Hopewell, N.J., on March 1, 1932, to Hauptmann's execution on April 3, 1936. The author vivifies the people involved: the child's parents; eccentric Dr. Condon who paid the ransom to "Cemetery John"; the competing investigators; the charlatans who offered to ransom the baby for huge sums; etc. Although Fisher notes that the police made mistakes and that Hauptmann's defense was incompetent, he argues that evidence of the accused's guilt is overwhelming. Photos.
Copyright 1987 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

That's why I feel the book is a very good one -- the best I'm aware of by far.
Clark Matthews
Fisher gives you a detailed, accurate and articulate history and makes it read like a crime novel.
jason collins
Mr. Fisher reveals taht Hauptman was a criminal who left Germany facing jail time.
General Phil Sheridan

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

23 of 28 people found the following review helpful By jim crawford on September 13, 2003
Format: Paperback
No matter what else one may think about this work, Fisher's book deserves to be read, if for no other reason than that it presents a thorough survey of the ''official evidence'' in the police files. Right at the beginning, he says that he believes Hauptmann to have been guilty, but then throughout the course of the book presents facts, among reams of other evidence, which indicate the distinct possibility that Hauptmann was innocent ---reasonable doubt at the very least. And, rather mysteriously in my view, he leaves out and/ or ignores crucial evidence from previously published authors like Anthony Scaduto and Ludovic Kennedy.
Boards in the Hauptmann attic, for example, which the government claimed were material from which the kidnappers' ladder was made, were disputed as legitimate evidence by defense experts, experts who never testified because Hauptmann's chief lawyer didn't bother to have them do so, quite possibly because of a continuous and severe lack of money with which to conduct investigations and cover witnesses' expenses.
Then again, defense fees were being largely covered by William Randolph Hearst, a fact which, given Hearst's record of suspiciously motivated involvement in other noteworthy national situations, should make any observer immediately cautious because it raises the distinct possibility of Hearst having been interested only in the publicity value of the case rather than in matters of guilt or innocence.
Further, Fisher ignores the dirty tricks alleged to have been undertaken by the prosecution and denigrates NJ Governor Harold Hoffman's attempts to save Hauptmann from death by having him admit his guilt.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
15 of 19 people found the following review helpful By Richard T Cahill Jr. on December 2, 2004
Format: Paperback
Jim Fisher's book is an excellent achievement. He brought forth many facts and pieces of evidence which had never previously been disclosed. He has done a great service to Lindbergh researchers everywhere.

However, his exuberance and desire to prove Hauptmann guilty have resulted in several problems. First, he creates dialogue based on letters and documents contained within the archives. However, the substance of the dialogue creates false impressions. For example, there is a fictitious conversation during which Hauptmann suggests that he would enter a plea bargain if different police authorities handled the case. Th actual letter merely states that Hauptmann once asked if he could ever expect leniency. The differences between the facts and the created dialogue are striking and significant.

Additionally, Fisher relies upon the word of a former archivist as a citation in support of several claims, such as the folding of a $20.00 gold certificate found on Hauptmann's person when he was arrested. The official documents do not support the previous archivist's assertions.

In conclusion, while Fisher's book offers remarkable evidence and demonstrates significant time and effort in research, there are certain factual errors and created dialogue which take a great deal away from this book. I do recommend it though.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful By Russell A. Rohde MD on October 23, 2007
Format: Paperback
"The Lindbergh Case", Jim Fisher, Rutgers Univ. Press, NJ, 1987 ISBN: 0-8135-1233-6, HC 430 pages plus 30 pages of Notes, Sources & Index plus 22 B & W photographs. 10 1/4" x 7 1/4".

Jim Fisher, lawyer, previous FBI agent and teacher of Criminal Justice, has chronicaled, rather tersely, the A to Z of the Lindbergh case using records not previously released until 1981, the NJSP records and the Hoffman papers, etc.

The author's writing style blends factual or verbatim quotations with a thoughtfully reconstructured conversational dialogue that admittedly departs from the purest journalism, but garners acceptance by utilizing adequate notes, etc. to effect a pleasant conversational style prose that makes reading almost effortless and ought not alter veridicality.

A lot of "loose ends" are tied or concluded, and many factoids are included so that much detail prevails that appeared lacking in previous books I've read on this case, some of them via Notes but others spelled out in great details, i.e. the details and results of the jury's many votings, the verdicts and setting & re-setting of execution dates, last minute appeals, etc. However, in the end, the reader like the author will find the evidence given to the jurors is compelling beyond a reasonable doubt. It is a long book and the print is small, but the intent, the evidence, and its presentation provides a cerebrally ambitious journey for the reader.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
15 of 20 people found the following review helpful By Clark Matthews on May 9, 2001
Format: Paperback
Author Jim Fisher is a criminology professor at Rutgers University in New Jersey, and is a former FBI agent. He has produced what I think is the most thorough and comprehensive overview of all aspects of the Lindbergh case record. The result is a readable (not sensational) chronicle of virtually all the facets and personalities of this complex and still-baffling case.
"The Lindbergh Case" covers every aspect of the sensational 1932 kidnap/murder case and its aftermath, drawing extensively from public and non-public sources. I thought that Fisher evenhandedly examined all credible evidence remaining in the records. He says up front, however, that his conclusion is that Hauptman acted alone, planning the kidnap and cold-bloodedly killing Lindbergh's infant son for the ransom money.
I appreciated Fisher's candor. But just as much, any thoughtful reader will appreciate Fisher's inclusion of much evidence that flatly contradicts his conclusion, or at least points to reasonable doubts about Hauptman's sole guilt.
Fisher's evenhanded and thorough approach destroys today's most scurillous theory about the Lindbergh baby's death -- that Charles Lindbergh killed the baby himself. If the idea was ever seriously credible, the weight of the evidence for Hauptman and other conspirator(s) snatching the baby is overwhelming ... in fact, Fisher dutifully includes the account of a Jersey State trooper, who saw 2 sets of footprints leading away from the house in the mud before the yard was trampled. As I say, Mr. Fisher is thorough and honest in his reporting -- he concludes Hauptmann acted alone but includes ample data that render his conclusion inexplicable, or at least questionable.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?