9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Fun, but flawed, February 27, 2001
If you spend time on UFO sites on the Web or if you read books positing iconoclastic hypotheses about ancient civilizations by authors such as Graham Hancock, Zacharia Sitchen, Erich von Daniken and others of that ilk, then this is the novel for you. If you are a stickler about the science in science fiction being accurate, then this book will probably offend your sensibilities, since whatever Walt Becker studied at UCLA and USC, it clearly was not anatomy or physics. The most glaring knee-slapper in the book is where the hero slashes the "aorta" of one of the baddies, which, curiously, is located in his throat (your aorta and mine are located in our chests, as in directly connected to our hearts). The discussion of thermodynamics and nukes is likewise clearly uninformed, which is a distracting flaw in an author who appears to aspire to Michael Crichton's mantle by the mixing of science and fiction.
The problem is, as noted in many of the other reader reviews, much of the science is dead wrong and much of what is passed off as science is the sort of New Age babble on which many authors make a good living. And some of the good science is misrepresented, following the lead of the New Age babble authors referenced above.
Having said all of that, the novel is not as bad as the worst reviews on here would lead you to believe. Sure, the characters are one-dimensional. Sure, the action is basically Indiana Jones meets Michael Crichton meets Erich von Daniken. And, sure, Becker could have used a few more characters on the good guy team so that the Sancho Panza-like scientist sidekick of his protagonist did not have to be a polymath (this guy was so expert in so many different disciplines at the age of 30, he must not have had time to sleep).
But, hey, it was still interesting and entertaining for what it was: a flawed first novel by a guy who hopes to get rich the way Crichton did. I read it and enjoyed it even though bothered by the superficial writing, shallow characters and predictable action. The ideas were interestingly presented and were a familiar echo of the X-files. It is not great literature and would be an inexcusable fifth novel, but, hey, this guy not only got published but got reprinted in paperback. Do I wish he'd written a better book to support his theme of alien "improvement" of humankind? Sure, but it's still entertaining.
One final note: many of the criticisms leveled at this book could be made with equal force as to Crichton, Tom Clancy and John Grisham, just to name a few. Anyone who read Airframe or any of Clancy's or Grisham's later novels knows what I'm talking about. These guys also broke faith with their fans by offering up shallow characters, predictable, formulaic rehashes of well-worn plots and unlikely premises. Why? For the same reason Becker did: to make money.
I recommended this book to others and still do. It's fun, which is more than I can say for some of the recent offerings from those established, prosperous authors. To those who were vituperative in their reviews, I say, "Lighten up!"
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Don't bother, April 16, 2001
A friend of mine recommended this book because she wanted my opinion on the science. What science? This author has no respect for the actual science he purports to have researched (for a whole 18 months, no less!).
The paleoanthropological search of humanity's origins is actually such as fascinating story, but you won't find it here. With fiction allegedly based on science there's no excuse for the basic science to be dead wrong--especially with this author's afterword. Carbon dating volcanic flows? Civilizations springing up from nothing? I recommend Becker take a few basic archaeology and/or anthropology classes--or read some of the basic literature--before he tries again with this topic.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The most awful adventure novel I have ever had the misfortune to buy, July 22, 2007
When I picked up the book and saw that the action took place in Mali and dealt with paleoanthropology, I just had to have it. To my disappointment, the chapters about Mali are so frought with mistakes(e. g. the Dogon are not a warrior society but peaceful farmers. They don't hop up and down like Massai. The Songhai don't live close to the Dogon but in the North of Mali. Mali is not in Central but in West Africa. Etc. etc.) Add to that the gratuitous violence and hairbrained action about the anthropologists being armed with machine guns and having South African guards. I spent four years in Mali as a Peace Corps volunteer and can guarantee that the author never set foot there or even did careful research. An awful book I don't recommend to anyone.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No