Update May 24, 2012:
###############
Netgear is about to release the
R6300 based on the 802.11ac VHT spec which promises Gigabit wireless speeds, making wireless HD video streaming a reality. (See the comments section for a tutorial on the 802.11n specification and all this Nxxx business.)
What does this mean to someone looking for a new router?
It means that the phrase "top of the line router" just got redefined, and the answer of which router to choose just got a bit more complicated.
However, I'd still recommend the WNDR4500 because (a) the 802.11ac spec isn't yet final; (b) there aren't any adapters that can take advantage of all that extra bandwidth (remember the cost of high bandwidth is not just at the router - you have to spend big bucks at each device's adapter to get maximum benefits); and most importantly (c) unless you are an early adopter whose Pavlovian response just kicked in, do you really have the time/desire to be a beta tester for a brand new implementation? (Waiting for a few firmware updates to blow through tends to do wonders for one's sanity).
Original Review:
###########
I recently had a chance to compare the
Netgear WNDR4500 and the Cisco EA4500 - both top of the line consumer grade routers that are brimming over with the latest features.
Since there is very little difference in their feature sets, I am going to try and answer a more important question:
Which router is the better choice as the centerpiece of a home network?
In a nutshell: The WNDR4500 was the clear winner for me - at the farthest usage point from my router, through multiple walls and floors, it not only provided a stronger signal, but also provided twice the throughput as the EA4500.
Test setup:
########
(1) I used inSSIDer to measure signal strength at my receiver, and iPerf to measure the network's throughput.
(2) To focus purely on the router's throughput, I hardwired the server host to my router, and turned off all other network hosts except my test wireless client.
(3) I tested in the 2.4 GHz band because (a) it is the most relevant band in our home, and (b) it is the most challenging for any router
(4) I took measurements at 3 locations - right next to my router, at the farthest point (my fitness area), and at a mid point (my entertainment center).
Note that for throughput measurements, I did not use speedtest.net - as measurements can be skewed by factors outside of the router's control (such as a congested neighborhood backbone). Similarly, I did not perform file copying - as this can be skewed by NAS/drive performance.
Test Results:
#########
The two measures of interest are:
(1) the throughput - i.e. how many bits can this router actively pump through our network, measured here in Mbps (millions of bits per second).
The higher the throughput, the better your network experience, especially while streaming video content.
For the near, farther, and farthest positions:
-- the Cisco AE4500 delivered throughput rates in Mbps of 36.5/20.9/9.5
-- the WNDR4500 delivered throughput rates in Mbps of 27.2/24.4/20.1
(2) the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) which is a measure of the signal strength at the receiver.
The higher the RSSI, the stronger your signal, and so the better the chance that you will be able to receive content from your router. Remember that these are negative numbers, so -58 is actually a stronger signal than -65.
For the near, farther, and farthest positions:
-- the Cisco AE4500 delivered RSSIs of -48/-58/-65 respectively.
-- the WNDR4500 delivered RSSIs of -46/-53/-58 respectively.
In my tests, the WNDR4500 provided nearly constant throughput across the extent of our home (24 Mbps average), and its strong RSSI showing even at the farthest point in our home, was instrumental in subduing our neighbor's rather aggressive router.
Other Thoughts:
###########
1. You can't go wrong with either router when it comes to features.
In addition to the fastest rating - 450 Mbps on both the 2.4GHz and 5 GHz bands, you get DHCP Address Reservation, a Stateful Packet Inspection firewall, Dynamic DNS configuration, Guest networks, Port forwarding and triggering (AE4500's interface is better), QoS configuration, etc.
2. The vertical form factor of the WNDR4500 takes up very little desk space.
3. While the web interfaces of both routers are usable, the WNDR4500's is slightly better because of how it segregates Basic and Advanced functionality.
4. The WNDR4500 not only supports guest networks on both bands (2.4 and 5GHz), but also provides awesome control over what a guest device can do. E.g., you can limit it to only accessing the Internet. The AE4500 does not allow such control and only supports a single guest network on the 2.4GHz band.
5. The EA4500 hosts one USB port, whereas the WNDR4500 supports two.
6. The EA4500 can act as a FTP server (I didn't try this out) - but the WNDR4500 cannot.
7. The WNDR4500 can be configured for use as a wireless repeater, allowing a wireless signal's range to be extended.
8. I did not use the bundled software. See the comments for easy steps to set up a router without installing another piece of software.
9. The WNDR lights up like a Christmas tree, giving a nice sense of well-being. The AE4500 is more staid with a single glowing logo.
Conclusion:
########
More than anything else, the key characteristics of a router are:
(a) its ability to maintain high throughput over its coverage area,
(b) the ability to maintain a solid stable connection with its clients
(c) the ease with which it can be configured, and
(d) solid security options (see my first comment for tips here).
On all four counts, the WNDR4500 comes up aces.
I'd caution against the following marketing features, which I personally do not use (of course, YMMV):
1) USB printing - quite an anachronism with most printers being wireless.
2) Heavy client applications like Netgear's Genie or Cisco's Connect are unnecessary. I'd rather they focused on making the web interface more user friendly, as Netgear is doing.
3) Configuring a router over a phone might possibly be the most inane feature invented. Yes, I'm talking about you, Cisco Connect Cloud.
4) USB drive support is usually neither as performant as a dedicated NAS solution; nor is the remote access web interface as simple as using a cloud client such as Dropbox. However, the convenience it presents may argue in its favor.
Final Word:
########
If you are considering the WNDR4500, I would also point you at my review of the
Netgear N600 Wireless Dual Band Gigabit Router - Premium Edition (WNDR3800) - which brings features such as Clear Channel to the party, but at the cost of speed. The WNDR3800 is a very capable router and should be on your list of routers to consider.
Happy Networking!
~Damodar