9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Many errors... beware, but may be useful., August 4, 2005
I am an instructor in pediatric nursing in an RN program, and I reviewed this book and found dozens of typographical, editorial, and content errors, which were submitted to the publisher. The content errors were few, but the other mistakes in editing show that this book was put together rather poorly and hurriedly. I would NOT recommend reading this in place of class notes or textbook. Doing so will be career suicide. Helpful for those studying for the CPN exam or a final exam for class, but only if you identify the content errors in the book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
BUY BUY BUY, June 8, 2000
This book got me an A in peds! I followed this book in class and never opened my textbook! There are several more in the series and all are wonderful. Bravo, Lippincott. I keep the book for reference now.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Unforgivable errors for a medical book, December 17, 2009
Alison and Orestes were correct. The text had numerous errors in spelling which plainly show the need for a proofreader who knows medicine. The difference between "symptomatic" and "asymptomatic" is only one letter, but oh, what a difference in meaning! At least one condition is repeatedly misnamed (misspelled) throughout the text. The book is useful for review, but much more so when the reader has prior knowledge and can recognize these mistakes. Given that it's the fourth edition, I would have expected at least an insert of Errata. Given these problems, the book's worth three stars.
However, the accompanying CD, which contains reviews/tests, drags it down. To be fair to the author, this is probably the fault of the publishers.
The program appears to be Windows-95 vintage. That in itself is not a problem. But it simply does not work. If you want to do the review, answering the questions is supposed to give immediate feedback. If you want to take the test, it should provide a total score without the feedback. Unfortunately, it was impossible to find out. For either one, the user is presented with a starting menu: Do you want 10, 25, 50, or All questions, or do you want to specify a different number? The 10/25/50 choices were always grayed out. The All, when selected, immediately proceeded to a summary stating that 0 of 0 questions were answered correctly. The final choice, where the user is prompted for a specific number of questions to be asked, presents a true conundrum: if a positive number is entered, a message pops up: "The number of questions must be equal to or less than 0." If zero is entered, it states "The number of questions must be greater than zero." Taken in sum, these behaviors make the CD absolutely worthless: zero stars. The test cannot be used to confirm or deny the accuracy of the text or the knowledge of the user. The problem would be easily remedied, if I had access to the source code. I sent a query to tech support at the publisher, but have not received an answer, four days after sending it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No