This is an interesting book that will probably be very useful to its target audience: "...young people who are considering a life-long commitment to the progressive cause, and for anyone who is curious about how voters make political decisions and what is involved in organizing for change." However, it is also an odd book, to the point of being irritating.
Creamer has, in effect, produced a combination of two books. One is a how-to manual for progressive activists; the other is a rationale for progressive policies and a call to arms for those who favor those policies. Unfortunately, the combination doesn't work particularly well here. One would expect the rationale to come before the how-to manual, but for some unfathomable reason, Creamer does it the other way around. In addition, he really needs some editorial help; the copy design of the book is grotesque, with weird indentation patterns, combinations of bulleted and numbered lists, willy-nilly bold-facing, italics, and underlining-- and sometimes all three together-- and odd rhetorical jumps from chapter to chapter. Finally, the book is too long, at 600+ pages.
In short, this is a book you have to really want to read, or you just won't finish it. That may or may not be a bad thing, depending on your point of view.
Creamer is an unapologetic advocate for the progressive cause. (By the way, as he explains about 500 pages into the book, "progressive" means "liberal"; the "radical conservatives" have successfully made "liberal" a pejorative, so the liberals can't use that word any more.) He's spent his life as a political organizer, and he uses that experience to illustrate the points he's making with interesting anecdotes. The book is based on the a priori assumption that the progressive cause is true, pure, and right. If you can't accept that assumption, you will not like this book at all.
However, even though the progressive cause is true, pure, and right, the task of progressive organizers is to crush any candidates who run against that cause. That's because, obviously, if progressives aren't elected to office, the progressive agenda cannot be enacted into law and financed.
Fair enough, but Creamer clearly believes that those committed to the progressive cause are justified in using any and all means to "frame" the debate and win the election, while those who run against them are by definition radical conservatives who are not justified ipso facto in using any and all means necessary to win. If you cannot accept that point of view, you will not like this book at all.
I thought the book was interesting, but I really didn't like it at all. Its organization and lack of editorial discipline made it a very nearly unreadable mess. In addition, I am an independent, one of the misguided people Creamer is interested in training activists to motivate and manipulate during campaigns, so there really wasn't much here for me.
I'm afraid that the same will be true for anyone else who's not already one of the progressive activists that Creamer is directing the book toward.