Most Helpful Customer Reviews
43 of 45 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A Major Opportunity Lost, November 12, 2007
This review is from: "Live from Cape Canaveral": Covering the Space Race, from Sputnik to Today (Hardcover)
When I first heard about Jay Barbree's "Live from Cape Canaveral," I had high hopes for it. I expected it to be a memoir of one of radio and television's longest-serving and most-respected space reporters, a man who covered America's space program "live from Cape Canaveral" virtually since its inception. I looked forward to reading the "untold" story of the developing relationship between the space program and the media, back in the pre-cable, pre-satellite days of black-and-white television and rabbit-ear antennas. I eagerly anticipated gaining new insights into the astronauts and into other space reporters of the early days--men such as Walter Cronkite and Jules Bergman--based on Mr. Barbree's personal knowledge. I expected to read previously unpublished, behind-the-scenes revelations about the nation's space missions from someone who had "been there and done that" since day one.
Unfortunately, I was disappointed on all counts.
"Live from Cape Canaveral" is basically nothing more than an extremely superficial summary of American manned space missions. And I do mean superficial. The entire Skylab flight program, for example, gets literally one short paragraph, with absolutely no mention of the near-loss of the orbital workshop on launch, or the heroic and successful efforts of three astronaut crews to restore it to habitability. In "Live from Cape Canaveral," Mr. Barbree does not take advantage of his position, his longevity as a spaceflight journalist or his alleged "insider" knowledge to add anything to the literature of American spaceflight. He passed up a golden opportunity to contribute worthwhile new information to the historical record in favor of simply re-hashing the same stories that have been told countless times before. And, as other reviewers have correctly pointed out, there are many inexcusable technical and factual errors from someone who claims to be the "go-to guy" for spaceflight questions.
"Live from Cape Canaveral" never lives up to its intriguing premise. While it is well-written and fast-paced, it could have been so much more. If you're a serious space enthusiast, I recommend you give it a pass--there's nothing here you haven't read before.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
35 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
On the surface, exciting, enjoyable - but very misleading, December 31, 2007
This review is from: "Live from Cape Canaveral": Covering the Space Race, from Sputnik to Today (Hardcover)
This book initially appears to be a fun, enjoyable, exciting read - a romp through the golden age of spaceflight. For those who believe the back cover blurb, they might never be the wiser.
However, it's all misleading surface gloss.
There are some fundamental problems with this book. For example:
- Barbree was not there for many of the conversations he pretends to remember verbatim
- One of the photos is a known fake
- Many of the crucial and easily-checked facts are incorrect.
So, if you read this book, file under "fiction." Or, for a far more reliable and satisfying read, read the excellent For Spacious Skies: The Uncommon Journey of a Mercury Astronaut
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
40 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Book Should Be Recalled by the Publisher due to Faked Photo., November 28, 2007
This review is from: "Live from Cape Canaveral": Covering the Space Race, from Sputnik to Today (Hardcover)
I am extremely disappointed by the quality and accuracy of the writing in this book - but with some further research my feelings now go beyond that, in that I feel publishing may actually be counterproductive, perhaps even dangerous, to history.
There's an interesting and prominent story in the news this week by science writer Andrea Thompson, "Fake Photos Alter Real Memories," suggesting that digitally altered photos not only give false impressions to those who were not there for historical events, they can even alter perceptions and memories of history for those who were there.
So why does Barbree take the irresponsible step of using a realistic-looking, but faked photo of people on the surface of the moon, with no notation made in the book that it is a fake?
There are people out there actively looking for "evidence" that humans never went to the moon, that it was all a hoax, and trying to pick apart the real photos. Using faked photos is hardly going to help with this issue. In fact, it is likely to make it worse.
And this is aside from the many previously-discussed errors of fact in the writing that Barbree scatters throughout this badly-researched book.
Barbree used this fake photo before in the first edition of another of his books. Space experts noticed, and apparently the publisher pulled it from subsequent editions. Why Barbree would try and pull the same trick again is puzzling, having been caught once. Collins, the publishers, have a reputation to uphold, and if I were them I would recall this book before it does any more damage to history. There are well-intentioned Amazon reviews being posted here suggesting this book should be given to high schoolers, when, in fact, this kind of fakery and bad writing should probably not have been published, and certainly never used as part of any educational efforts.
The space program was exciting and vivid enough of a story without trying to pump up the excitement level by resorting to inaccurate anecdotes and fake photos.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|