Living Originalism and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Qty:1
  • List Price: $35.00
  • Save: $4.73 (14%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Living Originalism has been added to your Cart
Used: Like New | Details
Sold by RentU
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: Fast shipping from Amazon! Qualifies for Prime Shipping and FREE standard shipping for orders over $35. Overnight, 2 day and International shipping available! Excellent Customer Service.. May not include supplements such as CD, access code or DVD.
Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for $3.11
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Living Originalism Hardcover – December 29, 2011


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$30.27
$23.00 $14.05

Best Books of the Year
See the Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.


Frequently Bought Together

Living Originalism + We the People, Volume 1: Foundations (We the People (Harvard))
Price for both: $58.52

Buy the selected items together
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 480 pages
  • Publisher: Belknap Press (December 29, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0674061780
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674061781
  • Product Dimensions: 6.3 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #787,696 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

Living Originalism is the best book on constitutional theory I have ever read. It offers brilliant argument and insights and is often truly moving in its conception of what it means to take the Constitution seriously. It will be a worthy successor to Bickel's The Least Dangerous Branch and Ely's Democracy and Distrust in framing discussion of the Constitution for years to come. (Sanford Levinson, University of Texas School of Law)

Living Originalism is the best and most important work in constitutional theory since Dworkin's Law's Empire. Despite my deep disagreement with several of its key claims, it is without doubt a work of remarkable sophistication, maturity, and grace. Jack Balkin is already in the upper echelon of today's constitutional scholars, but this book puts him at the top of the top. (Randy Barnett, Georgetown University Law Center)

With this book Jack Balkin has produced what might be described as an owner's manual for the Constitution, revealing with painstaking care the many ways in which it can be read and interpreted. Balkin deftly shows how we can move past arguments over 'living' versus 'originalist' constitutionalism, to arrive at the welcome place where Americans can own and redeem the Constitution for themselves. (Dahlia Lithwick, Slate)

Jack Balkin is the lion among the legal scholars who understand that the original meaning of the Constitution is something that progressives can embrace just as readily as conservatives have. In Living Originalism, he shows why it is not enough to perform leaps of lexicographical legerdemain that have little to do with the real history of our founding document. Balkin boldly appeals to us to take both the text and principles of the original Constitution seriously. The Constitution has always been constructed, not simply interpreted, and Balkin wonderfully explains how this unavoidable process can be squared with its original meaning. (Jack Rakove, Stanford University)

It will rivet anyone who cares about the Constitution...Jack Balkin is one of the most insightful scholars working on constitutional issues today, and Living Originalism is a great read for any originalist who wants to stop and think every few pages. (Robert VerBruggen Washington Times 2012-02-13)

Living Originalism…succeeds in providing an endlessly engaging theory of constitutional law that wrestles with the field's most urgent concerns in a way that accounts for nuance without sacrificing clarity. That is no meager achievement. Balkin's book will likely serve as a focal point for constitutional theorists of various stripes for years to come. The volume's prominence seems assured because it presents in an unusually acute form the fundamental question of whether any variety of originalism can provide what liberals want--and, significantly, what liberals in future generations will want--in a theory of constitutional interpretation. (Justin Driver New Republic 2012-04-05)

American constitutional interpretation generally divides into two rival theories. The first, originalism, contends that the Constitution should be read in light of the intent or original meaning of its framers at the time it was constructed. The second, living constitutionalism, encourages judges to read the document in light of contemporary understandings and society. Both theories are controversial, have partisan adherents, and are deficient, according to Balkin, in that they fail to capture how the Constitution must be read within the context of American democracy and the broader role that not just the courts but also the other branches of government and citizens have in giving meaning to it. Balkin offers a powerful theory that clarifies originalism and living constitutionalism, constructing a theory of living originalism that brings the two together. Balkin articulates a theory about how constitutions have basic meanings that are particularly applied in and over time, showing how text, intent, and meaning can provide both a framework for democracy and a guide for how judges should approach specific issues such as equal protection. (D. Schultz Choice 2012-06-01)

About the Author

Jack M. Balkin is Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment and Director of the Information Society Project and the Knight Law and Media Program, all at Yale Law School.

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 12 people found the following review helpful By Greg Bassham on March 6, 2013
Format: Hardcover
This is a dazzling book, written with verve, eloquence, and remarkable erudition, which certainly belongs in the pantheon of leading works in American constitutional theory. As a progressive, I'd love to accept Balkin's thesis--roughly, that we have a Constitution that is every liberal's dream. Unfortunately, I'm not persuaded by the argument.

Balkin--like Akhil Amar, Larry Solum, and other heavyweight liberal legal theorists--wants to reconcile originalism with progressive living constitutionalism. It finally dawned on liberals that old-fashioned living constitutionalism, which gives unelected judges the de facto power to update and amend the Constitution, doesn't play well in Peoria. So they decided to play lip service to original meaning while arguing for a broader theory of constitutional adjudication that supports Roe, Lawrence, and pretty much all liberal holdings of the past half century.

To do this, liberals like Balkin need to treat the "original meaning" of the constitution's vague, general, or abstract language as virtually empty shells into which they can pour whatever potent concoction they like. Key constitutional phrases such as "equal protection of the laws," "due process of law," "freedom of speech," "privileges or immunities," and "cruel or unusual punishments" are seen as expressing vague or abstract "standards" or "principles." As such, their meaning quickly "runs out." To apply the vague standards or abstract principles or to concretize them in legal doctrines, we need to engage in "construction," not "interpretation.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 14 people found the following review helpful By Paul Sleven <psleven@cybernex.net> on March 27, 2012
Format: Hardcover
This book presents a coherent and well-reasoned theory of constitutional law. It has deepened my understanding of how to think about the constitution and, in particular, the issues raised by originalism.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 9 people found the following review helpful By Mark bennett on September 11, 2012
Format: Hardcover
The author of this book sets out to swallow the constitutional principles of "originalism" into the ideas of "the living constitution". The book somewhat seems to realize without necessarly saying it that the doctrine of the "living constitution" (i.e. unlitmited interpretetation) went way too far. He tries to use "originalism" to find limits and structure for his living constitution. To create vague limits as to where interpretation can go and to re-claim the authority of the text itself for the advocates of the "living constitution".

The book is well argued. But the case it argues is rather flawed and (even worse) reactive. The author doesn't really have his heart in originalism. But he realizes the intellectual strength of the idea and seems to see the only way of saving his "living constitution" is somehow to come to terms with originalism. To compromise with it. To find some way of working his ideas into it or turning originalism around until it is his idea.

He wants to textually break the constitution up and see different sections as having different levels of literalness which require different degrees of respect for original intent. A reasonable sounding idea, but impossible in practice because the standard would be too subjective. The author somewhat admits this by effectively showing that he would have to give up nothing in terms of past court decisions. About all he admits is that the courts could not give states three senators or allow a 22 year old to be elected president.

The book goes after the contradiction between stare decisis (i.e. accepting previous precidents of the court) and originalism. That is probably one of the more unconvincing arguments in the book.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 9 people found the following review helpful By prg83 on November 30, 2013
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I got this book for an extra credit book report for my con law class. I never ended up reading it, or doing the report so it was a waste of $
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
24 of 68 people found the following review helpful By Eros Faust on November 28, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I get physically ill when I hear a "Living Constitutionalist" expound on the virtues of Originalism.

Don't get me wrong, Balkin is an expert, and the book is well-written. What's wrong with it is that "Living Constitutionalists" can't get over the fact that the end doesn't justify the means. They convince themselves that without destroying the Constitution, the civil rights movement, abortion rights movement, gay rights movement, and explosive centralization of governmental power in Washington would never have progressed as rapidly as they did. To victor, however, go the spoils.

Democracy is now dead in America. Everyone knows that Congress is dysfunctional and that the country is ruled by unelected administrative agencies. Social policy is now made through constitutional litigation in the courts, and the average citizen has no say in governing himself. He is a serf, a draft horse enslaved in a system he is powerless to change. We lament the fact that people don't vote, but we decline to admit that not voting is just good common sense. The "vote of the people" changes little for the better.

The liberals who presided over the demise of the American dream now feel guilty, and authors like Balkin try to apply balm to their wounds with statements like "Living Constitutionalism and Originalism are not incompatible." Unfortunately, they are.

If you read pages 318-319 you will see the basic premise, that amending the Constitution using the Article 5 amendment process has been replaced by amendments to the Constitution made by processes which are undemocratic, but efficient and quick. In other words, "government by the people and for the people" has vanished from the face of the country and government by the elite few who run administrative agencies or who bring constitutional litigation has replaced it.

It's not inaccurate. It's just sad.
9 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?