Qty:1
Lomography 603 35 mm 100/... has been added to your Cart

Other Sellers on Amazon
Add to Cart
$13.73
+ $1.30 shipping
Sold by: M Z Photo
Add to Cart
$9.90
+ $7.00 shipping
Sold by: Lomography US
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Lomography 603 35 mm 100/36 ISO Fine Color Negative Film - 3 Rolls in a Pack (Red)

4.2 out of 5 stars 33 customer reviews
| 4 answered questions

Price: $14.95 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
In Stock.
Sold by Kellards and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
  • Super-fine grain color negative.
  • Ultra-saturated with heavy blacks, cutting whites and insane colors.
  • High detail 100 ISO.
  • 24X36mm (35mm) 36 exposures
  • 24X36mm (35mm) 36 exposures.
5 new from $9.90
$14.95 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details In Stock. Sold by Kellards and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

  • Lomography 603 35 mm 100/36 ISO Fine Color Negative Film - 3 Rolls in a Pack (Red)
  • +
  • Lomography 35mm 36 Exposure 800 ISO film- 3 pack
  • +
  • Lomography 610 35 mm 100/36 ISO Black and White Earl Grey- 3 Pack (Black)
Total price: $44.75
Buy the selected items together

Technical Details


Product Description

Only the finest in analog emulsions for your ever-hungry Logographic camera. Process a roll of Loom Fine Color 35mm Film for unbelievable colors, huge contrast, small grain, and fine resolution. Each pack includes 3 rolls of 36-exposure Logographic Color Negative film - your VIP (very interesting photographer) ticket to flat-out-awesome results. Film works happily with all 35mm cameras, including the Fisheye, Fisheye 2, Helga 35mm and Action sampler. Get some analog love. Imported.

Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 4 x 4 x 2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 0.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B001DZ9E7G
  • Item model number: 603
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (33 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: June 17, 2003

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
I bought this film with the purpose of using it with a Diana Mini camera, a lot of people discouraged me of buying it because it's ISO 100 (slow type of film), but since I live in a place where is bright and sunny at least 300 days of the year I decided to give it a try. I was not dissapointed at all, the pictures had vivid colors and there where no grainy photos whatsoever!

I must highlight that this film is best suited for bright and sunny days where it works best, if your intention is to take shots at night without a tripod go with ISO 800 or higher, or if you pretend to take pictures indoors and outdoors use the ISO 400.
Comment 20 of 23 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Background: I am an amateur photographer (some paid gigs, but I don't make a living out of it) and wanted to do a more in depth review of this film. I shoot 35mm as a hobby and live in the bright sun of Arizona, so I wanted to see how this film worked primarily as an alternative to Kodak Gold 200, the other inexpensive film option. I do not actually shoot on Lomo cameras, and wanted to see how this would work in traditional 35mm SLR's and rangefinders. For this review I am testing the film with my Canon A1 and various lenses (20mm f2.8, 35mm f2, and 55mm f1.2) to see if it works as a general use film, and will update this review later using a Minolta Maxxum 7000 and Contax G1. Personally I do not have an interest in lots of grain, light leaks, or unpredictable results, and will be reviewing the film as it compares to other general use negative films.

Film overview: Lomography themselves do not actually make film. Instead, they rebrand other film types and sell them under their own brand. I have heard that these are usually expired films, which gives them their signature “look” (higher grain, color shifts, unpredictable exposures). The expiration date was labeled on the package as 1/2016. You can tell who the original manufacturer of the film is by checking the 6 digit serial number below the barcode. Mine was 114034, making it a repackage of the Italian film Solaris by Ferrania. That makes this film quite a value, as rolls of that type are normally $7 each, and this package gets you 3 rolls for $8. I will compare this lomo repackage to Ektar 100, Kodak Gold 200, and lastly samples of Solaris 100 that I have found on the web.

Film Performance for Prints:
For my developing and prints I use Costco. Great prices and generally good results.
Read more ›
2 Comments 9 of 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
I purchased a three-pack of this film mainly as a curiosity to see if it lived up to its "fine color" description. I shot several rolls with a Canon AE-1 (using the "program" setting as well as a few higher shutter speeds) and results for the most part were pretty nice.

As mentioned elsewhere, you'll need ample light to get the most of your shots. Outdoor shots in bright daylight yielded some great pictures though the degree of color saturation depends largely on what you're shooting. The richer the subject color the more distinct the images will tend to be I've noticed. Backyard shots of our dogs (2 black labs & a German shepherd) against a green yard looked great for example, whereas shots of our kids playing at the park didn't appear any more saturated than shots taken using regular garden-variety film.

For what it costs, it certainly doesn't hurt to try - good light and a color-rich subject will definitely make it worth the outlay.
Comment 10 of 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Hey guys, rather than complain and say, my pictures were crappy because of this crappy slow film, use a tripod. Great images aren't free. If you're shooting fast moving subjects, then you're using the wrong film for the job at hand.
Digital spoils us fast, I guess.
4 Comments 36 of 50 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I was expecting a better performance of this new film. in particular when I got the 100ASA but the excessive grain does not equal like the old brands. Color is very decent. Perhaps I am missing the old KODAK film.
3 Comments 2 of 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Definitely not the highest quality film. I mostly use this film for experimenting when I'm not willing to spend $8 on a roll of Kodak Ektar. Overall it gets the job done and is an ok quality.
Comment 2 of 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
I've shot a lot of 100 speed film over the years. I have a harder time getting sharp pics out of this film than others I've tried. The color pallete of this film is a little different than your typical Kodak or Fuji film, so if you want a little different look and feel to your pics, this film is a possibility, but I can't recommend it if you're wanting to get sharp/well-defined details. About the time I shot a couple rolls of this film, I shot a roll of expired Kodak 100 film and Agfa 100 slide film. I had much better results with the Kodak and Agfa than I had with fresh Lomo 100.

I also have shot the 120 format Lomo 100, and I have to say that I like that one more than the 35mm version. And I have tried the 35mm Lomo 800, which I really liked for indoor photography.

There's a mail order film developer place on the West Coast that does a nice job with the 800 speed Lomo, by the way.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I like this film. I like the results from it, and it's a great value. I'm not sure if this is actually repackaged Ferrania Solaris film or not, but I can verify that the manufacturer code on this film lists it as made by Ferrania. Ferrania Solaris used to run about $6 or $7 a roll, which would make this an awesome value. Either way I like the film, and will order some more.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews


Want to discover more products? Check out these pages to see more: lomo camera, photographic film