Most Helpful Customer Reviews
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Entertaining history in the classic style, April 21, 2004
This review is from: Lone Star Nation: How a Ragged Army of Volunteers Won the Battle for Texas Independence - and Changed America (Hardcover)
In the modern history profession, awash in tides of retrospective sociology, economic determinism, and "the rediscovered voices of marginalized peoples," the old-fashioned style of history and history-writing is sometimes belittled as "kings and battles." "Lone Star Nation" by H.W. Brands is very much a "kings and battles" book. Heavy on drama and personality and light on sociology, anthropology, and dry statistics, Brands' book is popular history told as an adventure story. It's an exciting adventure, and Brands has done a good job telling it. The "kings" here are the towering figures in the Texan epic: Austin, Houston, Bowie, Crockett, Travis, plus Santa Anna, Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, and a host of smaller players. And the battles are epic too: Not only the literal battles of the revolution, but Austin's fight to establish and defend his colony; Santa Anna's for political control in Mexico; the Alamo; Goliad; the battle in the U.S. Congress over annexation; and finally, Governor Sam Houston's losing fight against the secessionist drive in 1861. In many ways, the early sections of this book especially are a series of biographies, tied together by the common theme of the settlement of Texas. While most of these men come across as heroic, Brands' portrait of them is not unvarnished (the book isn't *that* old-fashioned). In fact, Brands shows how many of them achieved their heroic memory in spite of their failings, inadequacies, or downright unpleasantness. Similarly, I commend the author for his even-handed portrayal of Santa Anna, his unvarnished look at the slaughter that was the "battle" of San Jacinto (168 years ago today!) -- as well, of course, as the slaughters at the Alamo and Goliad -- and the decidedly unheroic influence of racism and nationalism on both sides of the fight. I've said in other reviews that I agree with the statement that all history is ultimately biography, and "Lone Star Nation" is definitely personality-driven history. More "serious" academic historians may view that as a failing. But the general fan, looking for an exciting true story with larger-than-life characters, could do a lot worse than to settle down in these pages and discover the causes and consequences of the story in which the Alamo played such a memorable part.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lone Star WINNER!, March 9, 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: Lone Star Nation: How a Ragged Army of Volunteers Won the Battle for Texas Independence - and Changed America (Hardcover)
We all have heard the story of the Alamo. By now must of us have heard that it's possible that Davy Crockett did not die in the fight but was executed after the battle was over. What H W Brands brings in this new volume of Texas History is just how unlikely the entire revolution was and how close it came to being crushed. A commander-in-cheif that had no real authority and a government in rebellion that would not or could not supply the army they ordered Sam Houston to raise. It really makes one wonder just how the heck they succeeded. It appears with some skill, a lot of luck and the desire to be independent. H W Brands makes all his subjects interesting and this one is no exception. READ THIS before going to see THE ALAMO!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A great story, well told, October 8, 2004
This review is from: Lone Star Nation: How a Ragged Army of Volunteers Won the Battle for Texas Independence - and Changed America (Hardcover)
Texas is sure of itself today, certain and confident of its place in the nation. Native Texans have occupied the White House, and held countless other positions of power, whether direct (Secretary James Baker) or indirect (e.g.,Colonel House under Wilson). That Texas was at once vastly uncertain as to its identity comes through clearly in Professor Brand's sharply written history. Austin came to Texas in fulfillment of his father's dying wish to colonize the state. To do so, he and countless others were willing to pledge allegiance to the Mexican flag. They were supportive of Santa Anna's commitment to federalism at one point (and then fought Santa Anna, and then sent him to Washington on their behalf, and fought him again, and embraced him later; he had, Brands' says, "more lives than a cat"). When the break with Mexico came, Texas experienced a period of independence during which she flirted with both Great Britain and France, and left open the possibility that if she were not annexed to the U.S., she might serve herself well by becomming a pawn in the efforts of both countries to halt U.S. expansion. Brands excells at biographical description -- Austin, Houston, Bowie, Crocket, and the rest are superbly rendered in his text. As to the lot of them, let it suffice to say that the founding fathers of Texas were not men who entered the region to "top off" already successful careers. Perhaps as a result, Texas, until the end of the civil war, seemed to represent, writ large, her anxious, impressionable and undisciplined founders. If the pioneers of Texas agreed on anything, it was that Texas was to be a new beginning. That dream went unfulfilled -- the withered "raisin in the sun" of Langston Hughes' imagery. This is because, try as it might, Texas, and the Texicans and tejanos never quite escaped being drawn into the vortex of larger forces, and the stress of pre-existing conflicts. What a great tale the Lone Star Nation conveys.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|