Most Helpful Customer Reviews
58 of 58 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
good travel information and hints; routine descriptions, June 5, 2001
In preparing for a trip to Hungary, I examined thoroughly the choices for Budapest. My favorite guidebook series has been Lonely Planet, and the Budapest Lonely Planet is fairly helpful. Although it doesn't give as thorough a treatment on accomodations, the book gives a lot of travel hints and secret. I found its facts for the visitors to be the most helpful, and the maps (placed at the very back of the book) to be the easiest to use. The frommer book, on the other hand, put the maps close to the section of the book referring to it. The organization of LP makes it easiest to use in the field; they tend to have the best background, history and cultural information. LP was particularly good about including rules, regulations and things like closing times. ON the other hand, there are not many photos, and they don't plan as many walking tours as the frommer book does. I didn't find the written descriptions that engaging, although the cultural background seemed well done. The Frommer's Budapest book (3rd edition) gave the best information about finding and choosing accomodations, but the book has no pictures and aside from a nice subway cover on the inside cover, the maps are hard to find and not very easy to use. Frommer's gives excellent information about prices and shops and restaurants; it's almost a guide to buying things rather than a tour book. I didn't find it particularly thorough about travel information, customs, or those sorts of details. That is not entirely fair. They have a nice section in the front a kind of "best of" list for things in budapest. The nice thing about the book is that it recommends things to do if you have only one day, three days or a week. They also suggested some itineraries for walking tours. The Fodor's Budapest pocket reference is drab and not full of much information. Don't get it. The Eyewitness Travel Guide on Budapest by Tadeusz Olszanski is the most eye-catching and the least helpful. It contains lots of graphics and diagrams and maps, and not too much information. The multitude of pictures are helpful in describing architecture, geography and art. On the other hand, its information on accomodations is very limited. Don't get me wrong; it's a beautiful and interesting book; it just is not as helpful as the other three. And it is two years old. I'm not necessarily saying that this book is bad, merely that it may not help you very much on the excursion. The Budapest: A Critical Guide by Andras Torok, 4th edition is a less complete and more personal account of things to do in Budapest. The other books were like encyclopedias, but this book was just a few personal recommendations about things to do and places to stay. Also, the writing for this book seems to be better than the other books. If you already are a little familiar with Budapest, but just want to learn about new and undiscovered places, this might be an excellent book. It certainly covers most of the bases, but it just doesn't try to list a huge number of accomodations or restaurants. I ended up buying the Frommer's and a used copy of the Eyewitness travel guide.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing for LP, July 7, 2011
This review is from: Lonely Planet Budapest (City Travel Guide) (Paperback)
I've used Lonely Planet travel guides several times in the past, and they are by far my favorite series of guide books. But that also means I have very high standards, and with this book, I was disappointed. The writing is only okay, certainly not as enjoyable to read as say, the Morocco or Southern Germany books. I usually get a little obsessed with reading about an upcoming trip - not being able to put the book down till I've finished, and then re-reading parts. But I've had a hard time getting myself to read this, even for the first time.
There are also a lot of mistakes. The book comes with a new key for one of the maps stuck into the front of it, because apparently the key that was printed was completely wrong. Several of the pictures in the introduction are in the wrong place (i.e. it says "see below" when it's actually above), or seem to be the wrong pictures entirely. There are many grammar and spelling errors, which is disruptive when reading.
Also, the author seems to have some trouble with left/right and east/west. He uses these incorrectly near the beginning (oddly enough in the section that's supposed to be orienting you). Then, later on, he writes that trains heading west leave from the east station and vice versa. I later discovered this to be true, and it would have been helpful if he had, for example, said that it was strange, so I didn't think it was yet another mistake.
One other complaint is the section at the beginning (the standard color section in LP) is unbelievably boring. It's about the Art Nouveau architecture in Budapest, and maybe it's just me and I didn't realize that I preferred reading about art or music or anything rather than architecture. But maybe it could have been done a little better.
All in all, I think it's an okay book, but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone without checking out some of the other Budapest books first. Lonely Planet, it needs an update and most importantly, a competent editor!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Fairly good guide, July 13, 2010
I live in Budapest, we gave it as a gift to a friend visiting the city. We were appreciated about the correctness but not amazed. We needed to put a lots of notes into it to upgrade it with the details of the real Budapest.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
