Lonely Planet Trekking in the Patagonian Andes (Lonely Planet Travel Survival Kit) [Paperback]

Clem Lindenmayer (Author)

Book Description

Series: Lonely Planet Travel Survival Kit | Publication Date: April 1992

A comprehensive trekking guide, this book includes over 28 detailed route descriptions, 27 trekking maps, an illustrated flora and fauna section, as well as a language and health section.

--This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Editorial Reviews

Review

...for the adventurous traveler who wants to live like a native.' --Real Simple Magazine, June 2005
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Product Details

• Paperback: 208 pages
• Publisher: Lonely Planet; 1st edition (April 1992)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0864421443
• ISBN-13: 978-0864421449
• Product Dimensions: 7.3 x 5 x 0.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (15 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,821,524 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

146 of 146 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars A helpful tool for experienced trekkers ... with a few snags, November 4, 1999

By A Customer

This review is from: Lonely Planet Trekking in the Patagonian Andes (2nd ed) (Paperback)

This is a fantastically comprehensive guide to the trekking areas of
the Patagonian Andes. Intelligently laid out with very
well-researched maps and local information, it also manages to give a
comprehensive overview of what each area has to offer, without being
exhaustive. It gives you just enough information to get you out there
and discovering on your own. The book does have a few weaknesses --
notably, there are flat-out errors in some of the specific route
descriptions or instructions -- that make it far better-suited to
those who feel comfortable fending for themselves in the wild, and who
don't try and use the book as a substitute for human guides. In
short, if you feel comfortable traveling independently in remote
areas, it's not a problem. If that scares you ... perhaps you should
use the book as a primer and then hire a guide or go with a guided
group.

Ratings for the treks are somewhat arbitrary; one trek rated
"easy" was actually quite rough, and the second half of the
route had been closed for over a year (prior to the book's publication
date -- a real boo-boo). Another trek rated "hard" was
actually not as challenging as advertised. However, the details of
the route descriptions are usually spot-on and very helpful. Most
wonderful are the maps, which experienced trekkers actually CAN use in
place of a topo (despite how foolish this sounds) in many cases.

The
photographs are wonderful, and also give an accurate and beautiful
rendering of the region's charms. I'd describe them as "trekking
porn," they're so luscious.

The information on base towns is
good but incomplete, and I would strongly recommend purchasing Wayne
Bernhardson's Lonely Planet guide to Chile as an accompaniment.

In
contrast, the Bradt book on backpacking in Argentina and Chile is
almost worthless compared to Lindemayer's careful descriptions and
research, and LP's superb regional maps.

Thanks

€ÿ

24 of 25 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Impressive guidebook to Patagonia, March 31, 2003

By 

Kylo Ginsberg (Portland, OR USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Lonely Planet Trekking in the Patagonian Andes (2nd ed) (Paperback)

We used this guidebook for 2+ months of backpacking
in Chile and I would strongly recommend it. The maps
can be used in lieu of topo maps (I would recommend
topos of course, but you can only get them in Santiago
and Buenos Aires) and the descriptions are remarkably
spot on. I've used dozens of backpacking guides (and
biking, climbing, ... guides) and there are invariably
inaccuracies or route descriptions that don't quite seem
to match. However, this book had fewer of such infelicities
than any guidebook I've used. Kudos to Lindemayer.

In addition, the "other treks" sections of the book
proved invaluable. After our first few weeks, we
realized we really wanted to get off the beaten track
and these little 1-3 paragraph route descriptions gave
us all we needed to track down information on beautiful,
rewarding, and untramelled hikes throughout Patagonia.
Lindemayer clearly has an explorer's impulse and a near
encyclopedic knowledge of the area.

Only caveat: if you're just going to Torres del Paine
and/or Los Glaciares you really don't need any guidebook;
the commonly available maps and steady streams of backpackers
on the trail will keep you well informed.

26 of 28 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars amazing hikes, erroneous details, July 28, 2004

By 

M. Dennis "the mad monk" (melbourne, vic, australia) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Lonely Planet Trekking in the Patagonian Andes (Walking) (Paperback)

This book is a perfect introduction to the wealth of hiking possibilities in patagonia - many of them are still significantly under-used and of equal calibre to the more famous routes. The general information sections are quite good, and give a good feel for what conditions are like both trekking and travelling in general; a good purchase for planning your trip. Where the book falls down is on the actual trekking notes, which are consistently inaccurate, obscenely outdated and sometimes quite misleading (see other reviews). On this front, Cerro Electrico is not safe - however Cerro Electrico Oeste is safely climbable without mountaineering equipment (although crampons are a nice idea) and gives mind-blowing views of the rear of Fitzroy - I think this might be what the author actually had in mind.

The best use of this book is as an introduction/inspiration, then get hold of decent military maps (plentiful in santiago and buenos aires) and local advice (abundant) and go from there. Given that many of the treks require some degree of independence and judgement (especially in snow-bound regions), pretty much any information should be taken with a grain of salt and certainly should be double-checked independantly or at worst against common sense. It is a pity no better alternative exists, but the general information is good and if prepared, leave the fun of route-finding up to yourself.