Qty:1

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Loos Cableware SL2-3 Plain Copper Duplex Oval Crimping Sleeve Set for 3/32" Diameter Wire Rope (50 Piece)

5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $17.68 ($17.68 / Each) & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
Only 8 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.

Specifications for this item
Brand Name Loos & Co.
Part Number SL2-3
Number of Items 50
Material Type Copper
UPC 736791025372
EAN 0736791025372
UNSPSC Code 39121404

Plain Copper Sleeve to fit 3/32" cable diameter, Mil Spec No. MS51844-43 See more product details


Gear Up for 2016

Product Features

  • Locoloc brand by Loos & Co.,Inc. Cableware Division
  • American made to highest quality standard
  • Economical solution for general purpose cable swaging applications
  • For use on wire rope of 3 by 7, 7 by 7, 7 by 19 and 6 by 19 construction
  • Copper sleeves same as MS51844 Military Spec

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 1.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • ASIN: B0038YY2B8
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #113,104 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific)
  • Manufacturer’s warranty can be requested from customer service. Click here to make a request to customer service.

Frequently Bought Together

  • Loos Cableware SL2-3 Plain Copper Duplex Oval Crimping Sleeve Set for 3/32" Diameter Wire Rope (50 Piece)
  • +
  • Loos Cableware AN100-C3 10 Piece Stainless Steel Thimble for 3/64", 1/16" and 3/32" Diameter Wire Rope
Total price: $21.69
Buy the selected items together

Product Description

Plain Copper Sleeve to fit 3/32" cable diameter, Mil Spec No. MS51844-43

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
works 10 times better than those U-Bolt devices.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse