Most Helpful Customer Reviews
18 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A history of economic malpractice, December 3, 2003
This review is from: The Looting of Social Security: How the Government is Draining America's Retirement Account (Paperback)
It is very difficult to navigate toward clarity on economic issues based on the information given in the media. Books recounting the full picture in slow motion have an advantage over the soundbite versions that clearly don't sink in. Disinformation tends to succeed, and as the author points out, basic economic education being a scarce commodity, even journalists and politicians themselves are confused, an important point to remember. It's a fact of life that even a well-educated person must reckon with his proneness to being disinformed and this appalling short account of history of the Social Security crisis since 1983 is a more than useful expose of the sorry history here. Beyond that tale which has been told before, mostly in vain, it is also a cutting expose of the current monumental swindle going on with the Bush manipulations of the budget and deficit, also with a clear fingerpointing at the blunder/lie behind Clinton's myth of the budget surplus that handed the Bush gang a golden opportunity to front their conservative sabotage. Clinton's dose of sanity rescuing the system from the Reagon/Bush disaster got frittered away in one stroke by the new round of the voodoo artists, right in front of our eyes. The sheer impudent and premeditated brazenness of the tactics takes one's breath away, and it is no surprise we have been treated to near flood of books about the Bush Lies. The saddest thing is that voters can't grasp their own self-interest. It is good that while partisan in one way the author clearly traces the onset of 'voodoo economics' as far back as the Johnson presidency, and in telling the whole history of this and Reaganomics he brings out something we don't always notice, that competent economists have documented in some alarm every stage of the whole business, only to be shunted aside by presidents listening only to their political advisers. The portrait of the future of Social Security and the future deficit is very alarming and one is left baffled at these politicians in their malevolence. A contract with America ought to read 'a contract on America' as in mafia hit language. The book is slightly repetitive, perhaps written in a hurry, but very much worth reading. In most fields malpractice is an indictable offense. Apparently presidents are to be an exception. Enough's enough.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The truth hurts?, April 16, 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: The Looting of Social Security: How the Government is Draining America's Retirement Account (Paperback)
Smith is absolutely correct in his main contention, which is that Bush II paid for his tax cuts by using the Social Security surplus. This is all the more appalling when you consider that Social Security is a regressive tax (it only applies to the first $85,000 of everyone's income, including Bill Gates), while the Bush II tax cuts mostly benefit the rich. David Cay Johnston makes a similar point in his excellent book, Perfectly Legal. And can anyone doubt that the right wing will use this to bolster its claims that Social Security is "broke," paving the way for privatization or other ways to dismantle it?
I see from reviews here that the freeper attack dogs are nervous about this line of argument. Sadly, their (his?) understanding of economics does not match their (his or her?) passion. Yo, Reader from California: anyone who reads reviews for a book such as this knows that it's not the "Democrats' fault" that the Reagan and Bush II tax cuts led to deficits. Reagan wanted his huge increase in military spending, and Bush II enjoys a Republican House and Senate. And Micsca (are you the same person as "Reader" -- same state, same posting date, same dogma): your vaunted increase in tax revenues several years after the Reagan tax cuts was due merely to a growing population and workforce. Yet the tax cuts caused revenues to be lower than they would have been. Which Smith clearly explains and which you would know if you had actually read the book. Why bother to spin such nonsense to an educated audience? [Note -- the poster(s) referred to above appear(s) to have edited his(their) post to change the posting name and location.]
As for the rants about supply side economics, I have a degree from one of the 10 best graduate schools in this country, and supply side economics is dead. The only "data" showing that it works come from nordic countries that had marginal tax rates over 70% -- not our country at all.
Brookings and other economists have pointed out that the Bush tax cuts make up the same percent of our economy (GDP) as would be required to fix both Social Security and Medicare. Drag corporations back from their overseas tax havens (the 35% statutory rate is a joke), and where's the problem?
The book was a little repetitive, but I give it 5 stars because I revile these freeper "assassination" attempts.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Looting Social Security Money, February 25, 2011
This book reveals how, since the 1983 "fix" of Social Security, a Social Security Trust Fund was created because of a significant raise in FICA taxes aimed at preparing Social Security for the retiring baby boomers. Instead the surplus money that started appearing in 1985 was immediately diverted to pay for tax cuts, that favored the wealthy, paid for unfunded wars and Medicare Part D, along with other government expenses. As the money was emptied special bonds which were basically government IOU's were put in the fund so that now all that remains are the IOU's that amount to approximately 2.5 trillion dollars not including the interest that the money would have earned.
This should be mandatory reading for all Americans especially now that Social Security is being threatened with massive cuts.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|