Most Helpful Customer Reviews
27 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting At Times, October 18, 2009
This review is from: Losing the News: The Future of the News that Feeds Democracy (Institutions of American Democracy) (Hardcover)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program (What's this?)
There is no question that Alex S. Jones has more than enough credentials to write a book such as "Losing the News." His vast experience at a variety of levels in the field of journalism, combined with his sense of thoughtfulness, make for an author who should excel at penning a book on the history and future of the news. "Losing the News," succeeds at times, but also falls short to some extent in giving an accurate analysis of the current newspaper crisis.
First off, this book will prove to be a valuable read for people who have little to no knowledge of the role of print media in America over the decades. Jones skillfully explains how print journalism has evolved over the years, and why it has been important for the survival of democracy. However, there is not any groundbreaking information presented for people already familiar with such areas.
The most interesting aspect of Jones' book is his discussion of the erosion of the iron core of "accountability" news. Jones is highly critical of the television news' propensity to offer up opinionated talking heads in place of solid news reporting. He also is critical of the increase, over the years, by media outlets to stray away from hard news, and instead do more reporting of personal interest and entertainment stories. His argument is that this phenomenon leaves people less informed, therefore weakening democracy on the whole.
Jones also discusses in detail the concept of "citizen journalism" brought on by the Internet. He obviously feels that the proliferation of blogs and nontraditional news web sites are a threat to traditional journalism. Jones strongly believes that in order to be called a journalist, one needs to be trained as a journalist. He states, "The concepts of citizen journalism and soliciting reader input are hot at newspapers, which are looking for ways to engage people as well as to capitalize on the expertise that is undeniably out there. But that is not journalism I see it." Additionally, he speaks on the subject of how to finance journalists in an age of declining newspaper revenues and increase in news on the Internet that is free to users.
There are a couple of problems I have with "Losing the News." First, Jones does not attribute nearly enough importance to the filtering of news by the corporate interests of the owners of media sources. Perhaps the reason for the large rise in citizen journalism is because the traditional news sources are indeed filled with fluff and are negligent in giving unbiased hard news and solid investigative journalism. This leads me to my second criticism -- how does Jones think the news can be saved? Jones' prescription for saving the news is, "Journalists must hold fast and persevere. Owners must do the right thing. And citizens and news consumers must notice and demand the news that they need." Well, that is a nice thought, but far from practical advice as to how to save the news as Jones desires. Anyone with a reasonable level of understanding of the economics and technological change in the news business can immediately see that Jones' prescription is fanciful at best.
In closing, "Losing the News" does serve as a good primer for learning a basic history of journalism in America. It also raises some good questions about the direction the news has taken over the decades, especially more recently with the rise of the Internet. Unfortunately, there is a glossing over of the magnitude of corporate control of the media, which in turn leads to some significant errors in diagnosing some of the pressing problems in the media, as well as the prescription to remedying these problems.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Must Read, July 23, 2009
This review is from: Losing the News: The Future of the News that Feeds Democracy (Institutions of American Democracy) (Hardcover)
Losing the News challenges the reader to assess the importance of news---its purpose, content, value, delivery and business mechanisms, and ethics. And, in that assessment, the reader reevaluates the importance of his or her responsibility as an `every day' American citizen and consumer of media information.
Who is this reader Alex S. Jones addresses? In keeping with major themes of the text---how news interacts with democracy, Jones writes this book for those who love to read print newspapers, for those who are connected to news electronically, for lovers of US history, government, ethics, and all social sciences, for newspaper people and journalists, elected officials, policy makers, and private citizens. The wise teacher or professor who wishes to deliver a dynamic, thought-provoking, provocative (and, probably, the most popular on campus) course will use this book as a text.
But, most of all, Losing the News is for people who love good books. Written by a master storyteller, the prose is gorgeous. Jones' style empowers the reader to enjoy the book from his or her unique experience.
I noticed the Amazon release date for Losing the News is August 19; a very fitting date as it is the birthday of the great 20th century British writer and fierce journalistic defender of freedom, Bernard Levin, CBE. Whether your purchase is print or Kindle (ironic chuckle), Losing the News by Alex S. Jones is a must read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
THE PAINFUL TRUTH, December 19, 2009
This review is from: Losing the News: The Future of the News that Feeds Democracy (Institutions of American Democracy) (Hardcover)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program (What's this?)
When given the option, many people choose an easy lie, rather than face the hard, painful truth. Have you watched the TV newscasts recently? Read local papers recently? As a society, we have either chosen, or have stuffed down our throat, the easy lie. LOSING THE NEWS faces the hard, painful truth-as a society, our tradition of OBJECTIVE TRUTH has been slowly eraised from the media outlets, and replaced with Opinionated Journalism, or worse, gossip columns maskarading as news stories. Alex Jones has revealed a book of masterful scholarship, filled with revelation upon revelation about the history of the American Newspaper, the Supreme Court decisions about freedom of the press, the evolution of Television newscasts, the dependency of a free democracy on reliable news, and the downfall of the veracity of our media, and its replacement with "Advocacy news", a.k.a. propaganda. I can't say I read this book quickly, or with much joy. Instead, I underlined many passages, complained to friends about new facts I'd just discovered, or watched dumbfounded as information I just learned made clear the filtering of news stories in the local paper. This is not an easy book to read, because it's the truth, the hard, painful truth about the erosion of the US media outlets.
Alex Jones was raised in a Newspaper family, that owned the GREENEVILLE SUN (in Greeneville, Tenn.) He watched as newspapers revealed the sham of WATERGATE, and the downfall of a president, accomplished by investagative reporters. Then, the terrible realization that due to the cuts in staffs, even our country's major papers dont have the ability to snoop around and discover the dark underbelly, and deceptions of our government, or corperations, and reveal them to the public. Jones worked at the NEW YORK TIMES from 1983 to 1992, and won a Pulitzer Prize. His observations aren't the ramblings of opinion makers, but rather a detailed account of the rise of investigative reporting, and its downfall. An entire chapter of the book just documents the history of the First Admendment, guarenteeing freedom of the Press, and how that was slowly refined during the nation's history. Of course, this will be "news" to most people, because no doubt most people believe we always had freedom of the Press and free speech. Surprisingly, its only about 75 years old. Naturally, the rise in "Advocacy News" is well documented. FoxNEWS might be many things, but its not news reporting of course, in the sense that news must have objective, verifiable facts, and be loyal to the citizens and not corperations or political interests. When these disciplines are not met, we are left with propaganda, pure and simple. Since a truly free, democratic government cannot be maintained without the oversight of investigative news, our democracy is threatened. Big time. This is not shouted from the corner of the street, by some homeless skizophrenic, but rather by a man who is the Director of Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on the Press, and lectures at the Kennedy School of Government. He knows his facts, and each fact is thoroughly and completely documented in this book. I can't think you could get a better understanding of Journalism, and media, from any other modern book. The bottom line is that things are changing FAST in the world of journalism, and nearly ALL the changes are towards opinions superceding documented facts. As a free democracy, if we dont monitor what we accept as news, and especially NOW, we will lose our freedom of press and speech. Consider reading this book as a investigative reporter, who is trying to discover what happened, and what IS happening, to the state of American News. Even if you think Fox News is the be all and end all of journalistic validity, and that the "liberal media" is attempting to destroy your freedom to unbaised truth, it would still behoove you to READ AND STUDY this book. Or, if you're on the other side of the fence, and you already know that our media is filtered, you should STILL read this book. Unless you've a masters in journalism, you definately do NOT know what's revealed in this book. Its great to complain and gripe. Its better to attempt to make changes, thru using facts, and history, so we can preserve what is left of independant, investigative reporting, and our country's tradition of freedom of Speech and Press.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|