Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Please disregard this review if you enjoyed the first book,
This review is from: The Lost Runes (The Runespell Trilogy #2) (Paperback)
However if, like me, you didn't really enjoy the first book, but you have a vague desire to find out what happens and a vague hope that the series will improve, I suggest you give up now. As in the first book, the world is well developed, the book is well written and there are some interesting ideas. But the characters continue to be annoying and the plot continues to dawdle. I gave up on this book halfway through, which is probably the worst thing I could say about a book.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A progressive follow-up effort from a truly gifted author.,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Lost Runes (The Runespell Trilogy #2) (Paperback)
This is an excellent book which gives a glimpse of the authors prodigous talent, which is later realised in the fourth book, 'The Lament Of Abalone". Following on from the impressive debut, The Runes Of War, the story picks up pace as the author solidifies her characters and brings extra cohesiveness to the plot. Once again, the colour and descriptiveness of the writing is wonderful, making for easy suspension of disbelief and stunning mental imagery.There is a natural and realistic flow to the development of the characters - and it begins to become apparent who the real heroine of the story is. The interaction of arrogant Hal, shy Casper and high priestess Brid is superb, with all the complexities of a 3-way relationship dealt with very skillfully. The story develops nicely, all the while enjoyable and refreshing - with the lines between good and evil still bleary as the 'heroes' are confronted by a people dying of starvation, acting purely on the will-to-live. A top read !
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Settles Somewhat Though Problems From First Book Persist,
By Elyon (Mesilla, New Mexico) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Lost Runes (The Runespell Trilogy #2) (Paperback)
As with a previous reviewer, I continued this series from "Runes of War" hoping this series would find its focus. To a degree it has: description continues to be the series' strength, and the author has in large part abandoned the repetitive and unevolving self-recrimination I found so wearisome with the characters of Spar and Branwolf in the first book. However, this remains a travel-bound text, the ongoing and apparently never ending quest providing an excuse for a fair number of incidental and--in terms of plot focus--irrelevant adventures that are left to sustain the reader's interest. After a time this plot device becomes very wearisome and predictable.The main characters, while evolving somewhat, still seem essentially rooted to the characters established in the first book, with often the secondary actors, such as May or Cybillia, providing the greater character development and interest. The primary villains remain attenuated, serving only provide the occasional threat, and again we find secondary figures such as Gatto providing much of the conflict within the narrative, while more important characters, such as Gwion, remain mostly as phantoms. And, after dragging himself around through much of the book to little purpose, the dragon simply swims away into the sunset. There is an uncomfortable and seemingly random blend of various borrowings from myth and religion, creating a hodgepodge cosmology incorporating Nordic, Celtic, Christian, and Greco-Roman traditions that at times merge uneasily, such as with the Satanic rites revolving around the worship of Lokki. All of this seems baldly uninventive and derivitive, lacking the imaginitive strength of authors such as Hobb, Jordan or Tolkien, who, though they have borrowed, recontextualized their mythic sources enough to in large part recreate their own cosmologies, or missing the narrative purity of others such as Kerr, Marillier or Bradley, who have chosen to create their stories around the legends of a particular mythology. This blithe tossing about of mythic references seems contrived and carelessly implemented. Finally, while descriptively rich, this alone is not enough to successfully carry the story. This tale needs greater and tighter plot development, as well as depth of characterization. Also, the author has a bad habit of inaptly using language: The repeated and inappropriate use of individual words--insipid hair and turgid air of apprehension but two of many instances, these words in particular problematic in their repeated usage--create unnecessary questions as to the author's understanding of language, unfortunate when considering the strength of her description narrative elsewhere, though, in fairness, her editor should have caught this. While I would not dismiss this trilogy and, if allowed, would give it a half star more, the first two books contain persisting problems that do much to undermine and ennervate its narrative and emotional power. Tighter plot focus and greater character development will be needed in future for this author's work to rise above the ordinary.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|