37 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Thought-provoking; communicating his view quite fairly, August 27, 2006
This review is from: The Lotus and the Cross: Jesus Talks with Buddha (Hardcover)
The author attempts to be fair AND to communicate his own view, his own conclusions. This means the book is a short vehicle to present some of his own understanding of the differences between Jesus and Buddha, and to show you his view, his side on the question of how to evaluate Jesus or Buddha.
Some would attempt to be fair and withold their own conclusion if it should be on one side or another, but his point is to respectfully present his side, to SHOW what's going on in his understanding when he looks at Buddhism and Christianity, the claims, the culture, the founders, the sorrows of human life.
It succeeds where other attempts might fail, in that it is not heavy handed and given the short space he does attempt to fairly express views other than his own.
The dialog does not sound stylistically like either the Jesus in various Gospels nor Buddha in various Sutras. It is interesting when Jesus says something that sounds like it is very much along the lines of what might be said in Buddhist lingo, and vice versa when the Buddha says something that relates to things often said in Christian lingo.
It is thought-provoking whatever one's view, and it is clear enough that the author is primarily trying to show his own understanding of Jesus Christianity in contrast to his understanding of Buddhism through his travels in Buddhist cultures and remembering his childhood in India.
It cannot go into too much depth on some things, that isn't unfair it's just a hazard of such a subject, particularly in a short book. But the complexities or critiques that could be made, can open up an interesting discussion, so this book does serve as a discussion-starter, and it does raise some challenges very well, whatever one's view on Buddhism vis-a-vis Christianity.
Is it Christian Apologetic? Yes and no, depending on what you mean or expect by 'Christian Apologetics' -- it is not a heavy-handed comparison or disection of Buddhism like you would find in a truly theological journal, despite raising deeply theological issues, nor is it vague or superficial as Lee Stoebel's work is, despite the popular format and casual style. If it is said to be Apologetics, then it is Apologetic simply in that it presents a Christian Author's reflections and does not attempt to hide his specifically Christian conclusions, from his own understanding of Christianity.
While it raises challenges to Buddhism and endorses Christianity, it does not demonize Buddhism nor does it ignore or minimize challenges to the actions and attitudes of Christian followers. It presents enough about Buddhism (the 4 noble truths, ideas of no-self, some things about Buddhsit culture, etc) to serve as a starting point for further discussion, and if people informed by Buddhism engage in that discussion, with Christians, then the result will in fact lead to greater understanding and depth of thought, for many people, and these are good things.
Does it succeed? This is why it isn't like the sort of Apologetics one finds elsewhere... it isn't pretending to defeat Buddhism, I don't think it is trying to, I think it is exploring differences in a way that highlights and affirms what the author sees as strengths in Christianity and the importance of Jesus. It is more like the inobtrusive evangelism that demonstrates by example: not demonizing others, not lecturing others, but living and speaking in accord with one's spirituality.
As a Gnostic with interest in Christianity, Buddhism, and various Christian 'heresies', I found the book to be very good.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
45 of 56 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The beginning of the end..., January 1, 2007
A Kid's Review
This review is from: The Lotus and the Cross: Jesus Talks with Buddha (Hardcover)
I was born and raised to two lefty quasi-Buddhist parents that indoctrinated me with the philosophical pap that passes for Buddhism in the West.
A woman I met on an airplane handed me this book to look at and, at first glance, I scoffed at it but the woman was very gracious and I assured her that I would peruse it later...
Now, I am a born-again Christian and this book was the first step I took in that direction.
Some of the criticisms I have read on this site are valid, as Zacharias does not provide an all-encompassing refutation in this small work--but I don't think he was meaning to (its only like 100 pages), simply giving someone (perhaps like myself) their first critical glance at the Buddhist faith/philosophy and exploring some of the difficult implications that most Buddhists either ignore or suppress.
No, this book does not bring down the hammer and utterly refute Buddhism--but it can be used as an introduction to the ways of Buddhism and how they pale before the Ways of The Master.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
36 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Unfair, Biased, and Disappointing, August 5, 2002
This review is from: The Lotus and the Cross: Jesus Talks with Buddha (Hardcover)
Prior to this I was a huge Ravi Zacharias fan. I found in him a voice that was not afraid to tackle some of the biggest problems in theology. I was extremely disapointed with this book. Its a very quick read, which is its first major flaw. However, I was shocked at some of the glaring liberties Zacharias takes to generalize Buddhism for the sake of defending Christianity. In fact, the entire premise of his book is faulty as any Buddhist will tell you Guatama Buddha has little to do with the religion of Buddhism. Refer to any beginners text on the subject of Buddhism and you will find that "Buddha" is never used in a specific sense to signify a single person in time (Guatama for example) as Christians use the word "Jesus Christ". "Buddha", literally means "enlightened one" and is rarely, if ever, deduced to mean Guatama, the Buddha (notice it is "the" Buddha--Guatama was one of many--not even the first for that matter!). Beyond this, Zacharias fails to recognize that there are thousands of sects of Buddhism, many of which are vastly different theologically from the teachings he uses to frame Buddhism.
Please do not misunderstand. I do respect Dr Zacharias. However, he commits many gross errors and provides the reader with no real understanding of the nature of Buddhism. I worked in a Christian Bookstore for close to two years and know first hadn that much Christian literature on other religions is "filtered" and simplified to the point where the religion being denounced loses all verility. If you are a Christian and you are reading this try to see it from the other side: imagine a Buddhist writing a book about why Christianity is wrong using a conversation between A (note, "a") Buddha, and the pope--where only the rules of Catholicism are debated....or if you are a catholic imagine a book which defends Christianity from a Pentecostal, or Baptist, or Lutheran perspective. Its unfair and oversimplified.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No