18 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Too Many Questions Unchallenged, March 4, 2000
Philosophy lends itself to the discovery of, and arguments over, Great Questions. For instance, the Question of Evil--how does evil exist in a world created by an all-powerful, all-good Creator?--has been debated for centuries since its discovery by early Christian thinkers.
Much of Mr. Rescher's book is an engaging, well-researched series of observations about the role of luck in human affairs, many of which are used to make the frequent point that nothing is 'responsible' for the operation of luck. "Luck pivots on unpredictability," says the author, and backs this up with both historical and hypothetical events in which fate acts in defiance of what its object deserves--either for good or ill.
Yet in making these points, the author either avoids or ignores larger questions that naturally follow from his examples. While he observes that chance frowned upon the passengers of the Titanic and the Jews of World War Two-era Poland, he avoids the related observation that chance frowned more heavily upon the poor passengers and Jews than upon the wealthy and influential. The author defends as rational the impulse to buy a lottery ticket, since a chance at a fortune is better than no chance, yet he ignores that a person who is already wealthy has no need of this fortune, and thus feels no such 'rational' urge.
About two-thirds of the way through the book, the author considers that individual traits bestowed or withheld by luck might have some moral significance, yet--in a tone that seems directly the opposite of the book's previous chapters--he satisfies himself with an oddly bourgeois rule: we are responsible for our moral virtue, regardless of how much of that virtue has been chosen for us by luck or fate. The author wants to insist on this rule so that villains can be condemned for being villains before they perform any wicked acts. Yet this seemingly common-sense position leads to a far more puzzling question: to what degree can one reasonably separate chance from intent? The author points out that a drunk driver who gets home safely is lucky, while a sober driver who kills another motorist by accident is unlucky, but does this distinction of luck really make the drunkard more morally reprehensible than the killer? What if the sober driver was an alcoholic, but had simply not had the chance to get drunk?
The toughest questions arise when the author sternly observes that "We are not morally responsible for _choosing_ our bad character (character is not the sort of thing that is up for choice), but we are morally responsible--and morally reprehensible--for _having_ it." If we are somehow responsible for having bad character chosen for us, are we also responsible for bad circumstances chosen for us? Is a poor child somehow morally responsible for being born into poverty rather than wealth? "Identity must precede luck," states the author. But where environment informs identity, and luck informs environment, can such a statement remain true, if it ever was?
What the author ends up doing in this book is brushing the snow away from around a Great Question: how is justice possible in a world where chance is the predominant force for action? By failing to consider this question and the lesser questions that attend it, Mr. Rescher's book, while enjoyable, remains less than what it could have been.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A must for those perplexed by the curious turns in our lifes, April 1, 1999
Rescher's book is a most readable conceptual framework on the role of randomness in our everyday life. Things suchs as destiny, fate and risk are dealt in an clear and elegant fashion. The fact that the book was written by an eminent philosopher does not preclude reading by the layman. On the contrary, the author relates all conceptual framework to aspects of our everyday life.Furthermore there is a sense of humour that permeates the whole text. The book is a must for those bewildered by the curious ways a life may evolve.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
ALL THE LUCK IN THE WORLD, May 17, 1996
By A Customer
How much can be said about luck's role in our lives, aside from the fact that it is all-encompassing? The answer, author Rescher shows us, is plenty indeed. Take Rescher's illustration of the connection between luck and morality, for instance. Suppose a young man burglarizes the home of his grandfather. However, on the night of the theft, the grandfather passes away, bequeathing all of his worldly possessions to his grandson. Is the grandson guilty of a crime? Legally, no. Through the intervention of luck, he was merely stealing -- relocating! -- his own belongings. And yet in his mind he was up to something very nefarious indeed.
Rescher's narrative, while mildly academic in tone, brims with the engaging and imaginative scenario-spinning that is a brilliant philosopher's forte (Rescher is a distinguished professor of philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh.)
Whether he's writing about luck's role in war, finance, sports, Vegas, love, or death, Rescher, with this book, shows us how fascinating a learned philosophical reverie can be. LUCK is heartily recommended to readers whose intellects permit them to look beyond the notion, "Luck -- either you have it or you don't."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
![[Start the discussion]](http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/x-locale/communities/discussion_boards/start-new-discussion-sec._V192250339_.gif){kind=small}
