Amazon.com: MacArthur and Defeat in the Philippines (9781585671182): Richard Connaughton: Books

Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
$9.74 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Sell Back Your Copy
For a $1.15 Gift Card
Trade in
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
MacArthur and Defeat in the Philippines
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

MacArthur and Defeat in the Philippines [Hardcover]

Richard Connaughton (Author)
3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  
Unknown Binding --  

Book Description

September 10, 2001
By an expert on the war in the Philippines, a riveting portrait of perhaps America's greatest and very likely most controversial generals at one of the critical moments of World War II.

For many, Douglas MacArthur was a general to be ranked with Grant and Lee; for others he was much bluster and some cowardice. The truth, according to military historian Richard Connaughton, lies somewhere in the middle. MacArthur and Defeat in the Philippines is a judicious and hard-headed portrait of a courageous general and deeply flawed man.

Douglas MacArthur was born into a military family in 1880, and the need to measure up to the heroic example set by his father drove MacArthur. MacArthur's best qualities would be undone by his arrogance, vanity, deviousness and a truly breathtaking capacity for making enemies-FDR chief among them-and so when MacArthur arrived in the Philippines in the mid-30s it was as an exile from Roosevelt's anger.

The Philippines were something of a family business for the MacArthur clan (his father had distinguished himself there at the turn of the century). Against all the odds, he assured Washington and the Philippine government of the islands' defensibility against a Japanese attack. In holding this view, Connaughton argues, MacArthur was proceeding on a notion with as much romance to it as military good sense. Willfully blind to the impending crisis, MacArthur and his troops were vulnerable to attack when it came finally in late December of 1941.

MacArthur and Defeat in the Philippines is a fascinating study of Douglas MacArthur and the crisis of leadership as well as a focussed study of one of the pivotal moments in World War II.


Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

If we are to trust military historian Richard Connaughton's account, the Japanese forces that invaded the Philippines shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor were fortunate that they faced Douglas MacArthur and not some competent and cautious general like Joseph Stilwell. MacArthur, writes Connaughton, "was a distant, remote, suspicious, and brooding man whose ego set him apart from others in the services."

There's no news in that assessment--MacArthur was infamous long before the Japanese attack for his imperious manner and sense of infallibility, and during the siege of Corregidor he earned the nickname "Dugout Doug" for secluding himself in a bunker far from his troops. What does come as news is in Connaughton's in-depth analysis of MacArthur's multifaceted failings as commander of American forces in the Philippines, which include his refusal to accept intelligence reports on the whereabouts and strength of his enemy, his failure to integrate Filipino forces effectively, and his strategically inept forward defense--all of which afforded an undersize Japanese invading force a comparatively easy victory.

Connaughton, a retired colonel in the British Army, has no particular stake in defending or disparaging MacArthur, around whom stands a lively literature both pro and con. In fairness, he observes, the American defense of the Philippines was doomed in any event; and, he adds, "MacArthur made monstrous blunders but it was not all his fault; he had a lot of help." His book throws new light on a crucial episode in the history of World War II, and it is likely to excite debate among students of military history. --Gregory McNamee

From Publishers Weekly

A retired colonel in the British army, Connaughton (The Battle for Manila) finds the famed WWII general was so governed by his flaws that even when faced with evidence to the contrary, MacArthur persisted in his belief that the Japanese military was both undertrained and inferior and that the Philippine army was a superior fighting force. The truth of the islands' perilous situation came to a tragic end, with the Philippines' defenders vanquished by the Japanese, literally wasting away from starvation. MacArthur's own memoirs are filled with pathos when describing those desperate days on Bataan and Corregidor, but, Connaughton writes, the wrenching scenes recalled by the general were "mostly fabrication." Not everyone will accept this Englishman's entire view of America and its history. American Indians, for example, might take issue with Connaughton's claim that the United States' 19th-century expansionist policy known as Manifest Destiny "was not a militaristic concept." Overall, though, this is a thoughtful and refreshing work that adds a worthwhile telling to a familiar American tale, but its restricted subject should make for a restricted audience. Photos and maps not seen by PW.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.


Product Details

  • Reading level: Ages 18 and up
  • Hardcover: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Overlook Hardcover; 1st edition (September 10, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1585671185
  • ISBN-13: 978-1585671182
  • Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 6.2 x 1.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,235,219 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

6 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.8 out of 5 stars (6 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Adultery, Vanity, Pride, Imperiousness, Narcissism..., July 18, 2010
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
All the Seven Deadly Sins are here, rolled into one man, the American Caesar, the Actor, Doug-out-Doug MacArthur. This man should have been court-marshaled after he allowed the Japanese to attack on December 8, 1941, without resistance. His vanity and over-weaning pride always stood in the way of his making correct decisions, and not just in the Philippines. The author gives us the whole sordid story of MacArthur's sorry performance in the Philippines, prior to, and after the Japanese attacked. No stone is left unturned as we learn that he was only interested in himself; even at graduation from West Point, selecting the Engineers, just because he had been told (wrongly) that it would help him rise rapidly in rank. He was a mama's boy, (she lived near the Plain at West Point, in order to keep an eye on him). MacArthur was so paranoid, that he saw others as either inferiors or competitors. He had the ability to talk nonsense with confidence, which served not only to delude others, but also himself. He was a man of impulses and moods, often insensitive to reason and logic; temperamental to the last degree...a prima donna of the first order. He was adroit and dramatic, and knew exactly how to play his cards to win his public. His persona was everything, having persuaded Philippine President Quezon to bestow on him the title "Field Marshal" with another uniform of his own design. He was so inept, and tried to fool President Quezon that the Japanese wouldn't want to attack the Philippines. After the war, he would insist that it was the boldness of his defense plans which had prompted the Japanese attack!

Connaughton lays the ground work early in his book, by looking at MacArthur's malfeasance in WWI. The description of another of his self-made uniforms (one of his nicknames was the "Beau Brummell of the AEF": he wore no helmet, carried no gas mask or weapon, except a riding crop!); is an appropriate inclusion here, in addition to descriptions of his buck-passing mentality, while serving under General Pershing. Over and over, through carefully researched and documented incidents, we get a sense of a man who was obsessed with his own public image, in his vindictive performance dealing with the Bonus Army. I have consistently used the word "performance," because, in my opinion, that's what he was good at: acting.

Of course, he was good in the bedroom as well, having a mistress, "Dimples" Cooper, who he brought back with him from an early Philippine tour, and had her ensconced in a Washington area apartment; later having to pay big bucks to get back his love letters from her. Further instability of his family life is evidence by his divorce from a woman, who herself, was previously divorced, (a woman who had been a mistress of General Pershing); and his later re-marriage, which produced one son, who, we must suppose, was so humiliated by his father's antics, that he later changed his surname, and now lives in obscurity in New York City. Rumor has it he is gay.

That MacArthur had an affair is not surprising, given the leniency he allowed his enlisted troops to have while on their single un-accompanied tours in the Philippines: they were allowed to live with native women away from the barracks. Many of the men, on second tours, lived with Filipino girls in their villages. Enlisted men bought or built for $50.00 their own "nipa" huts. MacArthur thus allowed and condoned his men to live with an unmarried woman in the villages. Alcoholism and venereal disease were reported as endemic in the 31st Infantry. Living off the base with a temporary partner served, in his mind, to reduce the incidence of both, and so a food allowance was paid to encourage this adulterous form of cohabitation.

The book also includes details about the Japanese spies that abounded everywhere, and what was not done about them. Attention is paid to MacArthur's hand-picked staff; one that provided him loyalty over expertise. It was more of a court than a staff. A number of them mentioned in the book, had shared characteristics: each carried a chip on both shoulders, each was sometimes childishly sensitive, and each was convinced that MacArthur was the greatest man who ever lived.

His relations with Roosevelt were condescending, and with the Navy brass, they were worse. This was the exact opposite of the situation in Hawaii, where there was an excellent relationship between Admiral Kimmel and General Short. Power and authority both within the Philippine Commonwealth and its links to America, were tangled, exacerbated by the continuous and trivial machinations of MacArthur. Many documented cases are given of MacArthur's projected mannerisms when dealing with those he disliked in the civilian and military government. Out of his blazing ego poured a steady torrent of self-centered oratory: elegant, polished and sculpted. Visitors stated that his voice crackled and shuddered with taut emotion, lightning flashed from his eyes as he paced nervously, leaving his visitors to listen with apprehensive dismay and discomfort.

The author gives many, well-researched, instances of MacArthur's pettiness. If he did attend a dinner with Quezon, which was rare, he would not attend if the seating arrangements were not to his liking. He quibbled over any felt slight, including whether Quezon was entitled to a 21-gun salute. He plainly relished idolatry. He stayed in his ivory tower of the Manila Hotel penthouse; visitors reported that his skin had pallor; had trembling hands; and the vanity which required him to comb his thinning black hair from left ear to right, thereby covering a large bald spot. MacArthur was a showman and his only salvation from forced retirement came, when the Philippine Army was called into the service of the United States. MacArthur was like the proverbial Phoenix rising from the ashes; called to command; there was no one else available on-site.

Excellent research is presented giving the reader a very detailed review of the nine hours following the attack on Pearl Harbor...after MacArthur had been notified, and directed BG Sutherland not to allow MG Brereton in to see him with his request to send up the air force, and attack the Japanese on Formosa, before they did the same to Clark Field, et.al. The loading of bombs had to await MacArthur's orders, which were not forthcoming until 11 am....too late. After the war, MacArthur of course, denied Brereton's version of events, but the papers and files, since discovered, tell the real truth.

Despite many hours advance warning, and having had the Magic intercept and decoding means (which Admiral Kimmel and General Short were denied by Washington), U.S. air power in the Philippines was virtually neutralized on the first day of the war! MacArthur continued to state that his was to defend the Philippines, not attack! He was under the delusion that the Philippines would remain neutral. This is also confirmed by the author in the discovery of a conversation between Quezon and General Eisenhower in Eisenhower's papers. Some Clare Boothe Luce papers recently found, also confirm MacArthur's refusal to act. Another author, William H. Bartsch, has also explored MacArthur's inability to act. December 8, 1941: MacArthur's Pearl Harbor (Texas A&M University Military History Series, 87.)

As the author states, there should have been a high level investigation of MacArthur following the Philippine debacle on December 8th. Other generals were called to account for their shortcomings in the first months of the Pacific war, but he never was.

His "I shall return" became an obsession. His insistence on conquering all of the Philippines in 1945, ended in a needless effort that cost thousands of lives and much damage. Manila was destroyed in order to be saved: for every Japanese defender, ten natives in the city died...the majority to American firepower. His vision was distant, remote, suspicious, and egocentric. In his thinking, in his performance, he was a 19th century imperial warrior; a self-proclaimed expert on Far Eastern affairs. His self-delusion would remain throughout his years, including the Korean Conflict. But, even as Eisenhower would admit, America was in the early stages of a war, and needed a hero, and MacArthur was handy.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars What might have been, November 29, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: MacArthur and Defeat in the Philippines (Hardcover)
This book makes an excellent contribution to a chapter of history that has been overlooked. Connaughton shows that the seeds of a possible US-Japan confrontation in the Philippines were sown decades earlier. Could it have been anticipated? MacArthur's career has many examples of his military brilliance and personal bravery which are at odds with his dismal performance in the Philippines between December 1941 and April 1942. MacArthur had five years to prepare for the defense of the Philippines and his strategic plan called for Japan to land troops at Lingayen, exactly where they did. Yet lack of co-ordination among his senior military commanders and the US Navy, together with sudden changes to long developed defense plans allowed the Japanese to land virtually unopposed, making defeat inevitable.

It is intriguing to speculate how a successful defense, which should have been possible given the fact that the Japanese landed exactly where MacArthur expected them to, might have changed the course of World War II.

MacArthur is fortunate that widespread US setbacks early in the war neccesitated a national hero and allowed him the opportunity to restore his reputation. Even today there are many people who cannot accept the idea that MacArthur made any mistakes, as other reviews of this book make clear. Perhaps another writer will one day tell us why MacArthur was so convinced that the Chinese would not attack across the Yalu during the Korean war. This mistake resulted in a massive setback for the UN forces and added years to that war.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Objective study of MacArthur' true roll in the Pillippines, June 17, 2002
By 
truman bratton (Santa Cruz, CA United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: MacArthur and Defeat in the Philippines (Hardcover)
I found this work on McArthur the best objective opinion of this military "icon" written to date. It was appropriate and necessary for such a work to be written by an academic historian who was not an American in order to obtain an objective view of such a controversial man in American history. I would like to see the author write a similar analysis of McArthur's generalship in the Korean conflict. I think the author could have gained a more complete understand of the reduction of the Air Corps forces if he had reviewed the fine article by Richard Slater found in the November 1987 issue of Airpower Magazine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews




Only search this product's reviews



What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject