Customer Reviews

Machiavelli: The Prince (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought)

5 star:		(17)
4 star:		(6)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(4)
1 star:		(2)

 

 

This book was written by the famous Italian statesman Niccolo Machiavelli in 1531. This book is a classic and I was pleasantly surprised that the content was not dated and the principles translate easily into the modern worlds of business and politics.
The author wrote this book as an instruction guide for governing princes in the 1500's when Italy was divided into city states and were being defeated by many foreign powers. I belive that the work is directed to Lorenzo de Medici by a letter included in the work and because at the end of the writing Machiavelli calls for a prince to unite and lead Italy against its oppressors.
The book is not unethical as I had imagined from my understanding of the ruthlessness of Machiavellian ethics. The author is only explaining tactics to use to maintain power in a kingdom or city state that are pragmatic for his time period.
Here are some examples from the book:
1. When conquering a territory keep the current laws and institutions in place, but eliminate all the family of the defeated prince.
2. When trouble is sensed ahead of time it can be easily remedied, if you wait for it to show itself, it is to late.
3. Whoever is responsible for another becoming powerful, ruins himself.
4. There is no surer way of keeping possesion than by devastation.
5. Men do you are harm either because they hate you or they fear you.
6. Violence must be inflicted once and for all, it must be over quickly.
7. Build your power through the people.
8. Power is maintained through religious institutions.
9. Neglect the art of war and you lose your state.
10. If you act virtuously, you will be undone by those who are not, make use of this or not according to need.
The above is just a small sampling of the lessons in this book. My review can not do this book justice, it is full of wisdom and life lessons. It is a guide book for business leaders and politicians. I strongly suggest adding this book to your home library and referring to it often.

This short slender work marks a landmark in Western Civilization and made the name of the author a synonym for Satan. In 26 short, crisp essays, Niccolo Machiavelli lays out the precepts whereby a nation may be subjugated to the will of a leader, whether prince, dicator or president. Machiavelli was born in 1469 and served the republic city-state of Florence as a high-level diplomat and minister of miliatary affairs for 13 years, undertaking at least 24 crucial foreign missions. When the Medici returned to power, Machiavelli was exiled from the city and he turned his mind to authoring a massive treatise titled THE REPUBLIC. Out of that larger work, these short essays were condensed. Machiavelli had one goal in so creating THE PRINCE; he desired the unification of Italy.

However, he authored the first and one of the best works of political science ever penned.

Unlike previous works of political thought, THE PRINCE is not philosophical in nature. The author is focused on the obtaining and the maintaining of power. "Morality" is not the intent. See chapter 15:

"A man who wishes to make a profession of goodness in everything must necessarily come to grief among so many who are not good. Therefore it is necessary for a prince...to learn how not to be good, and to use this knowledge and not use it, according to the necessity of the case."

Or chapter 18: "Thus it well to seem merciful, faithful, humane, sincere, religious and also to be so; but you must have the mind so disposed that when it is needful to be otherwise you may be able to to change to the opposite qualities."

The language of this is quaint and a little stilted. It stems from the translation done by Luigi Ricci in 1903, now in the public domain. Various revisions have been done on this basic translation and there are newer and fresher translations, each with their own merits and each costing a little more. Machiavelli backs up his proverbs with allusions to classical history and to events contemporary to his own time, but while the examples he cites are dated and obscure the thoughtful reader will easily be able to see these principles working in our modern era.

For example, Machiavelli argues in Chapter 17, that while fear and love are both powerful motivations for men to support a leader, love comes from the people and the leader can not control it. It is easier to inspire fear. An American reading this argument some 470 years later can reflect on how the political opponents of George W. Bush were vilified by political smear campaigns, how the wife of a policy critic can be exposed as a CIA agent to the risk of other's lives and how a decorated war hero can be "Swiftboated".

I recommend this edition because it is cheap. The formality of the language seems appropriate and simple statements are expressed with simple grace: "The first impression that one gets of a ruler and of his brains is from seeing the men that he has about him." (Chapter 22) However, shop around and if a fresher translation takes your fancy, do not hesitate. THE PRINCE will do more to explain the conduct of those in power and enable you to judge them, better than any number of television ads. It should be required reading in any political season.

For First Edition collectors, a first edition already HAS a meaning. This will just add to the confusion of finding genuine First Editions in our web searches. This publicity stunt should be rejected. This isn't even a facsimile edition of the First Edition.

The work is highly recommended to anyone hoping to achieve an understanding of the modern mind and how medieval precepts remain in our collective political unconscious. A work on modern statesmanship, the city-state & the nation state era continues, The Prince's tactics have been co-opted in the name of evil by Communists and others but they are really just an extension of standard goodly practice of his day. Also strict leadership remains a legitimate style under the which love & respect are in a logical balance. This is contrary to the popularity contests which undermine modern Western Statesmanship.

Among his essentials for well executed statesmanship are prioritisation, decisiveness, communication & strength all of which have fallen out of favour in The West today, replaced respectively by welfare, sustainability, propaganda & consensus, which all typify non-leadership. The Machiavellian style emphasizes such common sense principles as the needs of the many outweighing the needs of the few, a remarkeable deviation from the noblesse oblige of his generaion, and the overarching importance of national unity & security.

His Prince executes his strict care or tough love based on principle and concern without which the government will sufer a loss of faith from its citizenry. Machiavelli proves himself astute in these cases. His work is quite foresightful.

My deeper impression is that this volume both beckons for the restoration of Roman era greatness which would be attempted later as well as lays the foundation for what would become the nature of centralism in governance today, sometimes mis-labelled federalism. Certainly he is correct in the challenge between fear, love & loathing in leadership. Look at his ideas as indicatve of traditions from Scripture and the family model as well as monarchy & republic. Study of his ideology can be applied at all levels for effective administration.

The Prince is an analysis of how to acquire and maintain political power.

It includes an opening dedication to Lorenzo de Medici. The dedication declares Machiavelli's intention to discuss in plain language the conduct of great men and the principles of princely government.

The book's 26 chapters discuss the different types of principalities or states, the different types of armies and the proper conduct of a prince as military leader, the character and behavior of the ruler, and the desperate political situation.

The basic ideas in this book are just as relevent to our times as ever they were centuries ago and this book is a significant addition to anyone interested in politics and political power struggles.

Probably needed for a balanced education, along with Sun Tzu.. But I don't recommend living this way.
Include some Quaker readings to give balance from the other side.

10/5 Stars:

Machiavelli, to me, was one of the most important writers of the science of war and politics. His views of war vary from both Clausewitz and Sun Tzu and he has written some interesting political views as well. The Art of War was considered to be his magnum opus, in part because it, of the two was published during his lifetime while The Prince was not. However, i consider The Prince to be far more influential and helpful in everyday life. This is a must-read for anyone interested in political science or even if you own or run a business or company. The Prince contains useful information on how to obtain a kingdom, and how to keep and maintain it; even how a prince should conduct himself to maintain either respect or fear in the hearts of the people. The book is short (about 81 pages) but very direct and precise, each sentence is worth very careful consideration.

One useful reading tip:

Unless you're a world historian, i strongly suggest reading this book next to an active internet connection for some quick history lessons. There's no lack of historic references of famous people such as Cyrus, Duke Valentino, and Alexander III of Macedon (Alexander the Great) throughout this book to emphasize Machiavelli's points and observations on the science of politics.

"The Prince" is a detailed blueprint that highlights the nuances of persuasion and power, but the text of this early sixteenth-century document can be transferred into our age. Rulers decide for themselves whether it is best to be loved or feared, and that decision can make a real difference in our lives. [...]

The Prince is an important book for anyone interested in politics and society's rule. What's especially amazing is that even though the book was written in the sixteenth-century, it is still relevant today.

In 1512, de Medici had been restored to power. Machiavelli, a Florentine public official, fell from favor, and was exiled to the countryside, where he devoted himself to studies of antiquity. In 1513, Machiavelli presented "The Prince" to de Medici, hoping to regain favor; but the effort failed. "The Prince" offers a calculating common sense approach to maintaining the rule and preservation of principalities. Machiavelli distinguishes between hereditary principalities and new ones, citing advantages and disadvantages. (From Source: [...])