|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
How to talk dirty in classical Greek!,
By Hamilton Hamilton "hamimono" (Yokohama, Japan) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy (Paperback)
I really enjoyed this book and heartily recommend it for the neophyte student in classical theater studies. Jeffrey Henderson repeats the actual Greek characters for common sexual body parts so often that even the casual reader soon begins to feel like a real classical scholar (or an ancient sailor)!
Scholars have traditionally declined to elucidate, evaluate or even discuss the nature and function of sexual and body function language in Attic Comedy (Attican, or Athenian, new comedy, that lasted throughout the reign of the Macedonian rulers, ending about 260 B.C.) This despite the fact that Aristophanes and his contemporaries wove rich, ribald tapestries of obscene words, allusions, double entendres and bawdy sight gags throughout their works. Classical researcher Jeffrey Henderson, in his The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy, attributes this to a notion that obscenity has only peripheral relevance to the actual meaning and value of the plays (they were "attention getters" to win the favor of restless audiences or, conversely, such things were not considered obscene by the Greeks). Fallacious assumptions, says Henderson. The academy's recent embrace of the undeniable accomplishments of solid gay and feminist scholarship in the areas of human sexuality and its expressions has freed researchers in the area of Classic (Old and Middle) comedy to finally acknowledge the integral connection of obscenity to the main themes of the plays, the stage actions, the development of plot and the characterization of personae. To this end, Henderson gives, in The Maculate Muse, what may be the foremost comprehensive attempt to identify and discuss all the extant obscene terminology of Attic comedy and to assess the historical, cultural and literary factors which led to obscenity's focal position in the plays of Aristophanes and others of his day. The author modestly admits that much more needs to be done. Henderson makes a case for the need for further investigation of, not merely group behavior and relative behavior to societal institutions (like marriage and public events) but also exact sexual behavior (note: this will be difficult if not impossible due to lack of objective documentation...people in every society censor/idealize their private behaviors when representing them). This reprint of Jeffrey Henderson's original 1971 dissertation, with new preface, addenda, corrigenda and retractanda, is a "starting point" and a valuable tool for a deeper appreciation of the social context of the Attic comedies. Despite the current climate of sexual conservatism in America, contemporary theater is still a glorious window into the secular and profane organic and psychosexual forces, hand in hand with intellect and society, which coshape our lives. A sensitive reevaluation of the realistic framework of the 5th century Greek comic writers reveals that the vagaries of sexuality and our attitudes toward it in the arts is an amorphous constant, alternately suppressed and celebrated, but never absent in the text and/or subtext of the theatrical tradition.
0 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Maculate Muse review,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy (Paperback)
The book's condition is not good. It's very musty. But, the book itself is what I wanted. Thanks. Barbara
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy by Jeffrey Henderson (Paperback - February 14, 1991)
$50.00 $34.51
In Stock | ||