Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
economist review, July 26, 2006
Asia's overland route
Hit the road, Jack
Jul 20th 2006
The Economist
IN THE 1960s, thousands of free-spirits set forth on the world's wildest trail, stretching 6,000 miles across six countries and three religions. The Asian odyssey began in Turkey and, barring mechanical (or mental) breakdown, took in Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan before ending up in the revered destinations of India and Nepal.
Rory MacLean retraces the steps of these "intrepids" to find out why the hippie trail became the journey of the age. The original flower children, he explains, wanted to swap the conformism of the 1950s for spiritual enlightenment. Inspired by the music of the Beatles and Bob Dylan, the works of Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg, and the social revolutions of the time, they flocked east aboard a patchouli-scented convoy of psychedelic buses, Bedford trucks and VW campervans.
Thousands took to the road, fuelled by dope and the dream of nirvana. In 1968, the year the Beatles were meditating with the Maharishi in Rishikesh, there were 10,000 young foreigners in India. Five years later, that number were crossing the border from Pakistan each week. By the mid-1970s, Afghanistan, an easygoing paradise, welcomed 90,000 visitors a year.
Mr MacLean is an entertaining guide, conjuring the flavour of the trail: the Pudding Shop in Istanbul catering for the travellers' "sugar-craving munchies"; the rose-scented, bug-infested Crown hotel in Delhi; pipes of Mustang at the Eden Hash Centre in Kathmandu; embroidered jeans, ankle bells, karma, peace and love.
Yet "Magic Bus" is more than a series of travel anecdotes; it raises questions about how the hippies influenced the places they visited. In Turkey, the author learns how their rejection of materialism spurred their host's material prosperity. In Iran, he asks if their "casual morality" stirred the "stern Islamic reawakening".
The popularity of the overland route declined when Iran's borders closed in 1979. Yet the trail gave birth to an industry which has packaged the globe. Independent travel is fashionable, students' gap years are becoming the norm, and guide books--the route was the starting point for the Lonely Planet empire--sell in huge numbers. Sadly, however, politics has, in one way or another, put the brakes on the magic bus.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Almost 300 pages to tell a whole lot of nothing, April 22, 2009
This review is from: Magic Bus: On the Hippie Trail From Istanbul to India (Paperback)
As someone who travels as lifestyle, I'm enchanted by stories of the overland journey from Turkey to Kathmandu which hundreds of thousands of young Europeans and Americans embarked upon in the 1960s and 1970s. For such an amazing scene, there are remarkably few books about it. I picked up Rory Maclean's MAGIC BUS hoping to learn more about those halcyon days of hippies and seekers. Unfortunately, the book was a disappointment.
Maclean traveled over the trail himself after Afghanistan was opened again thanks to the NATO-led overthrow of the Taliban. He claims that his goal in undertaking the journey and writing this book is to show how the hippie trail has changed from what youngsters saw 40 years ago. It doesn't really live up to this. While Macclean does dedicate some space to the trail, he doesn't really give much detail about it besides the general outline that social radicals went along it. I am sure that I am not alone in reading Macclean's book to get a better glimpse of the 1960s and 1970s scene, what it consisted of and what happened to all those myriad elements. MAGIC BUS fails here.
Much of Macclean's reporting about the current state of trail concerns only the general state of the countries involved, not about many of the specific locations connected to the hippies. And his writing about the current state is uninspired and little more than the generalities offered by the mass media. For example, he claims that Afghanistan sees no independent travel and everyone is staying away, but in the years between the overthrow of the Taliban and the publication of his book, the Russian hitchhiking club Academy of Free Travel carried out two expeditions in Afghanistan. A number of solo hitchhikers soon followed, and everyone reports Afghanistan a lovely country for the truly independent traveler. At one point towards the end of the book, we find out that it took Macclean three months to cover the trail, and yet all he could come up with was the fluff here.
There are factual errors that bothered me. During a long and worryingly out of place paen to how great Islam is, Maclean claims that Muhammad brought peace to Arabia "through non-violence". While Muhammad did unite formerly inimical Arab tribes, he was also one of the most formidable warriors in history. There's an issue of reliability, as Maclean just happens to run into a woman in the street in Turkey who turns out to have been connected to all sorts of counterculture events, from the Beatles to Woodstock, without ever showing us why we should trust this. And a lot of details seem suspiciously similar to David Tomory's A Season in Heaven, but Tomory's book is not given credit in the bibliography.
If you are looking for reading material on the Istanbul-Kathmandu trail, the best place to start is Tomory's A SEASON IN HEAVEN, a fascinating collection of oral histories. Maclean's book has a couple of interesting vignettes--such as its moving ending with one of the first Lonely Planet writers, an old man who drowns his sorrow that world travel has become commonplace and average in drink after drink. But all in all I cannot recommend it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good book, but not destined to be a classic, July 2, 2011
This review is from: Magic Bus: On the Hippie Trail From Istanbul to India (Paperback)
There were good points and bad points. On the positive side, it is an interesting read. It does cover many of the things that we have all heard about but just have not taken the time to look into further.
I will come to Mr. MacLean's defence for the criticism that it really does not delve much into the incidents and life of the trekkers of old. Upon reading the book, he seems to intentionally focus on the present. It is as though the intrepids of the 60s and 70s were merely ghosts which haunt these areas. I admit that the cover and marketing of the book is misleading in this regard, but these are shortcomings of the marketing department and not the author.
However there were many things that I did not care for in the book. Typical commercial style is to start each chapter with a "hook". The purpose of which is to grab people's attention when they are browsing a bookstore. This is derived from the universal tendency of shoppers to start reading from the beginning of a chapter, usually the first chapter. However for some reason, Mr. MacLean chose to start each chapter with a few paragraphs of purple prose. This prose was so awkward and impenetrable that I frequently had to read it two to three times just to figure out what he was trying to say. I am sorry to say that this does not sound like an effective "hook" to me.
The biggest deficiency is in the large number of errors that I encountered. I noticed them mainly in the Indian section. This was because I lived for many years in India during the 1970s. I did not notice them in other sections, because I have never lived there. But if the same rate of errors is extrapolated to the rest of the book, then the accuracy of this work is highly questionable. The curious thing is that these were very simple errors which could have been caught simply by spending some time on the internet.
There was another area that I found a bit disconcerting. A number of characters seemed to be "composites". Now there is nothing wrong with composites per se. In narrative journalism this is a required way to keep the number of characters down to a manageable and readable level. But proper journalistic ethics requires that the reader be informed of this in the preface.
The slipshod way in which factual errors were made, combined with the unwillingness to discuss composite characters sends a very strong signal. The accuracy of this book is very questionable and every "fact" must be considered suspect.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
