Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.

Buy Used
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: Unbeatable customer service, and we usually ship the same or next day. Over one million satisfied customers!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Making A Killing Hardcover – February 1, 1999

2.2 out of 5 stars 44 customer reviews

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
New from Used from
"Please retry"
$1.94 $0.01

The Black Presidency by Michael Eric Dyson
"The Black Presidency"
Rated by Vanity Fair as one of our most lucid intellectuals writing on race and politics today, this book is a provocative and lively look into the meaning of America's first black presidency. Learn more

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

Author Tom Diaz makes no bones about his animus toward guns: he wants to regulate the U.S. firearms industry to death--literally. Guns are responsible for about 36,000 deaths each year in the United States (more than half are suicides), and so Diaz views them as a public health hazard requiring a massive government intervention. Making a Killing is hardly a dispassionate treatment; Diaz himself is a political activist (and a former Congressional aide). He suggests adopting strategies used against cigarette makers and admires the success antismoking zealots have experienced in their crusade. Much of his treatment focuses on the business of gun making, especially its lightness of regulation and what he considers to be its obsessive secrecy ("The firearms industry is a business so secret that it makes the tobacco industry look like a model of transparency"). He is also appalled that manufacturers make profits from these products and mortified that several leading firearms producers are foreign-owned (is he equally alarmed about who makes most of America's VCRs?). Making a Killing probably won't bring any new soldiers into the antigun camp, but for those already there it is a ready source of information and outrage. --John J. Miller

From The New England Journal of Medicine

A compelling cry for government regulation. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 272 pages
  • Publisher: New Press, The (February 1, 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 156584470X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1565844704
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 6.5 x 9.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 15.2 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 2.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (44 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #797,320 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

I was born into a military family and raised largely in the American South, where I learned to shoot in the Boy Scouts and was on a rifle team in high school. I served in the Air National Guard as a small arms specialist and in the Army National Guard as an anti-tank platoon leader. Worked for the Department of Defense (Advanced Research Projects Agency) in Thailand for a while during the Vietnam War. I also served three years as a District of Columbia Police Department reserve officer.

I graduated from the University of Florida (BA Pol. Sci. 1962)(Go Gators!) and Georgetown University Law Center (1972, editor, Law Journal). I've followed a wandering career course, practiced law in and out of government, became a journalist and ended up serving six years as assistant managing editor at the very conservative The Washington Times newspaper in Washington. My guru was the former editor-in-chief Arnaud de Borchgrave, a true professional whose passion was and is journalism and truth, not ideology. I also reported from Central America, Russia, India, Pakistan and the first Gulf War before leaving The Times. I then spent two years at a small think tank in Washington studying terrorism and international organized crime, and from there went to work in 1993 (following the first WTC bombing attack) as a Democratic counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives Crime Subcommittee, where I worked on legislation and hearings involving terrorism and firearms.

I currently work part-time at the nonprofit Violence Policy Center in Washington. I sought out this work and center after I was converted from an NRA partisan to a gun control advocate based on what I learned about the predatory American gun industry while serving on "the Hill." The rest of my time I devote to projects involving the study of crime, terrorism, and history.

I used to be a "Scoop Jackson Democrat" politically, but today I am decidely non-partisan---I find little competence, honesty, or source of inspiration in either "organized party."

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
Ignore the clearly biased reviews of the pro gun crowd. Tom Diaz cogently defends his position with facts and figures.

If you want to understand why an organization of mostly reasonable hunters and other responsible gun owners (The NRA) fights basic, common sense regulations supported by 80% of the people, follow the money.
Comment 14 of 19 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By A Customer on March 6, 1999
Format: Hardcover
From the comments of other readers here, you might think this book is some kind of predictable rant. In fact, it's solid reporting, soberly presented. It's filled with direct quotes from gun industry executives and gun magazines that prove the writer's points. Sure, the author has a point of view, but he doesn't shove it down your throat. I found it very analytical and persuasive. I hope other people will be more open-minded about the amazing research in this book. It made me see the gun control issue in a new light.
Comment 19 of 28 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Tom Diaz's book is a brutal eye-opener. As a former target shooter, and former NRA member, I never really bought the extreme pro-gun position that firearms should be essentially unregulated. But what I didn't know about the gun industry and its backers and how they operate would have filled several large books. Diaz's book shocked me into harsh reality. It is crammed with data, statistics, and analysis that should appall and horrify any reasonable reader. The gun industry and its apologists (not just the National Rifle Association, but multiple other organizations as well), peddling fear and loathing while flooding the nation with deadly guns that are suitable for neither hunting nor target shooting, disclaims all responsibility for the resulting carnage. How many thousands of lives have been ruined as a result? Diaz cites hundreds of examples -- many as direct quotes from the gun industry's own spokesmen -- as proof that the gun companies' primary motive is to maximize profits, and never mind the deadly toll they take.
Comment 0 of 1 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By A Customer on September 24, 2000
Format: Hardcover
Tom Diaz's book is a chilling and convincing indictment of the gun industry and the pro-gun press that acts as their mouthpiece. I read it in a single afternoon. "Making a Killing" is a fundamental book for those who think that there are alternatives to concealed weapon (CCW) liberalization and that some industries will do anything to increase their profit margin, even at the expense of public safety. First of all, I thought that Diaz's section explaining the difference in caliber and types of weaponry was very helpful (32-35). Many gun advocates like confusing these definitions, in the public sphere and in legislative committees, to try and discredit those who oppose them. (Note the earlier reader who attempts this tired strategy.) Diaz's explanation of how the semantics of "assault rifle" changed from the early 1980s to the early 1990s was illuminating (126-128).
I was unaware of the ways that gun manufacturers exploit ties to law enforcement agencies. After much lobbying to insure the criminals have access to high-power, compact weapons, they then go to the police to get them to trade in their six-shooters for pistols. Gun manufacturers then buy the old guns and re-sell them, where they often wind-up in the wrong hands (146-148). The conclusion is clear: the gun industry intends to make its money by selling to both sides of the domestic arms race that they have largely created. For anyone who ever wondered why the NRA and other groups have advocated the most illogical and ineffective gun laws imaginable, it is because they have an interest ($$) in making sure criminals are armed.
Diaz's analysis of the recent push to liberalize CCW (concealed carry weapon) legislation nationwide confirmed my suspicions.
Read more ›
Comment 28 of 48 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
By A Customer on November 7, 1999
Format: Hardcover
As a gun owner who has been eagerly looking for someone or some group that advocates a realistic and sensible plan to deal with gun violence, I was incredibly let down by this book. The first thing that needs to be dealt with is the fact that the gun industry is not this incrediby profitable industry. Most American gun companies have been limping along, some of the more notables being pulled from bankruptcy. But beyond this the book is just tired, feeble, and bases its appeal on inflammatory statements. It's really not a surprise, considering Diaz works for the most dishonest interest group outside of big tobacco: The Violence Policy Center. The VPC is nothing more than an organization that seeks to ban guns via radical spin, deception, and outright dishonesty. (An example is the VPC's web sites criticism of scholar John Lott... the criticism focuses purely on other views of Lott's, taken completely out of context, and in no way even attempts to argue his methodology.) Diaz follows all the trends of his employer in this book. Furthermore, Diaz's claim that he is a "reformed gun nut" seem completely implausible; he just makes too many mistakes. There are many excellent scholars on the subjects of guns in this country. David Kopel, John Lott, Gary Kleck, and Don B. Kates all have more serious, mature, scientific and responsible presentations than this dishonest screed. If anything, this book is a superb example of why the gun debate in this country is so acrimonious and non-productive. Guns are deadly, yes. But so is stupidity and the establishment of laws that have been shown to be failures. This book is lethal in its stupidity and arrogance and its appeal to emotionalism over sound science.
Comment 36 of 62 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews