15 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
brilliant, June 7, 2007
This review is from: Making War to Keep Peace (Hardcover)
Biographical information about Jeane Kirkpatrick is contained in the Editorial Review. She died of heart failure at age 80, just months before this book went to print. Ms. Kirkpatrick had a true and clear mind right to the end.
In this work I expected a "realpolitik" analysis of the power struggles, strategic alliances, competition for resources of the modern global era and how these related to the use of force in certain circumstances. These matters are kept in the background as Ms. Kirkpatrick uses her keen intellect to analyze, and in some instances "expose" that most important of modern international institutions, the United Nations.
She describes the relevance of the U.N. Charter and resolutions as they come into conflict (and occasional concert) with United States' foreign policy doctrines, NATO, and the European Union since the collapse of the Russian empire. Six modern clashes that led to violence are analyzed: The Persian Gulf War, Somalia, Haiti, The Balkan Wars, Kosovo, and in one chapter, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Kirkpatrick's exposition is too complex to condense in this review, but she presents the clearest explanation of the forces at work in the Balkan Wars I've read. The inability of the U.N. to prevent the genocidal Milosevic from slaughtering thousands of innocents in the greatest European horror since the Holocaust is scrutinized and exposed. She also makes a solid case that, during their tenures, United Nations Secretary Generals Boutros-Ghali and Kofi Annan did their utmost to centralize and increase the power of their offices beyond the scope of the original Charter's intention.
Perhaps because her time was running out, Jeane Kirkpatrick was not able to fully engage herself in the current discussion about the Middle East. The book jacket and other advertisements state that Kirkpatrick had "grave reservations" about the war in Iraq. This is sensationalistic exaggeration. She only used this expression one time. In fact she goes to great length to build a legal brief based on the U.N. Charter, resolutions, and the U.S. Constitution to prove that President Bush's decision to go to war with Iraq was absolutely legitimate. She concludes: "Thus, whatever other debates may persists about the war, the contention that it was "illegal" is itself illegitimate."
This book is a brilliant elaboration of the machinations of the modern United Nations, as well as a compendium of modern international conflict.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A useful review, May 16, 2007
This review is from: Making War to Keep Peace (Hardcover)
The late Jeane Kirkpatrick has achieved iconic status within the Republican party, both for her service as Ambassador to the United Nations and as an international pundit. Yet Ambassador Kirkpatrick did not inhabit the margins of the conservative political spectrum being neither a neo-con nor Pat Buchanan style isolationist. The former ambassador was a "realist" who required US foreign policy to be a servant of "vital national interests." This basic belief is utilized in its full power in "Making War to Keep Peace."
The book is meticulously researched. With slightly over 300 pages of primary content, an additional 40 pages of notes are presented. Ambassador Kirkpatrick provided overwhelming detail of the events covered. The time frame begins with President George H. W. Bush (Bush 41) through the presidency of George W. Bush (Bush 43), and covers a number of international (mis)adventures.
If there are any complaints, it would be that Ambassador Kirkpatrick did not provide her opinions on a number of events. For example, she documents fully why Bush 41 held the American forces at the borders of Iraq following the expulsion of the Iraqi armies from Kuwiat. She also notes the desire of General Norman Schwartzkoff to "finish the job" by destroying the Iraqi military and overtaking Baghdad. Yet Ambassador Kirkpatrick withholds her opinion as to which course she would have recommended.
In addition, I believed that occasions when the United States could have acted but didn't, such as the shameful refusal of the Clinton administration to intervene in Rwanda or the Bush 43 ignoring of Darfur, could have been discussed as counterpoint to the occasions, such as Sommalia, when the US did act. It would be interesting to learn of her view why some problems were considered of national interest and others, were not.
All in all, this was a very interesting and usefull review of parts of the United States' foreign policy since 1990. "Making War to Keep Peace" will surely not ever be considered a seminal work, but certainly is a surprisingly balanced and authoritative presentation.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Making War to Keep Peace, July 2, 2007
This review is from: Making War to Keep Peace (Hardcover)
A wonderful read from the practical, principled perspective of a true patriot. This book should be required reading for all who seek the office of chief executive of the United States. Jeane Kirpatrick understood full well the stakes of committing a nation to war when necessary to preserve the compelling goal of global peace.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No