Qty:1
  • List Price: $31.50
  • Save: $2.23 (7%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Little to no use but is showing some wear, scuffing and minor tearing around the edge of the cover. Pages are in overall good shape. Has a product bar code sticker on the back cover. Ships from Amazon. Great Customer Service! Fast shipping! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street Paperback – November 29, 2001

ISBN-13: 978-0674006881 ISBN-10: 0674006887

Buy New
Price: $29.27
18 New from $22.18 26 Used from $4.73
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$29.27
$22.18 $4.73
Best%20Books%20of%202014

Frequently Bought Together

Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street + Managed by the Markets: How Finance Re-Shaped America
Price for both: $59.79

Buy the selected items together
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 240 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press (November 29, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0674006887
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674006881
  • Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 0.6 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #666,619 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

[This is] a great must-read. Abolafia's central thesis is that markets cannot be viewed simply as anonymous fora where nameless economic forces work their mysterious ways to determine equilibrium price-quantity outcomes. Instead, they are better seen as stages on which diverse groups of actors seek to further their own, often conflicting, interests...The view that markets are social constructs has a particularly significant consequence for understanding and reacting to the phenomenon of manipulation. Abolafia's view that manipulation 'arises out of a conflict between buyers and sellers where one side is pressing its advantage', rather than being either a legal definition or an economic phenomenon, is extremely convincing...It is impossibly infuriating that one's assumptions about how the financial world works should be overturned by a mere sociologist. (Ruben Lee London Financial News)

Mitchel Abolafia's fascinating...book...is a great take on the other side of world finance, on life's most bruising sport--making money--and on how to think about markets as interdependent social structures. (Peter Evans Contemporary Sociology)

About the Author

Mitchel Y. Abolafia is Professor, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, University at Albany, State University of New York.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
1
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Michael Wald on February 24, 2006
Format: Paperback
Mitchel Abolafia considers the role that competition and cooperation plays among players, not only at the New York Stock Exchange, but also among other market makers such as in the commodity markets. He finds that, despite the obvious competitive nature of these markets, players in these markets also find cooperation necessary in order to create orderly markets. It is good overview, but I was hoping for a more in-depth discussion of the role that opportunism plays. It needed to draw more upon the theoretical knowledge on economic opportunism. At the same time, while it does contain a number of personal stories, I felt that the book could have given more of a day-to-day sense of how players in these markets interact and view each other. So in one sense it lacks the academic underpinnings that would have made it more appealing to academics, and on the other hand, it lacks the detailed descriptions of the small interactions among players that would appeal to the more general reader.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on June 8, 2004
Format: Paperback
This book discusses the types of control (aka restraint) the author found in three settings of traders ('market makers'): the futures market, the bond market, and the stock exchange. The studies were conducted at different times, and under different conditions in each market, which makes comparing across the settings somewhat difficult. However, Abolafia does a good job of addressing those issues, and does a commendable job of drawing together three otherwise very different studies into a single rubric. His conclusion--that the social context of each market plays a big role in the opportunities and constraints actors in each market face--will come as no surprise to followers of the new economic sociology (since Granovetter's 1985 embeddedness article). But even other readers will find Abolafia's evidence quite convincing on this point. He uses his ethnographic data, collected over a decade, to demonstrate how market actors are embedded in social context.
When I used this in an undergraduate Sociology of Work class, most students did not catch the distinctions Abolafia made between the various settings. I tried using this with Simpson's work on types of social control in the workplace (direct, hierarchical, bureaucratic, occupational, etc), and while students saw some connections, they did not get the fine distinctions Abolafia made which I had hoped they would, since his comparison across market settings forms a core element of his argument.
Would work well in graduate level courses, or courses specifically on economic sociology. For scholars of the market (economists or sociologists) this is a book not to be missed!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again