Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
|New from||Used from|
Starred Review. Justice Breyer (Active Liberty) looks at how the Supreme Court evolved historically and defined its role largely in relation to the willingness of the public to embrace its decisions. Readers may be surprised to learn that in many democracies, parliaments are not bound to accept decisions by their court; similarly, the U.S. Constitution doesn't give the Supreme Court final say. Breyer tells the story of President Jackson's grudging acceptance of a Court decision protecting the treaty rights of the Cherokee nation, only to seize their land using Federal troops. In the Dred Scott decision, the pro-slavery Court violated the right of Free states to outlaw slavery. And in Brown vs. the Kansas Board of Education, President Eisenhower used the Army to back up Court decisions against segregated education. Breyer discusses recent Court decisions in favor of rights for Guantanamo detainees and examines the limitations of a President's power as Commander-in-Chief, even in wartime, contrasting this to the failure of the Court, Congress, and President Roosevelt over internment camps during WWII. An accomplished writer, Justice Breyer's absorbing stories offer insight into how a democracy works, and sometimes fails. (Sept.)
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
Justice Breyer was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1994 (and, of course, he serves for life, as mandated by the Constitution). His book partners well with Jeffrey Toobin’s well-received The Nine (2007), which is an account of the politics and personalities of the current Supreme Court. Breyer projects a larger context, supplying both historical and judicial background to give the nonspecialist a generalized picture of how the Supreme Court works. He explains the Court’s role in ensuring a workable democracy, in guaranteeing that the Constitution works in practice and in the real world. Certainly an interesting aspect of this greatly informative book is Breyer’s look back over the history of the republic to see how the public—and even the U.S. president—has accepted Court decisions. (It is not readily imaginable, to be sure, but, nevertheless, it is dramatically illustrated here that such acceptance was a principle that was not easy to plant within social and political consciousnesses.) Breyer is emphatic that “at the end of the day, the public’s confidence is what permits the Court to ensure a Constitution that is more than words on paper.” A book for all citizens. --Brad Hooper --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.See all Editorial Reviews
Supreme Court Justice Breyer takes an honorable stab at explaining to laypeople such as myself the importance and complexities of determining the Constitutionality of certain... Read morePublished 12 months ago by Franklin the Mouse
This excellent book explains the fundamental working of the Supreme Court for the educated layman. It is still a bit of a difficult read, but worth the effort.Published 16 months ago by Lost Ibis
This book will provide insight into many of the legal underpinnings of decisions reached by the U.S. Supreme Court, as viewed by one of its members. Read morePublished 19 months ago by RICHARD JOHNSON
A very informative, well written, book describing some major cases and analyzing the decision process of a supreme court justicePublished 21 months ago by Michael
Despite all the self criticism, this book reminds me of the many unique reasons to be proud of all the wonders that Americans have achieved agaisnt all odds. Read morePublished on September 26, 2013 by whj
The book arrived on time and as promised. It was not a bad investment, still have not had the time to read it all.Published on August 25, 2013 by HOU64
"Only one-third of all Americans can name the three branches of government (two-thirds can name a television judge on American Idol); only one-third of eighth graders can describe... Read morePublished on June 23, 2013 by Norman A. Pattis