The Making of the President 1964 [Hardcover]

Theodore H. White (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: January 2001

Theodore H. White’s landmark Making of the President series revolutionized American political journalism, investing his subject with both epic scope and a fresh frankness about backroom political strategy that was unlike anything that had come before. In this second volume of his groundbreaking series, White offers an intimate chronicle of the 1964 campaign for the White House, from the earthshaking tragedy of President Kennedy’s assassination through the battle for power between Lyndon B. Johnson and Barry Goldwater, whose candidacy paved the way for the modern conservative movement. White reports from within both campaigns, bringing to life a turbulent year in America’s history and a furious contest between two tough and seasoned political pros.

--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Theodore H. White (1915–1986) was an American political journalist, historian, and novelist, best known for the Making of the President series: his accounts of the 1960, 1964, 1968, and 1972 presidential elections, all of which are being reissued with new forewords by Harper Perennial Political Classics. His other books include Thunder Out of China, America in Search of Itself, and In Search of History: A Personal Adventure.

--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 480 pages
• Publisher: ACLS History E-Book Project (January 2001)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1597401536
• ISBN-13: 978-1597401531
• Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.1 x 1.4 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,412,415 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Ode to JFK, July 27, 2008

By 

Randy Keehn (Williston, ND United States) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Making of the President 1964 (Hardcover)

In completing "The Making of the President 1964" I have read all of Theodore White's series. I realized after beginning this book that Mr. White was apparently in awe of one of the subjects of his first book in this series; John F. Kennedy. Admittedly, the assasination of President Kennedy was a major event in our history and it certainly had an effect on the election of 1964. However, White portrays JFK as a man far greater than anyone else in the political world of 1963-64. In doing so, he diminishes his credibility. As a youth in those times, I remember the tragedy of Kennedy's assasination. I ALSO remember the awesomeness of President's Johnson's agenda. I won't debate the pros and cons of the "Great Society". I will, however, acknowledge that LBJ got things done that I don't believe JFK could have. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a prime example. It should have been the Civil Rights Act of 1963 but I don't believe that President Kennedy had the influence or power to have accomplished what President Johnson did. Unfortunately, although White makes allowances for the skills of Lyndon Johnson, the recurring theme in this book is that JFK would have been so much better.

Oh, by the way, there was another man who was involved in this race; Senator Barry Goldwater. White's treatment of Goldwater goes somewhat along the line that the Senator was good company in an after hours social gathering but that he was inept politically. White is especially harsh on Goldwater's vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I recall, from reading his autobiography some years ago, that Goldwater opposed the legislation on Constitutional grounds. Whether or not one agrees with his opinion that the Act violated the seperation of powers cited in the US Constitution, Theodore White owed Goldwater at least a brief explanation of the Senator's rationale. I did not come across one sentence to that effect leaving the Republican candidate appearing like he had a few sheets in the closet.

Obviously, I found a great deal to criticize about White's perspective of the men involved in this election. I will acknowledge that the author covered a lot of ground and background in putting this book together. His analyses of the issues of the day are somewhat dated but also gives evidence that he still has a pretty good insight on national politics and issues. 1964 was a tough year to be a Republican. Based on White's adoration of JFK, it was also a tough year to be a Democrat who was anybody but John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars End Of The Innocence, May 27, 2005

By 

Bill Slocum (Norwalk, CT USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Making of the President 1964 (Paperback)

For East Coast Americans like myself, 1964 was the Year of the Beatles, New York's World's Fair, and Bob Gibson. It was also a presidential election year, but not so interesting as such, with incumbent Lyndon Baines Johnson running as heir to his martyred predecessor Kennedy against a Sun Belt Republican most saw as a right-wing kook.

"It was over before it began," Theodore H. White acknowledges near the end of his history of the campaign, "The Making Of The President 1964." "The issue had been decided long before - perhaps within minutes of the fatal shot at Dallas."

That shooting in Dallas, almost a year before the election proper, is the setting for the opening of the book, and it offers a vivid account of just what was going on in those chaotic initial minutes and hours after John F. Kennedy's murder. White describes the funeral procession, the carting up of Kennedy's possessions in the Oval Office, and the rent feelings of the nation with sharply-focused prose that reads like poetry.

White seems less engaged in the rest of his narrative. His heart obviously broken by the death of Kennedy, a personal friend, he is at a loss to describe the principal combatants of this campaign. Johnson was an outsider to the Kennedy circle still smarting over the East Coast Establishment types who rejected him. LBJ wouldn't give White so much as a single interview for his book, as White makes clear in a cagey footnote. Barry Goldwater, the Republican challenger, is more welcoming but no less aloof, and inscrutable to White, a moderate liberal who can't fathom how such an extremist got the reins of a major party.

"In Goldwater, one had to take all or nothing," White notes, and though that's true with any presidential candidate, that's more of a problem with Goldwater, who spoke enthusiastically of using nuclear weapons in conventional combat and voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

White seems to have trouble getting a handle on many players in this book, including the civil rights leaders whom White either describes as faultless angels (Martin Luther King) or vicious racists (Adam Clayton Powell) without much gray allowed. Too often he sinks into platitudes, crediting Johnson for his "deft response" to North Vietnamese attacks at the Gulf of Tonkin, when in fact his response was confused and plunged us deeper into war; or explaining to us the higher moral purpose that led Nelson Rockefeller, Republican governor of New York, to take a married mother of four as his mistress.

Better writing on that score comes from White's account of Rockefeller's angry speech to Goldwater supporters at the Republican convention in San Francisco, where he incites the crowd into an extremist fury. One angry woman screams back: "You lousy lover!"

Every once and again, White gets it right, as with the many moods of Lyndon Johnson, "the most extreme swings between tenderness and cruelty, between dedication and cynicism, between comedy and high purpose." White even mentions Johnson's otherwise secret tape recordings, which when examined back up much of the LBJ reporting here.

About Goldwater, White is less certain of his ground, but whether from charity or clarity of vision, his likening of Goldwater to William Jennings Bryan in the pantheon of failed presidential candidates has turned out quite apt.

White was still trying to keep on his Camelot-colored spectacles in this second campaign history, but the painful adjustments he struggles with here, once made, would render far better his third and fourth installments of this series to come "Making '68" and "Making '72."

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars The Ghost of JFK, November 28, 2011

By 

Franklin the Mouse (Gorham, ME USA) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The Making of the President 1964 (Paperback)

Mr. White's chronology of the 1964 Presidential race was published in 1965. Our nation was still in shock over the murder of President Kennedy, the Cold War was in full swing, the Civil Rights Movement with multiple race riots was front and center and television news was coming into its own as a powerful, sensationalistic, social medium. The author starts off the book with a riveting account of JFK's assassination which sets the tone for the remainder of the book. It is well-known that Mr. White was enamoured of the Kennedys and it clearly shows in how he portrays them. But beyond his bias and liberal inclinations, the Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist does an outstanding job describing the 1964 run for the White House. Little did Mr. White know that Senator Barry Goldwater's shellacking by President Johnson was the first stirrings of the future Reagan Revolution and that LBJ's presidency would collapse under the storm brewing in Vietnam. The reader will come to understand the power struggle between the Eastern, liberal GOP establishment vs the evergrowing Southern and Western mindset. He does a commendable job of describing both Southern politicians and how their philosophical attitudes about the role of government were very different. The book captures the feel of the times, the behind-the-scenes brawls and shows a vibrant economic country struggling with who we are as a nation? This is a civic lesson with flair. I enjoyed it even more than Mr. White's first volume describing the 1960 race between Kennedy and Nixon. A truly great work of reporting and, yes, art.