In The Making of the President 1972, the fourth volume of narrative history of American politics in action, Theodore H. White brings his defining quartet of campaign narratives to a surprising and riveting close. The consummate journalist, White chronicles both the Democratic and the Republican parties as they jockeyed for position toward the end of Richard M. Nixon’s turbulent first term. He illuminates the cinematic moments that shaped the campaign—the attempt on George Wallace’s life, Edmund Muskie crying in the snow in New Hampshire, the swift rise and fall of Tom Eagleton, and the ongoing anguish of Vietnam—leading inexorably to a second chaotic collapse among the Democrats and a landslide victory for Nixon. Yet even as the president’s highest ambitions were confirmed, White watches aghast as the “new Nixon” of 1968 is eclipsed by the corrupt Nixon of old—a Shakespearean conclusion to an astonishing political epoch.
The Making of the President 1972 (Landmark Political)
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle.
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book Description
--This text refers to the
Paperback
edition.
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Theodore H. White (1915–1986) was an American political journalist, historian, and novelist, best known for the Making of the President series: his accounts of the 1960, 1964, 1968, and 1972 presidential elections, all of which are being reissued with new forewords by Harper Perennial Political Classics. His other books include Thunder Out of China, America in Search of Itself, and In Search of History: A Personal Adventure.
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Still Has It,
By
This review is from: The Making of the President, 1972: A Narrative History of American Politics in Action (Hardcover)
The Making of the President 1972 is Theodore White's penultimate entry in the series dating back to 1960 and the last of the consecutive elections he covered in detail. He has never been able to live up to his own high 1960 standard, but the subsequent "Making of" books are still worthwhile reads and 1972 is no exception. As with his past entries, White not only chronicles the presidential campaign, but offers rich commentary on the nation's politics, events, and people. Somehow, White manages to key in extremely closely on an event but still give excellent context that demonstrates how the event fits into broader societal shifts.
A few things I noticed in this outing: 1. White really likes Richard Nixon. In previous entries, I do not remember his admiration and respect for Nixon, despite White's self-admitted liberal leanings, coming across so much. Ironically, the book was written during the height of investigations into Nixon's activities with his impeachment and removal looming. 2. White offers some of the greatest details on the stresses of the modern presidency. These details come late in the book, but when White describes the number of appointments the President makes, how many reports he (and some day she) is supposed to read, and the issues they are supposed to influence it is truly mind boggling how any human being can even attempt it. To a lesser extent, White demonstrates a similar problem with presidential candidates. The vice presidential selection process that McGovern used was rushed at best, stupid at worst. A contributing factor was the schedule he was keeping. 3. It is amazing how many people said no to the offer of the Democratic VP nomination, both before and after the Eagleton chaos. It is almost comical to read. As with his previous entries, White offers plenty of detail from both campaigns, although after the Democratic convention there is little to say about the McGovern effort due to its total failure. The election was over by September, even if McGovern had not yet realized it.
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Anatomy Of A Blowout,
By
This review is from: The Making of the President, 1972: A Narrative History of American Politics in Action (Hardcover)
As the last of four successive accounts of presidential campaigns linked by their titles and author, "The Making Of The President 1972" is a remarkable end note to a series that places writer Theodore H. White at the vanguard of his subject, the Bruce Catton of campaign historians. But was the 1972 race worthy of his eloquence?
People generally agree that Richard Nixon's election in 1968, however understandable in the context of the times, was a misstep in American history. As president, he angered liberals, alienated moderates, embarrassed conservatives, widened the generation gap, and deepened the malaise it took 10 more years for the U.S. to recover from. If 1968's Democratic candidate, Hubert Humphrey, had won and appointed a tough Henry Kissinger-like statesman to run foreign policy, the nation would have been better off. It's far less popular to embrace the concept of Nixon's losing to his 1972 rival, Sen. George McGovern. In part that's because Nixon in 1972 was doing well with Vietnam, China, and the Soviet Union, and it was a dangerous time to change horses. Also, McGovern was too much of a left-wing stooge. White makes a convincing, often entertaining case for McGovern's ineptitude in his book, like the ridiculous battles McGovernites undertook at their convention to chip away their party's own elected delegates and replace them with a higher proportion of women and minorities. Even with the specter of Watergate arising in the last days before the election, Nixon was seen as the wiser choice to liberals like White and some of Humphrey's top supporters. Not only did McGovern alienate centrists with his dogma, he was fatally unable to stick by people who stuck by him, like the running mate McGovern declared himself "1000 percent" behind just before dumping him. White even pokes holes at McGovern's "St. George" image with anecdotes of the Senator's double dealings. To no one's surprise, Nixon blew McGovern away that November, by 61 percent to 38 percent in the popular vote, and sweeping the electoral vote except for Massachusetts and the District of Columbia. Even McGovern's home state of South Dakota went with Nixon by eight percentage points. White thought it could have been a bigger blowout: "Had it not been for Watergate, it is quite possible that Richard Nixon's margin would have been increased by another three to four million votes," adding that the state vote totals for senate races were often higher than the votes for president, suggesting some disillusionment with both candidates. Why is "Making Of The President 1972" still worth your time more than 30 years on? In part it's because the McGovern candidacy was an important one, with resonance in today's political scene. The Democrats are still divided between their moderates and true believers, and this was their equivalent of what the 1964 race was for the GOP, when Barry Goldwater sounded the trumpet for his party's ideologues in a way that would echo through history. But mainly it's because White was the great one when it came to political writing. Without hyperbole or vitriol, he manages to create a galloping narrative that always takes the high road, a feat difficult then and almost unimaginable today. He also gives some of the most concise word portraits of characters like McGovern and Nixon (who sharply corrects White at one point when the writer complements him on his office's yellow decor: "We call it gold.") The matter of Watergate, too, is presented effectively if incompletely (the scandal was still a year from resolution when White's book went to press.) "A good clipping service would have provided the Committee to Re-Elect with more information than any number of wire-taps," White marvels. It's amazing not so much how Nixon broke the law (he wasn't the first or last president that way) but for the sheer lack of necessity involved. At one point, White espies a slogan on a wall: "Winning's Not Everything, It's The Only Thing." Alas, as Nixon would learn, this isn't always so.
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
White underestimates Watergate,
By
This review is from: The Making of the President, 1972: A Narrative History of American Politics in Action (Hardcover)
Those who complain that Theodore White was too deferential to JFK in his groundbreaking classic "The Making of the President 1960" should read this book. Here, White is not nearly as hard on Richard Nixon for Watergate as subsequent events have proven he should have been. Nevertheless, this is still an informative account of the 1972 election, which was much more exciting than the final result would indicate. The inepitude of George McGovern's campaign alone provides plecty of entertainment. An excellent book for political junkies.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Inside This Book
(learn more)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
